To me wht matters is that Rhode and others spent time and money creating a ride as an experience. If they felt that a waterfall on the backside was needed, then there was purpose. They do not pay thses people to create blue sky ideas, make them, and then cut corners after they were built. I myself agree with others, how do you let something go, when it's this new. I have 2 bathrooms in my house, just cause I don't use one and no one see's it, does that mean if it doesn't work that it should not be a priority. This is the icon of the park. Get it right for Walt...Get it right for the stock holders, there is a budget, but if I want broken, non themed rides I can go to Six Flags.
OFF MY BOX....:fork:
That being said, DAK is open 365 days each year (unless we get hurricanes) and EE is really no more than a very complex rail system with hundreds (or thousands) of different individual pieces of equipment, most made by different manufactuers, and most with moving parts. Anything with moving parts (no matter how well maintained) is subject to break, or at least wear out upon occasion.
DAK is a park that has an annual attendence of about 8.5million people, which (I know attendence peaks and valleys throughout the year) averages about 23,250 people per day.....EVERYDAY.
Now, EE is a very complex rail system that can handle 1,600 - 1,800 guests per hour, and if the park is open 10 hours, that would be 16,000-18,000 people that ride EE every day of the year.
Now, I don't work for Disney, I don't have access to any of their guest research, but I can assume with a great deal of confidence that the average guests has the following priorities:
1. The ride is safe
2. The ride is open
3. The ride is "fun"
So, being that it is probably impossible (or financially irresponsible) to ensure every single aspect of the attraction is fully operational on a 365-day per year basis, I tend to believe that more people would gladly have a lack of steam (which 90% of the people, if not more, do not even notice) than a lack of attraction (even if not 100% cosmetically operational)