Yes.The gift shop is easily the bigger loss
Yes.The gift shop is easily the bigger loss
Don't get me started on the theme of that ride. His Dad went through hell to find him in the original movie. So he decides to purposely go missing again? What a brat.I’d say Nemo is, although it was technically a downgrade of the preexisting seacab attraction
Don't get me started on the theme of that ride. His Dad went through hell to find him in the original movie. So he decides to purposely go missing again? What abratclown... fish.
The Indy refurb will be similar. Throughout the ride, Indy will be looking for Short Round frantically calling out for him while the little tyke his hiding behind bushes giggling.Don't get me started on the theme of that ride. His Dad went through hell to find him in the original movie. So he decides to purposely go missing again? What a brat.
Isn't the attraction based on the first movie?Don't get me started on the theme of that ride. His Dad went through hell to find him in the original movie. So he decides to purposely go missing again? What a brat.
It’s not because Nemo is never taken by the dentist. He interacts with characters that he never met in the first movie (Crush & Bruce). He’s just playing a cruel one-sided game of hide & seek.Isn't the attraction based on the first movie?
Maybe I need to watch the first movie again. I could have sworn it followed the first movie, minus the dentist.It’s not because Nemo is never taken by the dentist. He interacts with characters that he never met in the first movie (Crush & Bruce). He’s just playing a cruel one-sided game of hide & seek.
It follows a lot of the same story beats, but it’s definitely not a 1:1 retelling. It feels more like a loose sequel. Marlin even says something along the lines of “not again.”Maybe I need to watch the first movie again. I could have sworn it followed the first movie, minus the dentist.
The Nemo queue is more interesting than the omnimover ride.I’d say Nemo is, although it was technically a downgrade of the preexisting seacab attraction
No no we'll clearly learn that these mythical monsters can plaaaaayyyyyThe Indy refurb will be similar. Throughout the ride, Indy will be looking for Short Round frantically calling out for him while the little tyke his hiding behind bushes giggling.
I think it's more to so with the repeated use of trackless rides since 2019: Rise of the Resistance, Mickey and Minnie’s Runaway Railway x2, Beauty and the Beast at TDL, Ratatouille, and Zootopia at Shanghai.Other than issues with maintenance, I always find trackless rides to be more immersive, exciting and variable over omnimover rides. The step-down comparing an older ride like Haunted Mansion to Ratatouille has nothing (to me) to do with the ride system - it's more of a design and scope issue. I've seen some people say they all feel the same, but omni rides feel the same, if not more so than trackless. It's the theming around them that makes them excellent rides. To compare Ratatouille to Rise is to compare a tv dinner to 5-course meal from Gusteau's.
Why are people so sick of / annoyed with trackless but not omni? Trackless feels like an evolution over omni in everything except down time and ride capacity.
Just curious people's reasoning.
There is an easy way to win. I have won every time. Morning Vq, afternoon and EMH.I hope so. I never win at the lottery. I would love to know what eventually means to Disney.
How to win easy?There is an easy way to win. I have won every time. Morning Vq, afternoon and EMH.
Can Figment be considered an omnimover if it stops moving at various points (on purpose)?That's true. I actually like the main show scene and the Ursula animatronic... but it definitely has awful story pacing and is missing some scenes.
And then yeah, even though I don't hate it I can't really think of a single omnimover outside of Nemo I would "take" Mermaid over lol. Maybe current Figment? Which isn't a traditional omnimover anyway.
A quick Google search says it is.Can Figment be considered an omnimover if it stops moving at various points (on purpose)?
No. It's described as "Omnimover-like" but it isn't a true Omnimover.Can Figment be considered an omnimover if it stops moving at various points (on purpose)?
I believe the original JII was an omnimover. Perhaps @marni1971 could explain how the current system differs.No. It's described as "Omnimover-like" but it isn't a true Omnimover.
Figment is more of a classic Fantasyland dark ride that stops at specific scenes, but certainly not an Omnimover. An Omnimover has to have consistent movement.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.