Jayspency
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
and FOP!Well, on the bright side, at least the long lines that the Encanto ride will supposedly have will mean shorter lines for Kilimanjaro Safaris. Hopefully.
and FOP!Well, on the bright side, at least the long lines that the Encanto ride will supposedly have will mean shorter lines for Kilimanjaro Safaris. Hopefully.
I think that depends on whether the new land draws additional people in or not and also whether people spend the same amount of time at the park. If the same number of visitors come to AK and stay the same amount of time then in theory the lines for everything else should drop as people skip other stuff to stand in line for Encanto. This may be my personal bias, but I can’t imagine too many people will skip the safari since it’s the highlight of the park. A ride like Navi River would be much more likely to see a decrease in lines since it’s not a must do for a lot of people. I think most people will probably just stay a little longer to make up for the longer waits for new attractions. DAK still lacks enough rides to make it a park where there is not enough time to do everything in a day so you are forced to chose between 1 ride or another and it still won’t be after this project is over.Well, on the bright side, at least the long lines that the Encanto ride will supposedly have will mean shorter lines for Kilimanjaro Safaris. Hopefully.
AK has so few attractions that anything added can only help. If you are buying a one day, one park ticket, you sure as heck will want to get your money's worth and stay as long as possible. That is why they need to add several attractions, and not just a net of one.I think that depends on whether the new land draws additional people in or not and also whether people spend the same amount of time at the park. If the same number of visitors come to AK and stay the same amount of time then in theory the lines for everything else should drop as people skip other stuff to stand in line for Encanto. This may be my personal bias, but I can’t imagine too many people will skip the safari since it’s the highlight of the park. A ride like Navi River would be much more likely to see a decrease in lines since it’s not a must do for a lot of people. I think most people will probably just stay a little longer to make up for the longer waits for new attractions. DAK still lacks enough rides to make it a park where there is not enough time to do everything in a day so you are forced to chose between 1 ride or another and it still won’t be after this project is over.
I don’t know why you say supposedly as if Encanto is not one of the most popular recent Disney IPs. Kids are absolutely obsessed with it. I make it a habit to not spend too much time around kids but for my volunteer hours last year I ended up doing work at 6 different after school cares and day cares and all they wanted was Encanto and Moana all day.Well, on the bright side, at least the long lines that the Encanto ride will supposedly have will mean shorter lines for Kilimanjaro Safaris. Hopefully.
I don’t necessarily disagree that they will eventually scale back the emphasis on real animals, I also do not foresee this happening any time in the near or even somewhat distant future.I cannot see how AK will continue the way it has already. Unlike Epcot & MK which have retained much of it original feel and developed a hybrid, I personally feel AK will develop and totally change beyond its original conception. Just like DHS. That park originally was about Lost & Current Hollywood celebration. It no longer has any first day attractions or anything that harks back to that outside Indy, ToT and the shows. AK will over time see less animals. As it does cuts will be made to adding more. It will become secondary to the rides and the themed areas that are not directly linked to animals and conservation (Some say we get this with Bugs replacement and Encanto). It will naturally avoid the pathway that Seaworld has and become a theme park with a akward outdated tag on of animals. Instead it wil morph into 'animal themed' rather than about 'physical animals, zoo and conservation'
I don’t think I would put epcot and “maintaining original feel” in the same sentence. Unless you’re referring to world showcaseI cannot see how AK will continue the way it has already. Unlike Epcot & MK which have retained much of it original feel and developed a hybrid, I personally feel AK will develop and totally change beyond its original conception. Just like DHS. That park originally was about Lost & Current Hollywood celebration. It no longer has any first day attractions or anything that harks back to that outside Indy, ToT and the shows. AK will over time see less animals. As it does cuts will be made to adding more. It will become secondary to the rides and the themed areas that are not directly linked to animals and conservation (Some say we get this with Bugs replacement and Encanto). It will naturally avoid the pathway that Seaworld has and become a theme park with a akward outdated tag on of animals. Instead it wil morph into 'animal themed' rather than about 'physical animals, zoo and conservation'
I mean as much as Future World has changed in terms of ride lineup and the spine, I don't know that they've really removed the general feel that EPCOT has always carried with it as much as people like to make out that they have. It looks a little different, but it doesn't feel any different to me than it has my entire life, even if it's gone through a lot of shifting from how I knew it. It's different, but feels familiar at the same time. Walking through the entrance and headed for Spaceship Earth feels the same way it always has. Cutting around SSE to head to the Seas and the Land feels like it always has.I don’t think I would put epcot and “maintaining original feel” in the same sentence. Unless you’re referring to world showcase
I don’t know if that’s true or not. I feel the opposite. If you do this park strictly for the rides I would agree, but Animal Kingdom is much more than its individual rides for me.I think that depends on whether the new land draws additional people in or not and also whether people spend the same amount of time at the park. If the same number of visitors come to AK and stay the same amount of time then in theory the lines for everything else should drop as people skip other stuff to stand in line for Encanto. This may be my personal bias, but I can’t imagine too many people will skip the safari since it’s the highlight of the park. A ride like Navi River would be much more likely to see a decrease in lines since it’s not a must do for a lot of people. I think most people will probably just stay a little longer to make up for the longer waits for new attractions. DAK still lacks enough rides to make it a park where there is not enough time to do everything in a day so you are forced to chose between 1 ride or another and it still won’t be after this project is over.
Yeah, if you just count numbers on a map i get how people can complain, and yes DAK should ideally be expanding and not replacing but still, compared to DHS Animal Kingdom feels like such a complete park and experience to me.If you do the rides, shows and walkthroughs then this park is easily a full day park. It’s also a gorgeous park to walk around. If your only intention is to see how fast you can get through a ride then maybe I guess.
I don’t disagree that AK can be a full day park even before these changes. With multi-day park tickets I still almost always allocate 2 days during any trip and spend more time not on rides than on, but I don’t think I’m a typical visitor and I also don’t usually stay from rope drop to close either. This project will make the former Dinoland area much more popular and will spread crowds around. A lot of people today head to Pandora first but if these 2 rides get longer lines which is certainly very likely it may result in the crowds being spread differently early in the day which is good. There is not a net increase in capacity overall but I think this change maybe results in people staying longer in the park anyway and since the 2 rides won’t rely on live animals it could help if they eventually look to extend hours into the night again some day.I don’t know if that’s true or not. I feel the opposite. If you do this park strictly for the rides I would agree, but Animal Kingdom is much more than its individual rides for me.
If you do the rides, shows and walkthroughs then this park is easily a full day park. It’s also a gorgeous park to walk around. If your only intention is to see how fast you can get through a ride then maybe I guess.
I think this addition just cements Animal Kingdom as a full day park for me and I suspect many others.
I also have a feeling we will hear about another addition down the road. Just a gut feeling though. I also think Lion King would be a perfect addition to this park.
i really do hope we get another world region at some point. Antarctica might be a tough sell unless it's entirely indoors haha, but Australia seems like it'd be a great fit! (and we can finally get a Rescuers ride!)I also agree that a true expansion of the park down the road should be in the works. The Lion King ride in Africa would be great and there’s a large expansion area past Asia that could be a whole different geographic area….Australia or even an Antarctica themed area could be really cool. If/when they do this they could bring back the night show and try again at extended evening hours.
I mean as much as Future World has changed in terms of ride lineup and the spine, I don't know that they've really removed the general feel that EPCOT has always carried with it as much as people like to make out that they have. It looks a little different, but it doesn't feel any different to me than it has my entire life, even if it's gone through a lot of shifting from how I knew it. It's different, but feels familiar at the same time. Walking through the entrance and headed for Spaceship Earth feels the same way it always has. Cutting around SSE to head to the Seas and the Land feels like it always has.
Epcot feels nothing like it did during its first 10-12 years of operation. But since you said it feels the same, then it must be true.I mean as much as Future World has changed in terms of ride lineup and the spine, I don't know that they've really removed the general feel that EPCOT has always carried with it as much as people like to make out that they have. It looks a little different, but it doesn't feel any different to me than it has my entire life, even if it's gone through a lot of shifting from how I knew it. It's different, but feels familiar at the same time. Walking through the entrance and headed for Spaceship Earth feels the same way it always has. Cutting around SSE to head to the Seas and the Land feels like it always has.
I keep bringing it up to Josh at park heads meetings.Antarctica might be a tough sell unless it's entirely indoors haha
I would have thought you’d have more pull, given your position within the Parks division. Maybe he’s afraid you’ll eat too much fish?I keep bringing it up to Josh at park heads meetings.
I was only asking for what they spent on SWL, too!I would have thought you’d have more pull, given your position within the Parks division. Maybe he’s afraid you’ll eat too much fish?
I was only asking for what they spent on SWL, too!
Mention "Starcruiser on Hoth" and see if anyone bites.I keep bringing it up to Josh at park heads meetings.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.