Or the literal minaret at Morocco Pavilion, the Temple of Heaven at China Pavilion, the Khmer Temples of the Jungle Cruise, the Hindu (judging by architecture) Temple of the Forbidden Eye at Disneyland, the garden of Polynesian deities at Disneyland, the graves with Christian symbols (ie: crosses and angels) at The Haunted Mansion, the Yeti shrine and Yeti temple at DAK, and many more subtle references to religions used to make the area more immersive!Or the building known as the Stave Church.
Not to mention the massive statue of St Gabriel and the winged lion is St Mark. The giant tower is also the bell tower of St Mark’s cathedral in Venice.
I think the Dinosaur ride is fairly popular, but the land is not. I've really only seen people talk positively about that land in theme park fanatic circles & it's usually just about the story, not the quality of the land itself.The weirdest part to me is how on the nose they are about this replacing Dinoland and the insinuation that it's a bad area (it isn't). They wouldn't even dare say "It's Tough to be a Bug" when announcing the new Zootopia show that's actually happening... but they seem really proud that they want to replace specifically Dinoland?
They even made sure to include literal dinosaur emojis in a tweet pretty much saying they are getting rid of all dinosaurs in the park. I just think it's really weird that it's not like any other retheme they've announced.
I think an Alebrije flat ride where Triceratop Spin was could be the route they pursueI really hope Coco doesn't come to Animal Kingdom. You can stretch Encanto & Indy to fit Animal Kingdom but there's no way to make Coco work. It'll be even worse if it's just for a flat ride or restaurant; the theme doesn't fit & then they're wasting the IP on something stupid like that.
Ehhh. Save Coco for something better & don't stretch it to fit into AK.I think an Alebrije flat ride where Triceratop Spin was could be the route they pursue
I agree but it would seem to check all the right boxesEhhh. Save Coco for something better & don't stretch it to fit into AK.
I disagree. The EMV isn’t about thrill, but immersion. In Indy, the vehicle mimics dropping down steps timed to the music, which only sells the attraction even more. Dino doesn’t have any of that.Is Indy really a thrill attraction, though? I've never been on it, but from videos it looks like the EMV motion is secondary to what actually makes it a great attraction. Like, you could turn off the vehicle motion and it would still be fantastic.
Yeah you're definitely right lolI agree but it would seem to check all the right boxes
Yeah you're definitely right lol
But since they already revised the AK plans to fit better into that park, hopefully they'll know better than to do something like that. If it's just a flat ride then it doesn't need to be IP themed; I can get the mandate for major attractions to be IP themed since they think that's a draw & it is to an extent, but no one's coming to a park for a Coco themed carousel lmao
Which is okay, but should only be done if there is a second more robust Coco ride as well. But the concept art doesn’t seem to suggest anything like that and it’s sad.I think an Alebrije flat ride where Triceratop Spin was could be the route they pursue
I would think the Reimagine Tomorrow diversity initiatives also give Coco an additional push for inclusion within the plansA case could be made for doing it even if people are flocking in droves to Animal Kingdom to ride a mythical creatures carousel. I see it as a possibility. Coco doesn't exactly fit DAK but the logic of having the Alebrije animals in that land makes sense. As far as IP goes, it's an easy add. The land would need a good mix of high thrill and no thrill attractions.
Nothing about Coco really lends itself to Animal Kingdom except for the Alebrije-angle. So it's probably a one and done if they do it at all. The IP has a greater chance in MK but I can see them throwing it in this lot just to satisfy the IP mandate and assuming it's borrowed concepts from Beyond Big Thunder.Which is okay, but should only be die if there is a second more robust Coco ride as well. But the concept art doesn’t seem to suggest anything like that and it’s sad.
If they are going to pump all this money into redoing Dinoland, they should net at least 1 additional ride (not only the PW replacement but something else)
I really hope Coco doesn't come to Animal Kingdom. You can stretch Encanto & Indy to fit Animal Kingdom but there's no way to make Coco work. It'll be even worse if it's just for a flat ride or restaurant; the theme doesn't fit & then they're wasting the IP on something stupid like that.
Save Coco for the Beyond Big Thunder plans. I actually really like that plan & Big Thunder going into Mexico/Coco works really well.
I disagree. The EMV isn’t about thrill, but immersion. In Indy, the vehicle mimics dropping down steps timed to the music, which only sells the attraction even more. Dino doesn’t have any of that.
100%. I think Coco could make for a really cool ride too, so I'd be worried they'd cancel the MK plans for that movie if they give it something stupid in AK.I agree - guess you could stretch it with the spirit animals but definitely better in MK
And would fit the Beyond Big Thunder if you continue the geography down South from the US west Coast of Big Thunder
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.