News 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

999th Happy Haunt

Well-Known Member
Jurassic Park is pretty lousy for people who want to experience dinosaurs in their majesty and glory. That land treats them as monsters/threats. There's absolutely a market in theme parks to experience seeing and learning about dinosaurs as a part of nature which is not filled by Uni.
I mean the first half of River Adventure is more calm and “majestic” than any part of Dinosaur.
 

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Original Poster
I guess it's not at all surprising, but it's a little disappointing to see all the sites reporting this as an "announcement", when they made it clear that this is still blue sky planning and may or may not actually happen.
Well I didn't, if that's any consolation lol

 

MichRX7

Well-Known Member
So, take away the unique (albeit spine-wrenching as I get older) dinosaur ride for a clone of Disneyland's Indiana Jones ride? If I'm reading that right, are they supposed to think we take that as a positive?
 

tanc

Premium Member
It'd be cooler if Dinosaur was changed to take place in South America, alternatively changing it back to Countdown to Extinction would be even cooler I think. I really like how WDW has an exclusive theme of the ride. I've only ridden Indy in Tokyo, but I do appreciate the charm that WDW the clone has.
 

jpinkc

Well-Known Member
So, take away the unique (albeit spine-wrenching as I get older) dinosaur ride for a clone of Disneyland's Indiana Jones ride? If I'm reading that right, are they supposed to think we take that as a positive?
I agree I dont see the Clone of Indy from DL as being anything to get excited over (its just a reskin of the existing ride). AK does need to do something with Dino Land. Maybe make it a Indy Flume ride that could work but just a pipe dream as that would cost $$$$ vs cloning the existing attraction in a building that already exists with the I believe the same ride system already in place as DL.
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
I mean the first half of River Adventure is more calm and “majestic” than any part of Dinosaur.

Absolutely. As I have often mentioned on here, I would love to have a ride that is basically the first part of JRA but longer and that's the ride. Just a sedate boat ride seeing and learning about dinosaurs.

So my point is that there certainly is the potential to do something like that and differentiate a "dinosaur land" from what exists at Uni. Were I to run Disney, I would add to Dinoland and create the family friendly ride (picture something like UoE's dinos) to compliment Dinosaur (the ride) and make a dinosaur based land that is distinct from Uni. But disney doesn't generally seem interested in doing that kind of project any more.
 

zipadee999

Well-Known Member
Absolutely. As I have often mentioned on here, I would love to have a ride that is basically the first part of JRA but longer and that's the ride. Just a sedate boat ride seeing and learning about dinosaurs.

So my point is that there certainly is the potential to do something like that and differentiate a "dinosaur land" from what exists at Uni. Were I to run Disney, I would add to Dinoland and create the family friendly ride (picture something like UoE's dinos) to compliment Dinosaur (the ride) and make a dinosaur based land that is distinct from Uni. But disney doesn't generally seem interested in doing that kind of project any more.
Uni actually considered that as one of their first triceratops encounter replacements which would’ve been a relaxing Omnimover through the hatchery and basement of the discovery center before seeing some adult dinos sleeping/eating and then disembarking. It would’ve been around 7 minutes supposedly and was meant to contrast with the intensity of river adventure. The bottom line seems to say that people want to be thrilled by Dinos and care more about the fantastical lense rather than the scientific one. An attraction like that could be a decently popular C ticket but people want to be thrilled by the headliner of the land.

There probably isn’t any world where dinosaur or something similar wouldn’t be the E ticket of Dinoland but the Chester and Hester area should’ve been developed as the boat cruise proposal or another way to see actual dinosaurs in a tranquil no height-requirement setting
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Uni actually considered that as one of their first triceratops encounter replacements which would’ve been a relaxing Omnimover through the hatchery and basement of the discovery center before seeing some adult dinos sleeping/eating and then disembarking. It would’ve been around 7 minutes supposedly and was meant to contrast with the intensity of river adventure. The bottom line seems to say that people want to be thrilled by Dinos and care more about the fantastical lense rather than the scientific one. An attraction like that could be a decently popular C ticket but people want to be thrilled by the headliner of the land.

There probably isn’t any world where dinosaur or something similar wouldn’t be the E ticket of Dinoland but the Chester and Hester area should’ve been developed as the boat cruise proposal or another way to see actual dinosaurs in a tranquil no height-requirement setting

People want the fantasy of the Dinosaur's existing world more than they do the reality. They can want both and one can inspire the other, but just as Mainstreet USA Exists.

People want nostalgia and romanticized turn of the century, the majority don't want to actually walk through a turn of the century street and into non air conditioned gift shops.

Uni to this day still has Dino meet and greets. Yes Raptor Encounter gets the viral videos of scares, but you also have the baby raptor meets and occasional Triceratops meets and hatchings witnessed in the Discovery Center where kids explore and learn what Jurassic Park does.
Camp Jurassic is also far more epic than any other playground at a major theme park. It took what was great about Tom Sawyer and elevated it into Spielberg's cinematic concept.
 

Bleed0range

Well-Known Member
I agree I dont see the Clone of Indy from DL as being anything to get excited over (its just a reskin of the existing ride). AK does need to do something with Dino Land. Maybe make it a Indy Flume ride that could work but just a pipe dream as that would cost $$$$ vs cloning the existing attraction in a building that already exists with the I believe the same ride system already in place as DL.

Tbh, I love the Indy ride and I’ve wanted it for 20+ years so I’m okay with it ultimately haha. I would be excited since I almost never get to Disneyland vs WDW.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
This is likely a $1B+ project and the only difference you've made in AK's capacity is the throughput difference between PW and whatever Encanto is
Unfortunately this has been Disneys problem for over 20yrs. They don't seem to really care about capacity.
My biggest gripe is just the shortsided nature of their planning
Well when the guy running the company is Bob Shortsighted Iger, this is the end result. A bunch of stuff hodgepodged wherever they can shove it.
 

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
So, will we get real/live snakes with Indy and donkeys with Encanto?
Goodbye Triceratops Spin, hello...

1694460526907.png
 

Twirlnhurl

Well-Known Member
Uni actually considered that as one of their first triceratops encounter replacements which would’ve been a relaxing Omnimover through the hatchery and basement of the discovery center before seeing some adult dinos sleeping/eating and then disembarking. It would’ve been around 7 minutes supposedly and was meant to contrast with the intensity of river adventure.
Is there any place I could read more about that concept? I've never heard of it before.

I love Velocicoaster (it is one of my absolute favorite rollercoasters in the world), but a no-height requirement family friendly dark ride would be so much better for the park as a whole. Both Universal parks are seriously lacking in that regard.
 
Last edited:

zipadee999

Well-Known Member
Is there any place I could read more about that concept? I've never heard of it before.

I love Velocicoaster (it is one of my absolute favorite rollercoasters in the work), but a no-height requirement family friendly dark ride would be so much better for the park as a whole. Both Universal parks are seriously lacking in that regard.
There’s a thread about the early stages of Velocicoaster on one of the universal forums, it may have been IU I believe, that has been going since triceratops encounter had yet to close. In the first hundred pages or so certain reputable people talk about this concept as one of the plans that could replace triceratops.

It’s really cool because you can see the idea and rumor process on what was happening with that spot of land all the way through the 2010s until VC was eventually announced.

At some point along the line universal decided that the Omnimover wasn’t thrilling enough and the rumor changed to an Amber Mine wooden coaster that would’ve been an extension of camp Jurassic! They stuck with that for a little while before eventually deciding to go bigger and better with VC.

If you just search ‘Velocicoaster forum thread’ on google it should be one of the first results.

(I’m purposely being a bit vague so I don’t get in trouble for promoting another forum lol)
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom