Dranth
Well-Known Member
So?IT STILL LOST MONEY!
What does that have to do with the article or did you not bother to read it?
So?IT STILL LOST MONEY!
Yes. In it's theatrical run, using the rule of thumb, it lost money in that window.IT STILL LOST MONEY!
People do not care about articles here… all that matters is Disney lostSo?
What does that have to do with the article or did you not bother to read it?
I've noticed.People do not care about articles here… all that matters is Disney lost
That has not actually been proven. Its only been assumed by certain posters based on the "estimates" using the rule of thumb.IT STILL LOST MONEY!
Its an article on https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/ !!!!!! its literally worthless!!!!!People do not care about articles here… all that matters is Disney lost
It didn't make money either.That has not actually been proven. Its only been assumed by certain posters based on the "estimates" using the rule of thumb.
No one here has the real numbers, so its cannot be said with any confidence this specific movie lost money during theatrical.
All it has to do is make $1 more than it cost to be considered “making money”. And again since no one here has any real numbers it again cannot be said with any confidence that this particular film didn’t make any money during theatrical.It didn't make money either.
You just like to argue don't you?All it has to do is make $1 more than it cost to be considered “making money”. And again since no one here has any real numbers it again cannot be said with any confidence that this particular film didn’t make any money during theatrical.
The only thing that can be said is that based on the “estimates” using the rule of thumb that it “appears” this film didn’t make money during theatrical.
The amateur Hollywood accountants around here really need to stop throwing around numbers and judgements like they actually counted every dollar themselves.
Not really relevant to the conversation.You just like to argue don't you?
If you'd like to discuss what I posted, or refute it with some data with real numbers not estimates, then I'd be happy to discuss it. Otherwise this add nothing to the conversation.
Yup. You like to argue. It's a bad habit.Not really relevant to the conversation.
If you'd like to discuss what I posted, or refute it with some data with real numbers not estimates, then I'd be happy to discuss it. Otherwise this add nothing to the conversation.
That's true. And I've tried to be conservative based on the numbers that we see. I don't know the true numbers any more than you do.The only thing that can be said is that based on the “estimates” using the rule of thumb that it “appears” this film didn’t make money during theatrical.
My question for you is this. When you see estimates on budgets and marketing, and the same basic numbers come up in multiple places. Why should we think that they are so far off? Since I'm one of those amateur Hollywood accountants, I'd love to know. I understand that these things are not going to be 100% accurate. But if these numbers were really that far off, or at least off enough that something like Elemental could be profitable right now. I can't see Disney continuing to allow these numbers to run rampant and define the narrative without stepping in.The amateur Hollywood accountants around here really need to stop throwing around numbers and judgements like they actually counted every dollar themselves.
Again not really relevant to the conversation.Yup. You like to argue. It's a bad habit.
Elemental lost Millions and Millions of dollars for Pixar. The Elemental production budget was $200 Million.
If you assume they spent $100 Million on marketing, Elemental lost $94 Million
If you assume they spent $75 Million on marketing, Elemental lost $69 Million
If you assume they spent $50 Million on marketing, Elemental lost $44 Million
If you assume they spent $15 Million on marketing, Elemental lost $9 Million
Domestic Box Office Take = $90 Million (60% of ticket sales)
Overseas Box Office Take = $116 Million (40% of ticket sales)
Global Box Office Take = $206 Million
View attachment 737903
Exactly! That means Pixar is making progress again. I think those guys prefer to be negative instead being positive. So sad!Yes I understand what the "rule of thumb" estimations get you, though I believe your calculations are slightly off as the "numbers" hasn't properly updated for international.
But Disney has already stated the movie is profitable during theatrical. So clearly they have numbers we don't have access to.
For example what if the budget wasn't $200M but rather $195M, and they got a higher take on the international say 50% instead of 40%. That would put it close to turning a profit especially when you start lowering the marketing cost.
The point is that while I understand that for discussion purposes some numbers need to be used since a studio won't provide any comment on them. But once the studio themselves start saying they will make a profit during theatrical those estimated numbers should get thrown out the window.
The thing is Disney has already stated in the same media that put out the estimates in the first place that Elemental will be profitable during theatrical. I mean sure I guess it could all be PR spin, but if there is a write down for the film then it would be publicly known so it makes no sense to say its profitable in the media.That's true. And I've tried to be conservative based on the numbers that we see. I don't know the true numbers any more than you do.
My question for you is this. When you see estimates on budgets and marketing, and the same basic numbers come up in multiple places. Why should we think that they are so far off? Since I'm one of those amateur Hollywood accountants, I'd love to know. I understand that these things are not going to be 100% accurate. But if these numbers were really that far off, or at least off enough that something like Elemental could be profitable right now. I can't see Disney continuing to allow these numbers to run rampant and define the narrative without stepping in.
We all know what the rules of thumb is when it comes to this stuff. And as far as I have been able to find it is reasonably accurate. Sure if it's something where it's 20/30mil up or down, it could be a toss up. I just don't see the argument that Elemental is that close to profiting theatricality. You would need to under cut the reported budget by at least 40mil, and marketing by about the same. Then that would put you at an estimated profit. At best it is still down by a 60mil estimate (doubtful they only spent 50 mil to market) at worst it looks to be closer to 100mil down. It grew some legs overseas for sure, but I don't see it going green. But hey, stranger things have happened.
Since I'm one of those amateur Hollywood accountants, I'd love to know. I understand that these things are not going to be 100% accurate. But if these numbers were really that far off, or at least off enough that something like Elemental could be profitable right now. I can't see Disney continuing to allow these numbers to run rampant and define the narrative without stepping in..
Will “Elemental” be profitable?
We have a lot of different revenue streams, but at the box office we’re looking at now, it should do better than break even theatrically. And then we have revenue from streaming, theme parks and consumer products. This will certainly be a profitable film for the Disney company.
The thing is Disney has already stated in the same media that put out the estimates in the first place that Elemental will be profitable during theatrical.
Anyways as I stated above once the studio starts saying the movie turns a profit, we should drop the "estimate" calculation.
The only thing I've seen from Disney on this film was from Morris. He saidBut Disney has already stated the movie is profitable during theatrical. So clearly they have numbers we don't have access to.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.