I should come up with methods and concepts that were inexpensive and/or revenue generating ideas.
Ouch. That's what Tony said? Sadly that's where we're at now, with practically every new ride tied to Disney characters.
It's funny. I don't think that's what Tony had in mind when he was designing Big Thunder.
I miss the old days, when WDI can go all out creative without thinking about tie-ins and create fantastic experiences like Epcot Center. Now granted I'm not a big fan of Everest, but we need more original rides like that around the parks. When Walt designed Disneyland, where were all the attractions tied to characters? Fantasyland. That's how he had it and that's how I'd like it again. I mean sure the park is called "Disney"land and so people expect Disney characters and to a certain extent, advertising. But what they've been doing lately is pushing it, to the point that even the stroller name tags have ads for upcoming dvds.:dazzle: I want to go to the parks to get away, not get countless ads stuffed down my throat.
I was actually thinking to myself today on the way to work (the park), what makes an attraction timeless? Do you think a ride like The Seas with Nemo & Friends will be a classic 20yrs from now? Of course not, what do rides like HM, Pirates (pre-refurb), ToT, Space Mt, Big Thunder, Jungle Cruise, Small World, and the original Subs have in common? No characters, which makes it that much easier to remain relevant into the future. Now granted I'm not saying we can't have any rides without characters. Splash is an exception and is a great experience. Toy Story Mania, although I'd rather if it wasn't a character-driven ride (cause I don't know how popular Toy Story would be say 10yrs from now), has high-replay value due to a fun and entertaining concept.
So yeah, I'm not saying no characters, but I'm saying more originality. Which is why I'm in the pool of people who want ideas like Mysterious Island and Stormrider to come stateside, as well as the addition of new lands like Beastly Kingdom. Whenever I'm walking around a park like TDS with all its original attractions and entertainment, I always think to myself just how popular these things would be if they were at WDW. Or if I'm watching a show like Electrical Parade Dreamlights, I can't help but wonder just how awesome it'd be to see them on the streets of MK. The parks, especially MK, needs anything new it can get, and I guess the thing that frustrates me sometimes are that there are great ideas and concepts that exist in the international parks that the US parks don't have, but could be brought over. For example, like how DLP got Fantillusion from TDL. Now of course taking ideas from other parks isn't always a good thing since the parks need their own individuality, but when you've got something like Spectro, that's been running for the most part since '91, it's a no brainer not to bring in a newer and grander parade from another park. WDW guests still love Spectro (don't get me wrong, I love it too) but WDW guests also don't know what they're missing. Because the guests still love the parade, management figures the guests are still happy, so they don't introduce new parades which leads to entertainment getting stale. Don't even get me started on CADCT.:fork:
Sorry to bother you guys with my huge rant, that quote just kind of ticked me off and I needed to get that out of my system.
whylightbulb, may I ask if you can share with us what you worked on when you were at WDI?