In so many posts that I read, there seems to be some question about the fruition of Avatar Land. There's lots of evidence to support this announced project, yet so many doubt it will come to be. Why is this?
In so many posts that I read, there seems to be some question about the fruition of Avatar Land. There's lots of evidence to support this announced project, yet so many doubt it will come to be. Why is this?
There are quite a lot of threads on this. Do a search on Avatar to have a read.In so many posts that I read, there seems to be some question about the fruition of Avatar Land. There's lots of evidence to support this announced project, yet so many doubt it will come to be. Why is this?
Care to share all of this evidence?
Care to share all of this evidence?
In so many posts that I read, there seems to be some question about the fruition of Avatar Land. There's lots of evidence to support this announced project, yet so many doubt it will come to be. Why is this?
...There was the announcement to the shareholders, that while domestic spending will be reduced, the Avatar project is still planned...
Sorry, wasn't an announcement. It was a reluctant response to a shareholder question, after Iger spent a considerable amount of time detailing all of DP's current capital improvements, while excluding Avatarland.
Sort of under duress.Regardless, it was said publicly on record.
Berate me all you'd like, but this is the first time I've never liked something that WDI had in the works. I'm sorry if I've upset anybody because of my lack of excitement.
In so many posts that I read, there seems to be some question about the fruition of Avatar Land. There's lots of evidence to support this announced project, yet so many doubt it will come to be. Why is this?
With that being said, having an entire area based on the film seems a little out-of-place in a Disney theme park, at least it does to me. I don't doubt that it would be beautiful to look at, especially if the area were to extend the park's hours. I could just imagine how beautiful everything would light up during the evening, but... I see little logic as to how it'd fit in with the general theme of the rest of the park: animals.
If anything, Avatar was a word to the wise about nature. I think that sort of thing would have fit better in Epcot, if that were the case, but even if it were to relocate in Epcot, it'd still be one massive leap over the metaphorical shark. Yes, it featured a few mythical animals, but they weren't a primarily huge part of the movie, I thought (then again, I've only seen the film twice, neither of which were very recent, so I could be wrong).
So, then how does Expedition Everest fit in with the general theme of the rest of the park?
Mythical animals like, perhaps, a yeti?
You're kidding, right? One ride, which heavily and primarily features the yeti, simply does not compare to an entire land based on a film that has little to do with animals. I fail to see your point, just as you appear to fail at seeing mine.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.