The Empress Lilly
Well-Known Member
Totally! Thank God I'm not alone!is anyone else tired of hearing about rockwork?
What ever happened to the art of making show buildings appear to be Bavarian villages?
Totally! Thank God I'm not alone!is anyone else tired of hearing about rockwork?
I get the hat as a symbol. It has become an icon. Maybe in the wrong place, but still an icon. The problem is that it is just a hat, not an attraction, like at the other parks.
It has shows and a place to eat, plus BBB. The hat has nothing but a pin shop.Just to play devil's advocate because I honestly don't care if the hat stays or goes, Cinderella Castle is not an attraction. It is an icon.
is anyone else tired of hearing about rockwork?
Just to play devil's advocate because I honestly don't care if the hat stays or goes, Cinderella Castle is not an attraction. It is an icon.
You assume they are capable of building multiple rides in an immersive land for that investment. I have doubts, major doubts.
When I think of Hollywood, the stars walk of fame and the Chinese theater are the first things that come to mind. I loved how Disney once used the theater as a centerpiece to the park...regardless of it being based off of a real theater, it automatically reminds me of
Hollywood and the movies.
The hat is just a giant waste of space.
The Earful tower isn't much better. Seriously...a water tower with Mickey ears as your park
weenie? No thanks. I'd rather see ToT made the
icon over them using the Earful tower. That
thing has nothing on the Tree of Life or
Cinderella Castle or Spaceship Earth. It's just a
stinking water tower!
I feel like they briefly tried making ToT the icon in the 90s, before the hat. Maybe I'm mistaken. At any rate, ToT seems a.) not fully representative of the park, and b.) a little too rundown and destroyed looking to be a gleaming park icon.When I think of Hollywood, the stars walk of fame and the Chinese theater are the first things that come to mind. I loved how Disney once used the theater as a centerpiece to the park...regardless of it being based off of a real theater, it automatically reminds me of Hollywood and the movies.
The hat is just a giant waste of space.
The Earful tower isn't much better. Seriously...a water tower with Mickey ears as your park weenie? No thanks. I'd rather see ToT made the icon over them using the Earful tower. That thing has nothing on the Tree of Life or Cinderella Castle or Spaceship Earth. It's just a stinking water tower!
I'm so torn with the whole hat vs theater debate.
Yes, the hat is borderline offensive. It's tacky and overstated. And it serves no purpose to the park, other than an eye catcher.
But the theater isn't Disney. It's a replica of Grauman's Theater in L.A. When I see the theater, I think of L.A. not of Hollywood Studios. I understand it's trying to tie to a pre existing trademark of Hollywood, but I think that the center of a Disney Park should be something unique. Something that only exists in the park. Something new and exciting. At least the hat has that going for it.
I vote for a new centerpiece, something taking the best of both ideas and combining them. That's what I would like to see.
Off topic, but what is DCA's icon? Mickey's Fun Wheel? Grizzly River Run's peak?
Off topic, but what is DCA's icon? Mickey's Fun Wheel? Grizzly River Run's peak?
The tower (non functional) was the icon since every studios had a water tower in the 30s for fire fighting. They all had their logo on the side, and thus the public knew which complex was which by the tower. It became the most recognisable part of a Hollywood studio.I think the Earful tower was probably a result of the overall rush to get the park completed. I don't know this, just speculation, but it seems a likely reason. Budget and time may have prevented them from creating an attraction based icon. I like the Earful tower, but I understand what you're saying. Maybe someone else around here knows more about why this is?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.