__r.jr
Well-Known Member
Ironic how Disney loves to utilize the term "immersive" to the point of ad nauseum when describing new developmental concepts for its theme park resorts. Yet over the past few decades, what is known it be the first act in its domestic castle parks betrays the weight of that term.
At the risk of sounding hyperbolic, it certainly falls in line what other recent aesthetic desecrations have occurred whether it be the botched forced perspective and architectural redesign in New Orleans Square or the poorly excusable removal of the elemental Waterfall Garden in the Polynesian Village Resort. For me the sticking point has always been not just the dramatic desecrations, but the death by a thousand cuts that have denuded many areas of the resorts and/or parks. Main Street, U.S.A. is the prime example.
Speaking on the general conceptual execution of Main Street, U.S.A. (and not one specifically to any castle park here in the States) it once contained a working bank, the Walt Disney Story, a place to have an old-fashioned photograph taken, a card/book shop, a clock shop, a candle shop, a tobacconist, a magic shop, a flower market, and a cinema showing cartoons. All that fit or came close to the time period. All these establishments were involved to hold conviction for us to believe the environment Disney was attempting to idealize and romanticize is real; to immerse us in a typical late 19th century business thoroughfare, with civic institutions and commerce, where the guest could feel one was actually taking part.
Now it’s generally a little more than a themed shopping mall for Disney merchandise and a backdrop for parades. For many that doesn’t matter. It’s an attitude I have a difficult time understanding. It matters to myself, to others, to the original WED Imagineers... It mattered to Walt Disney.
We live in a time where many people seem to have no historical or aesthetic context for understanding their own experiences. And with the continuedthematic immersion erosion to Main Street, it proves just that.
At the risk of sounding hyperbolic, it certainly falls in line what other recent aesthetic desecrations have occurred whether it be the botched forced perspective and architectural redesign in New Orleans Square or the poorly excusable removal of the elemental Waterfall Garden in the Polynesian Village Resort. For me the sticking point has always been not just the dramatic desecrations, but the death by a thousand cuts that have denuded many areas of the resorts and/or parks. Main Street, U.S.A. is the prime example.
Speaking on the general conceptual execution of Main Street, U.S.A. (and not one specifically to any castle park here in the States) it once contained a working bank, the Walt Disney Story, a place to have an old-fashioned photograph taken, a card/book shop, a clock shop, a candle shop, a tobacconist, a magic shop, a flower market, and a cinema showing cartoons. All that fit or came close to the time period. All these establishments were involved to hold conviction for us to believe the environment Disney was attempting to idealize and romanticize is real; to immerse us in a typical late 19th century business thoroughfare, with civic institutions and commerce, where the guest could feel one was actually taking part.
Now it’s generally a little more than a themed shopping mall for Disney merchandise and a backdrop for parades. For many that doesn’t matter. It’s an attitude I have a difficult time understanding. It matters to myself, to others, to the original WED Imagineers... It mattered to Walt Disney.
We live in a time where many people seem to have no historical or aesthetic context for understanding their own experiences. And with the continued
Last edited: