el_super
Well-Known Member
By that logic... having my car break down is also 'effectively' a blockout date. Just equating your inability to go as 'the same thing' is lazy.
Big difference between some outside event like a car breaking down preventing you from going, and Disney making your admission media invalid for the day.
One thing is based on calendar - one thing is based on dynamic availability. They are not the same thing, and no lazy bridge of words like 'effective' make it as such.
What determines blackout dates: demand projections.
What determines reservation availability: demand projections.
The only real difference between them is that on SOME days Disney allows some fraction of the population to make a reservation to get in, and on other days they do not.
We all assume that Disney is acting in good faith and trying to be responsible toward capacity and attendance, but at what point does this cross into fraud? If they only offered reservations for 10% of Keyholders on any given day? 5%? What if they only offered one reservation to one pre-selected Keyholder purposefully to lock out the others? Does that not seem like fraud?
When you can't use your 'no blackout date' airline miles to book a flight because there are no seats available in that fare class you don't equate lack of seats with blackout dates.
Bad example. Airline miles are usually bonuses or incentives over other purchases. This woman specifically bought a pass to Disneyland that was advertised as having no blockouts, and then was told by Disney she couldn't go.
I don't really feel that she is entitled to anything but a refund on the pass (did she even ask for one?), but I do think that the way Disney represented the passes and availability was misleading.