If nothing else, this would be great!I hope the court case brings out how many tickets vs pass slots there are, what the attendance numbers are, etc... All those things Disney does such a good job of hiding.
Disney's fans will still show up. They are paying far more than $150 currently. And with many jobs no longer being M-F 8-5 and schools being year round for many, off season is greatly diminished. When I was a kid my family would buy day tickets to visit and we'd go about 3-5 times per year.This will Never happen, unless Disney were to substantially lower their daily ticket prices. There are a limited amount of people who would be willing to pay $150+/day to visit the parks, and they would be half empty in all but the busy times of year such as July, August, October & December. That might have worked coming out of a 1 year closure, but it won't work on a regular basis going forward, where people have choices on how to spend their money for social activities. And fewer people visiting the parks means not only less ticket revenue, but also lower revenue from parking, food & merch.
From my understanding, all tiers couldn't get in when availability was gone. They also never said that the park had no availability, but merely the reservations for Keys had no availability.Based on the wording it does not mention park availability is capped differently for AP Holders vs Ticket Holders.
There very well could be a case here. I'm no legal expert but it is misleading to say the park has no availability, but people with tickets or different tiers of pass can still get it. This was never explicitly stated.
The advertising and fine print on the keys does not seem to mention separate availability buckets for them. That is the lawsuit.From my understanding, all tiers couldn't get in when availability was gone. They also never said that the park had no availability, but merely the reservations for Keys had no availability.
The Fine Print is FOR the Keys. Why would they mention availability for the General Admission when this is for the Keys? Subject to availability.The advertising and fine print on the keys does not seem to mention separate availability buckets for them. That is the lawsuit.
Based on the wording it does not mention park availability is capped differently for AP Holders vs Ticket Holders.
There very well could be a case here. I'm no legal expert but it is misleading to say the park has no availability, but people with tickets or different tiers of pass can still get it. This was never explicitly stated.
It’s common knowledge to any frequent Disney visitor that the parks only hit capacity a handful of times per year, I think a judge will see that as what a reasonable person would believe when they say “availability”.Based on the wording it does not mention park availability is capped differently for AP Holders vs Ticket Holders.
There very well could be a case here. I'm no legal expert but it is misleading to say the park has no availability, but people with tickets or different tiers of pass can still get it. This was never explicitly stated.
It's not my suit and I don't own a "Magical Key". But again there is nothing noting that Magic Keys have less availability than tickets. Thats what the lawsuit is about.The Fine Print is FOR the Keys. Why would they mention availability for the General Admission when this is for the Keys? Subject to availability.
It really took some business acumen to come up with your idea and that’s exactly why you’ll never be employed by Disney.Or hopefully just do away with passes as a concept. That is a best case scenario. I'd even settle for one tier of pass at $2,500 per pass, no payment plan, and no blackout/reservations required. Limit them to like 50,000 and you're good.
Disney has nothing to worry about, they say "subject to availability" very clearly. None of these dates were blacked out, they just had all available Key reservations snatched up.
if there were only 3,600 Dream Key holders the reservation thing would be a non-issue.LA Times posted an article today. This was included in the article .
"She is asking the court to certify the complaint as a class-action suit on behalf of the 3,600 people who have purchased Dream Key passes."
It's not my suit and I don't own a "Magical Key". But again there is nothing noting that Magic Keys have less availability than tickets. Thats what the lawsuit is about.
I could see why a customer would find if deceptive that their thousand dollar pass says the park is "sold out" that day but someome with a day ticket can still get in. Especially when Disney never mentioned how availability is split up.
From my knowledge Disney has some of the best lawyers in the world though and wins 99% of their cases.
It’s common knowledge to any frequent Disney visitor that the parks only hit capacity a handful of times per year, I think a judge will see that as what a reasonable person would believe when they say “availability”.
Easy fix, get rid of the reservation system altogether.My two biggest complaints about the pass is:
1. The inability peruse other dates and or change your park without cancelling your current day's reservation or if you are full. I think there should be an option for both without losing what you currently have.
2. Disney really needs an Single Sign On Session when accessing these reservations or have it incorporated into the app. It's a pain to have to log into the site despite the app signing you already in prior.
Disney did make a promise, pretty straightforward, NO BLACK OUT DATES unless they are capacity. Disney has not been full but a very few select days. If Disney allows a person to buy a single day ticket that factually proves they are not full on that day! If single day tickets are available then the pass for 1399.00 should get you in 100% of the time!That is also an ASSUMPTION based on a model that no longer exists - the model before park reservations were used.
The plantiff is trying to make a case out of the idea that Disney has different availability buckets - which is something well within Disney's right to do. The plantiff just ASSUMES their pass is always the highest priority - a promise Disney never made.
You can modify dining reservations this way, surely they can add the same functionality for park reservations? It's asinine how unintuitive and unhelpful the current system is.The inability peruse other dates and or change your park without cancelling your current day's reservation or if you are full. I think there should be an option for both without losing what you currently have.
I'm curious where they made that promise? Not trying to sound contradictory, just wondering because if they did say that then the case has more merit than I first thought.Disney did make a promise, pretty straightforward, NO BLACK OUT DATES unless they are capacity. Disney has not been full but a very few select days. If Disney allows a person to buy a single day ticket that factually proves they are not full on that day! If single day tickets are available then the pass for 1399.00 should get you in 100% of the time!
You can modify dining reservations this way, surely they can add the same functionality for park reservations? It's asinine how unintuitive and unhelpful the current system is.
I'm curious where they made that promise? Not trying to sound contradictory, just wondering because if they did say that then the case has more merit than I first thought.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.