Possibly. If it is a brand new ticket that does not have a finger scan attached to it he could. If it is an existing ticket it would all depend on how the CM handled it. If the CM just resets the scan he could, if they send him to guest services he could not unless he had a fake ID that matched the name on the ticket.Interesting. Though honestly, I'm not smart enough to understand if that means he can get in with another ticket or not.
He was already doing that. I wonder how long it will be before they perma-ban him.
A lot of misunderstanding of the point of the ban going on in this series of posts. Yes, he might well get in, but the risks are very high. The point of the ban is that there person has been warned that any appearance on the owners property is not authorized and will be considered criminal trespass. So, since you know you aren't supposed to be there simply being there IS the crime and no further proof is needed. Criminal trespass and criminal record.
Yes going back on property is the crime, but when he goes to court and Disney fails to produce the security guard from years past to witness the case gets dismissed. There are a lot of variable and as the years go by it gets much harder to make a trespassing charge stick.
Hate to tell you this but people are trespassed all the time and they return all the time. I've known of people to do this, Disney doesn't have a system in place to identify this at least not the high tech fictional super security your thinking of, and often even if they do they don't peruse it after several years have passed. Now if he gets caught doing something stupid years from now they would likely tack the trespassing on to any other charges.
What are you talking about, of course there is no right of appeal for a trespass warning. Trespass charges are what we are talking about, that is a whole different story. There is a burden of proof on Disney's side and then there certainly is a right of appeal for the person being charged.
Sounds like youre contradicting yourself. All that needs to be proven for a tresspass charge to stick at any point in the future is for a tresspass warning to exist(it does) and a witness at some point in the future to testify he attempted to enter.
If any part of the original warning comes up in the case the original people involved Disney security and OCSO will need to be used as witness of how the original warning was issued and that it was issued correctly. There are also a lot of other factors over time like for example if he is accidentally invited to return by Disney this could be used in court.
They specifically waited until the statute of limitations had expired before making it known publicly. Disney cannot peruse trespassing charges, and never gave them any trespass warnings.
It's been a while since I read through their blog, but I remember they mostly took photos and videos. What did they steal?That's interesting and smart, I guess.
I wonder if now that they're known, Disney has told them to cease trespassing or face a lifetime ban. Also, Disney just allowed them to keep the items they stole?
