News 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Well Zootopia only superficially has animals in it; they're basically just people.

Encanto, on the other hand, isn't really any worse (or better) as fit from an IP standpoint, but it's a much better fit from a land standpoint, since they can focus on South America. Zootopia takes place in a city.

Encanto works better for Animal Kingdom than Zootopia even if it's not a great fit; I don't think that should be hard for anyone to grasp.

Yeah, uh huh. Since when is Animal Kingdom about South America? It's supposed to be about ANIMALS. Including fictional ones (remember Beastly Kingdomme?) How hard is THAT for anyone to grasp?
 

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
I'm just happy Indiana Jones is even being considered. I figured Disney was going to throw that series into the vault after Dial of Destiny bombed.

But maybe they've realized why it bombed & aren't going to shelve a previously highly successful IP because of their own mistakes.

Tell me how Indy belongs in Animal Kingdom. What about him, besides his fear of snakes, has anything to do with the park's animal theme?
 

Timothy_Q

Well-Known Member
I think the move from Moana to Encanto is in part because of their desire to have Encanto in the parks quicker than the MK plans would allow.

With Encanto and Moana being the biggest hits of the last decade, and Moana already having a presence at Epcot

Now I'm just curious if the Moana flume will live to see the day somewhere else
 

999th Happy Haunt

Well-Known Member
Tell me how Indy belongs in Animal Kingdom. What about him, besides his fear of snakes, has anything to do with the park's animal theme?
Indy exists in a fairly grounded reality and is often put against the forces of nature in the films. Nature also reclaims pretty much any ancient tomb or temple that Indy explores. It would not be a stretch at all to include a number of animals on one of his adventures.

Let’s not pretend Dinosaur needed a deep message about conservation to fit into the park, it has always been a thrill ride where guests are simply humbled by the power of nature. I have no doubt an Indiana Jones attraction would be able to retain that aspect.

Edit: this isn’t to say Indiana Jones fits just as good as Dinosaur, just saying that it’s totally not as much as a stretch as the other properties considered for this area.
 

SpectreJordan

Well-Known Member
Tell me how Indy belongs in Animal Kingdom. What about him, besides his fear of snakes, has anything to do with the park's animal theme?
That's the main downside to it. I'm sure they can find a way using an artifact or something.

But I'm just happy that corporate is even allowing them to discuss this franchise after that bomb.
 

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Indy exists in a fairly grounded reality and is often put against the forces of nature in the films. Nature also reclaims pretty much any ancient tomb or temple that Indy explores. It would not be a stretch at all to include a number of animals on one of his adventures.

Let’s not pretend Dinosaur needed a deep message about conservation to fit into the park, it has always been a thrill ride where guests are simply humbled by the power of nature. I have no doubt an Indiana Jones attraction would be able to retain that aspect.
Rather, let's not pretend that The Robert Iger Company gives a damn about a park's integrity or meaning. It just sticks IPs anywhere and everywhere. And it's so futile. I've been watching Universal Epic Universe building updates, and oh my god it's going to be epic indeed. Especially the Universal Monsters area. And to think I used to believe that Universal Parks were wannabes. Silly me. I can't wait for Epic to open!
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
Do we think they'll clone an existing Indy or make something new? It would be neat to have it involve dinosaurs in some way with a new story.
Oddly enough there was a novel about him and dinos..
Capture%2Bd%25E2%2580%2599e%25CC%2581cran%2B2018-05-24%2Ba%25CC%2580%2B13.58.56.png
 

DisneyOutsider

Well-Known Member
Is it actually blue sky? This concept art looks really detailed and like they've honed in on things from last year. Maybe the concept hasn't been greenlit to start construction, but I imagine they have money earmarked already so it's just a matter of when rather than just throwing ideas out there like last year, but maybe I'm totally wrong.

I wonder who spearheaded the changes because the plans last year were really bad and felt like an IP mandate. This feels like a more natural progression of the park and like the people in charge actually understood that it would've ruined Animal Kingdom's flawless themed design.
It's pretty clear from the words that they're using that none of this is green-lit. It seems to echo the tone of the D23 Conference blue sky segment.

I don't doubt that it's further along than it was back then... But they stopped short of actually committing to this.
 

haveyoumetmark

Well-Known Member
Indy exists in a fairly grounded reality and is often put against the forces of nature in the films. Nature also reclaims pretty much any ancient tomb or temple that Indy explores. It would not be a stretch at all to include a number of animals on one of his adventures.

Let’s not pretend Dinosaur needed a deep message about conservation to fit into the park, it has always been a thrill ride where guests are simply humbled by the power of nature. I have no doubt an Indiana Jones attraction would be able to retain that aspect.

Edit: this isn’t to say Indiana Jones fits just as good as Dinosaur, just saying that it’s totally not as much as a stretch as the other properties considered for this area.
This is a sophisticated take that’s bound to go over the heads of those who just wanna be upset. But fabulous analysis!
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
Pretty funny that people who screech over the idea of Zootopia (a movie with animals in it) being put into Animal Kingdom are happy with Encanto (a movie NOT about animals) being wedged into Animal Kingdom. Whereas many other people might feel that the real reason Encanto is being shoved into that round hole is that the movie, while a box-office failure, had a song that got popular for some reason. And of course representation had to be shoved into WDW somewhere...:rolleyes:
Yeah, this is where that "Animal" connection fits in..
encanto-antonio-and-animal-friends-1opme3kcrgm8fsft.jpg

Where they probably won't focus on it to make it a Mirabel M&G instead.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Yeah, uh huh. Since when is Animal Kingdom about South America? It's supposed to be about ANIMALS. Including fictional ones (remember Beastly Kingdomme?) How hard is THAT for anyone to grasp?

Animal Kingdom isn't only about animals, but there are a lot of unique animals in South America that Disney could feature if they wanted to. It offers an avenue that could very easily tie into the park's overall themes.

Zootopia isn't about animals. If you think Zootopia is a good fit for Animal Kingdom, you also think Robin Hood is a good fit for Animal Kingdom. It does not offer the avenue that South America does, unless they essentially divorced the characters from the movie entirely -- and then you're still dealing with what are basically people dressed up as animals.

No one is saying this is a perfect fit -- it's certainly not. But it's a much better fit than Zootopia, so there's relief.
 
Last edited:

DKampy

Well-Known Member
I remember everybody complaining about how does Avatar fit into Animal Kingom… and IMO Pandora fits in beautifully with the message and themes of the park

I am just happy that Zootopia has been ditched… although I still don’t like the idea of a show in the Tree of Life… I think ITTBAB is still more appropriate there
 

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Original Poster
I am very happy to see Indy finally looking likes it's going to happen at WDW. It is easily one of WDI's best attractions, and to see Dinosaur use the same track and deliver such a sub-par experience in comparison just isn't right. Hopefully a new version of Indy can be even better than the original and really a stand-out experience.
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
Animal Kingdom isn't only about animals, but there are a lot of animals in South America.

Zootopia isn't about animals. If you think Zootopia is a good fit for Animal Kingdom, you also think Robin Hood is a good fit for Animal Kingdom.

When you don't know what you're talking about, you're better off not talking at all.
Pandora isn't about Animals....No matter how much you squint..
dac84d8a-4488-4220-8306-53ad72cd50b8_text.gif
 

DavidDL

Well-Known Member
… Let’s not pretend Dinosaur needed a deep message about conservation to fit into the park …

Yeah, it didn’t need one because its subject matter helped to fulfill the parks original core vision, which was to be a celebration of animals past, present and imagined. While Dinosaur may not have had a deep rooted message behind it, it still brought attention to the extinct animals of our planet and had a queue that had some light education (being a literal museum).

Indy does feel at home aesthetically, I’ll admit, in DAK. -and the man himself at least has a habit of wanting to preserve relics of the past and history in general so there is that they can work with.

I liked the idea another poster in this thread had of maybe playing up an “Indiana Jones and the Lost World” type of angle. Indy could absolutely end up in a sort of “primeval” area untouched and undiscovered by man on one of his many adventures and it would be a great way to include not just Dinosaurs but lots of extinct species.

Including but not limited to, the Titanoboa, perhaps?


But I won’t get my hopes up or give Disney the benefit of thinking this creatively. It’ll probably just be another Temple of the Forbidden Eye.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom