Thinking about how people will actually use something instead of just making a hidden Mickey in it... that's good design! Solving your problems before you have them; I feel like WDW used to brag about that more in a way I can't quite quantify.
I was flipping through Jeff Kurtti's Since the World Began the other day and there was a little blurb about the purple/black/red road signs and how they went through this whole design process and got this big design firm to help and how they simplified down to the "Epcot Resorts Area" idea and yada yada yada... that's good design. I wonder what would happen today? Disembodied Mickey arm arrows everywhere?
Interesting post because it brings up two points that don't really have much to do with the above, but popped into my head when reading it:
1.) The entire purple, red and white signs were largely the work of John Hench and while some folks loved them, I always found them tacky. They made their debut in 1989 to go with the resort expansion and major additions like Disney-MGM, EPCOT resort area, Typhoon Lagoon, Pleasure Island, final phases of CBR and start of OKW construction.
Personally, I preferred the national park like white on brown signs that WDW had from 1971-1989. Simple. Basic. Classy.
2.) I haven't put this out yet, so take it as VERY informed rumour, but rumour nonetheless. That is that Disney is planning on reclassifying resorts based on location and not value, moderate, deluxe, villa etc. ... So, for instance GF, Poly, Contemp, WL would be MK resorts. CBR, AoA and POP would be WWoS resorts. All Stars and Coronado would be Blizzard Beach/McD's resorts (yes, that IS how they are listed).
No idea what level of thinking this is at. But my gut says that yet again it's a way to raise prices across the board. There are fools out there who already pay $100-150 a night for a basic Disney motel room, I'm sure the thinking may be that Disney can squeeze more revenue out of the resorts by losing terms like 'value' and 'moderate'.