lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
All of those other things exist because of the theme parks. They are secondary to the theme parks. Without the parks they do not exist. Yes, Disney likes people going to these other things, especially if they pay for admission and visit for only a few hours, but they’re a minority of visitors and are still overwhelmingly there in the first place because of the theme parks. Those things are all bonuses on top of the attractions.You're talking about only the theme parks. For many people a WDW vacation extends well beyond that into the water parks, resort amenities, boat rides, shopping at DS. There are a lot of people who love the nighttime entertainment at POR and wouldn't miss it for a few extra rides. Having a drink at TOTWL is also a special experience. Believe it or not, Disney cares about those type of guests too.
Even if we do talk only about the parks, your solution is all standby and adequate capacity to the point that all rides would become walk-ons (because that's the FastPass Lane/Lightning Lane experience that we had). That's not happening in the immediate future so it's no kind of solution for anyone planning a vacation. I'm not crazy about Genie+ but I can work with it.
It's all about personal decisions and experiences when it comes to people actually visiting WDW rather than discussing it in the abstract.
I have never, ever said anything about all attractions being walk-ons. This thought demonstrates the power of perception. None of Disney’s virtual queue systems (FastPass, FastPass+, Boarding Groups or Genie+) have ever offered or even promised walk-ons. Just the way Disney operates by pulsing groups and stacking loading groups makes it incredibly unlikely to just walk on unless the attraction is also a walk on for Stand By. People say they walked on because they do not perceive all sorts of things like waiting at merge, waiting for a pre show to cycle or waiting to load as actual waiting. All sorts of things can impact perception from how switchbacks are laid out in an overflow queue, to having queue scenes, pre shows, how much people can see, and movement.
I don’t know why you arguing bring up vacation planning. I’m not talking about individual vacation planning. I’m talking about the operational decisions that influence guest behavior. Parks can do things that make guests happy and they can do things that annoy guests. They can also do things that distort perception and situations better or worse. Not having enough capacity results in annoyed and stressed guests who feel they are not getting a good value for the time, money and effort put into the visit. Yes, you can say if that happens you just won’t go back, but others visit less frequently and that realization tends to come during a trip. That capacity cannot be easily expanded in the near term does not somehow negate its large influence on the guest experience. Issues are not fixed by pretending they do not exist. There things short term and long term beyond empty threats on a website that Disney can do to positively influence guest behavior.