Disney plus Imagineering

flynnibus

Premium Member
The presentation is nice.. most notably the inclusion of people like Dick Nunis who have been glossed over in prior company stuff.. but the big broad stroke approach is aiming pretty low. I mean, we got more insight out of shows on the Disney Channel 20+ years ago.

I hope later episodes start going deeper and less broad.
 

SuddenStorm

Well-Known Member
meh.. the last thing we needed was another broad history show...

Certainly isn't intended for people who follow this stuff religiously online. But I think the show is great as a casual watch for a more general viewer who is only mildly interested in Disney Parks, and this could help add new fans who want more detailed stuff. It's a great show for a platform like Disney+.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
Certainly isn't intended for people who follow this stuff religiously online. But I think the show is great as a casual watch for a more general viewer who is only mildly interested in Disney Parks, and this could help add new fans who want more detailed stuff. It's a great show for a platform like Disney+.

Exactly, and if it's deemed successful, more Imagineering content will hopefully be made.
 

PiratesMansion

Well-Known Member
I think so far the series is worthwhile, though for me personally it's primarily for the footage. It's also making me realize just how little I really know about how many people were involved in making these places a reality. I thought the second episode did a far more effective job than most pieces of writing at showing how there really was no leadership at the top and the very real effect that had on the parks.

That said, it was definitely weird that Tony Baxter was totally absent from the second episode (with Barry Braverman not only appearing multiple times, but DIRECTLY QUOTING BAXTER). The way it is done comes off as 100% deliberate.

And the second episode continuing to reiterate that the company plainly has no interest in honoring the Magic Kingdom's legacy isn't surprising but is depressing. Despite debuting in Florida, all of the footage for Space Mountain (or at least 90% of it) is from California. The Magic Kingdom apparently only had duplicate rides of what already existed at Disneyland. I'm no fan of the modern day Magic Kingdom or Walt Disney World, but MK deserves some due diligence here for actually trying new things and making a concerted effort to plus everything that existed at Disneyland at that time. Passport2Dreams and other sites have thoroughly convinced me that, as originally constructed, they succeeded brilliantly. That the change has been undone by ineptness and a variety of other factors doesn't mean these improvements never existed or weren't important in the development of Disney's parks. But alas....

Despite the minor rant above, I really do think that this is a great series and I hope it leads to more park-focused media in the future.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
It's also making me realize just how little I really know about how many people were involved in making these places a reality.
In some ways it is a shame that this is looking at the same people who, while definitely important creative leads, does ignore the scale of Disney‘s workforce. Reading a Thea Awards program can be a real eye opener as the required credits list can be amazing in their length.
 

disneyC97

Well-Known Member
I think so far the series is worthwhile, though for me personally it's primarily for the footage. It's also making me realize just how little I really know about how many people were involved in making these places a reality. I thought the second episode did a far more effective job than most pieces of writing at showing how there really was no leadership at the top and the very real effect that had on the parks.

That said, it was definitely weird that Tony Baxter was totally absent from the second episode (with Barry Braverman not only appearing multiple times, but DIRECTLY QUOTING BAXTER). The way it is done comes off as 100% deliberate.

And the second episode continuing to reiterate that the company plainly has no interest in honoring the Magic Kingdom's legacy isn't surprising but is depressing. Despite debuting in Florida, all of the footage for Space Mountain (or at least 90% of it) is from California. The Magic Kingdom apparently only had duplicate rides of what already existed at Disneyland. I'm no fan of the modern day Magic Kingdom or Walt Disney World, but MK deserves some due diligence here for actually trying new things and making a concerted effort to plus everything that existed at Disneyland at that time. Passport2Dreams and other sites have thoroughly convinced me that, as originally constructed, they succeeded brilliantly. That the change has been undone by ineptness and a variety of other factors doesn't mean these improvements never existed or weren't important in the development of Disney's parks. But alas....

Despite the minor rant above, I really do think that this is a great series and I hope it leads to more park-focused media in the future.
Agree 1000%
 

Anjin

Well-Known Member
Been too busy to post, but I enjoyed episode 2. This is definitely a survey course in Imagineering history, but it's really well done. There was a weird balance between The Haunted Mansion up front against WDW in the middle and Tokyo DL at the end. Of course, I would have taken and entire episode on HM.

Looking forward to episode three. Like the others have said, I suspect they are saving Tony Baxter for this one.
 

MK-fan

Well-Known Member
In the first episode, it shows clips from a 1982 conference with the golden age of Disney Imagineers speaking about WED and the history, what was this conference and can I find the video anywhere?
 

smooch

Well-Known Member
Gonna beat a dead horse and say I am almost certain they are talking about Tony Baxter in episode 3. I do agree that this show is great for people that aren't like us, as an entry to behind the scenes shows about the parks. That being said I am very much enjoying watching these episodes, I have seen both episodes twice now. I know most of the stuff they talk about like most people here do, but the footage and the presentation are worth it. I would love it if this show got a good reception and they eventually worked on episodes that deep dive into a specific attraction for each episode.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom