Disney Playing catch up with Universal... Potter Disney's biggest mistake in 20 years...

alissafalco

Well-Known Member
The Nighttime show at AK will be pretty minimal. It will not be anywhere close in quality to World Of Color or Fantasmic. It will be a "nice to have" but definitely not a "must see." The original concept would have been similar to World Of Color and the final version has been reduced to a small-scale Bellagio fountain show with some water projections.
How disappointing!!!
 

space42

Well-Known Member
Pandora will be a great addition. If it was going to universal, it's my personal opinion that people on this board would be praising the new land and saying how groundbreaking the land will be.
This land is a great fit for Animal Kingdom. It's a land that never would have been done without Potter. I think Cameron and his crew will bring us something special.

It will be a great addition if there is truly a groundbreaking, one of a kind, only Disney can build, E-Ticket. Soarin' in 3d??? To me, this has little to do with Avatar and everything to do with the scope of the headliner attraction.
 

CinematicFusion

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Has anything changed in regards to the ideas presented in the storyboards of Avatar: World of Pandora.
It will be a great addition if there is truly a groundbreaking, one of a kind, only Disney can build, E-Ticket. Soarin' in 3d??? To me, this has little to do with Avatar and everything to do with the scope of the headliner attraction.

At some point we just have to wait and see what happens.
From my standpoint, if Cameron signed off on this as the e-ticket attraction, then it's going to be good.
It's his reputation that is on the line.
If the land is terrible, Disney won't be blamed..it will all fall on Cameron. He knows this and he is going to make sure this world is spot on.
He past work shows this, he is a very detailed person.
He will be compared to JK Rowling and be judged by what they did at Universal.
 

Jae99

Well-Known Member
Has anything changed in regards to the ideas presented in the storyboards of Avatar: World of Pandora.


At some point we just have to wait and see what happens.
From my standpoint, if Cameron signed off on this as the e-ticket attraction, then it's going to be good.
It's his reputation that is on the line.
If the land is terrible, Disney won't be blamed..it will all fall on Cameron. He knows this and he is going to make sure this world is spot on.
He past work shows this, he is a very detailed person.
He will be compared to JK Rowling and be judged by what they did at Universal.
I have to agree.
James Cameron doesn't do anything on a small scale when you look at the movies that he has produced. I can't see him doing Avatar Land on a small scale. Cameron has always used or created the newest technologies when making his films.
Lets hope he does the same thing when bringing Avatar to Animal Kingdom.
 

twebber55

Well-Known Member
I agree with you guys...too many people assume that they wont like the land because they didn't like the movie.... if Cameron gave the ok im sure it will be good...how good we ll have to see...Pandora will be compared to WWOHP and Cars Land so we ll see if it stacks up in terms of immersiveness
in terms of merchandise can Disney and Cameron create new/quality items to be sold like universal did?
 

CinematicFusion

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
this whole endeavor sounds like it will be done on the cheap...
AKA:WDW style
How much did the mine train cost? By the looks of it they didn't do it on the cheap. They did shorten it but this is a ride for those at the height of 38 inches. It's a d-ticket ride. It fits fantasyland.

Avatar is going to have an e-ticket and you need to compare Disney's last e tickets for a better comparison of what Disney will do. This is also for a teen-tween market. Very different then the kiddie ride.
Also and don't forget...Cameron's name is attached and he is a detail freak. His reputation is on the line. This is his world...it isn't Disneys. It just happens to be in a Disney park.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Pandora will be a great addition. If it was going to universal, it's my personal opinion that people on this board would be praising the new land and saying how groundbreaking the land will be.
There was plenty of thought that Universal would get the rights and it that speculation came with the same lack of excitement.
 

Disneyhead'71

Well-Known Member
Pandora will be a great addition. If it was going to universal, it's my personal opinion that people on this board would be praising the new land and saying how groundbreaking the land will be.
This land is a great fit for Animal Kingdom. It's a land that never would have been done without Potter. I think Cameron and his crew will bring us something special.
Universal passed on Avatar.
 

kucarachi

Active Member
Avatar doesn't have much merchandising potential. Which makes Disney's bid for Avatar even more perplexing.

Also, it wasn't a good movie.
Good movie or not it is the highest grossing movie in the world for all time...so there are people that want to see the product. I personally am not a fan of naked blue people (Sorry smurfette)
 

CinematicFusion

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
There was plenty of thought that Universal would get the rights and it that speculation came with the same lack of excitement.
Well...we will just have to see what happens.
I feel people are going to be surprised at this land.
I also feel if this wasn't call Avatar...people would be freaking out about this new world at Animal Kingdom. It fits perfect with the concept of this park and brings in the fantasy creatures we have all dreamed would inhabit this park when beastly kingdom was on the table. This themed area of Animal Kingdom is going to rock.
We as fans of theme parks are in for a treat. Avatar Land, Harry Potter, future Star Wars. Who cares who builds what...it's getting built. How fun is that! Theme parks are becoming just like movies studios. They are just funding other peoples imaginative ideas. Rowling, Lucas, Cameron.
Would you not see a blockbuster movie if it was distributed by someone else besides Disney or Universal?
Movie going patron: "Wow...that movie looks amazing! Who distributed it? Oh...Sony did. To heck with that, I'm not going."

I think those people who aren't excited about this land lack vision.
Movie was average, I agree. The world created was amazing. Again...if this land wasn't called Avatar...Disney fans would be freaking out of what was coming to Animal Kingdom based on these visuals.

Besides, who is to say the next movies aren't amazing. Cameron has spent a lot of time on them. Maybe...just maybe...this becomes a huge movie franchise and an amazing world to explore. Time will tell...

James Cameron's name is on the line. It's his reputation that will be damaged if this land isn't up to his standards...it will be!
3679949_orig.png


disney-avatar-land.jpg



http://www./wp-content/uploads/2013/10/avatar.jpg

avatar-concept-1.jpg


disney-avatar5_verge_super_wide.jpeg


gwgb.jpg
 

CinematicFusion

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Universal passed on Avatar.
Then it was their mistake...
Univesal doesn't have Animal Kingdom, this fits perfect at this park. I'm glad Universal passed.
Maybe Universal didn't want to spend the money...they were to cheap. :)

Besides it wasn't Cameron who was pitching the idea....Disney called him, not the other way around.
 
Last edited:

NoChesterHester

Well-Known Member
Well...we will just have to see what happens.
I feel people are going to be surprised at this land.
I also feel if this wasn't call Avatar...people would be freaking out about this new world at Animal Kingdom. It fits perfect with the concept of this park and brings in the fantasy creatures we have all dreamed would inhabit this park when beastly kingdom was on the table. This themed area of Animal Kingdom is going to rock.
We as fans of theme parks are in for a treat. Avatar Land, Harry Potter, future Star Wars. Who cares who builds what...it's getting built. How fun is that! Theme parks are becoming just like movies studios. They are just funding other peoples imaginative ideas. Rowling, Lucas, Cameron.
Would you not see a blockbuster movie if it was distributed by someone else besides Disney or Universal?
Movie going patron: "Wow...that movie looks amazing! Who distributed it? Oh...Sony did. To heck with that, I'm not going."

I think those people who aren't excited about this land lack vision.
Movie was average, I agree. The world created was amazing. Again...if this land wasn't called Avatar...Disney fans would be freaking out of what was coming to Animal Kingdom based on these visuals.

Besides, who is to say the next movies aren't amazing. Cameron has spent a lot of time on them. Maybe...just maybe...this becomes a huge movie franchise and an amazing world to explore. Time will tell...

James Cameron's name is on the line. It's his reputation that will be damaged if this land isn't up to his standards...it will be!
3679949_orig.png


disney-avatar-land.jpg



http://www./wp-content/uploads/2013/10/avatar.jpg

avatar-concept-1.jpg


disney-avatar5_verge_super_wide.jpeg


gwgb.jpg

That concept art is incredible. I keep seeing it said on here that Cameron's people did the art work not WDI.
 

CinematicFusion

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
That concept art is incredible. I keep seeing it said on here that Cameron's people did the art work not WDI.

I'm telling you. This is Cameron's baby. He will not let it be some half arsed could have been/should have been concept.
It is either up to his standards...or it isn't made.
That doesn't mean there isn't a budget...everything has a budget. But...Cameron has been known to go over budget on other peoples money.
 

DinoInstitute

Well-Known Member
New Fantasyland is especially annoying when you think about what could have been. 7DMT could have actually been the E Ticket we needed. Instead it's budget and track length were cut until we have what's there today.View attachment 57666 Thanks to marni for this pic, the dark sections represent indoor show scenes.
Was there any ever concept art or just info given on what would have gone into the extra dark ride scenes?
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
It will be a great addition if there is truly a groundbreaking, one of a kind, only Disney can build, E-Ticket. Soarin' in 3d???.
That wouldn't cut it.

A 3-4 or even 5 minute Soarin' style ride as the anchor? It'd be a good support act to the main attraction if there was one.

This land needs a true E ticket. 10-15 minutes of proper WDI storytelling. Ride system to die for. Physical space to move through. Pirates of the Caribbean in Pandoraland. Worth queuing an hour for. RSR or Mystic scale. Re ridability. Not Soarin 2.0.

It is in danger of being another FLE. Beautiful to look at but mediocre substance.

The park needs and deserves more.
 
Last edited:

CinematicFusion

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
That wouldn't cut it.

A 3-4 or even 5 minute Soarin' style ride as the anchor? It'd be a good support act to the main attraction if there was one.

This land needs a true E ticket. 10-15 minutes of proper WDI storytelling. Ride system to die for. Physical space to move through. Pirates of the Caribbean in Pandoraland. Worth queuing an hour for. Re ridability. Not Soarin 2.0.

The park need and deserves more.

Marni...described what you know about the rides in Pandora. What will it be like to ride Soarin 2.0. What does the ride vehicle look like? How are we transported into the world?
The boat ride... How do they make it come to life, how long is it. Does it go inside and outside?
Sounds like you have seen the concept first hand and are disappointed in what James Cameron has approved of.
Whatever you saw, you feel the park deserves more. What is it you saw? What is it you didn't like?
 

AndyMagic

Well-Known Member
There is no doubt in my mind that Pandora will be gorgeous and immersive. I think the main worry about the expansion is the headliner attraction. I know Cameron is almost as protective as Rowling when it comes to quality control but since his main passion is film technology he had no trouble signing off on Soarin 2.0 since it is a chance for him to showcase and produce more filmed sequences. Rowling helped make sure The Wizarding World of Harry Potter was built with almost unprecedented attention to detail but it was Universal Creative that was wholly responsible for Forbidden Journey with only minor tweaks provided by Warner and Rowling. In other words, Cameron might have the ability to maintain quality control but he can't make Disney do what they used to do and innovate by creating a truly groundbreaking main attraction.
 

Mike S

Well-Known Member
Was there any ever concept art or just info given on what would have gone into the extra dark ride scenes?
I don't know about concept art for the extra dark ride scenes but I know I've seen concept art of an outdoor scene where you passed under a bridge as the Dwarfs march across but I can't seem to find it. Maybe @marni1971 can help me with this?
 

imagineer boy

Well-Known Member
I don't think Disney missing out on the franchise is the thing to bemoan here. The fact that Universal has given Disney an a$$ whooping in terms of WWoHP's sheer quality and innovation is what really did it. Disney's idea of "innovation" these days is simply cramming pre-existing marketable characters into tired old attractions. No technological or artistic breakthroughs what so ever.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom