Eric Graham
Well-Known Member
I believe that DC Baker posted an article on here from Deadline that it is happening.Is the Figment movie still happening?
I believe that DC Baker posted an article on here from Deadline that it is happening.Is the Figment movie still happening?
Actually it will never make sense to build a traditional “fifth gate” in Orlando. It’s not a matter of time, age or “saturation”…it’s society.Once their current parks are saturated, it would make sense to build a new park at each resort years from now. I've never said this thing is starting tomorrow. That's especially true for WDW, but it applies to Disneyland as well. It's post-current-wave-of-expansions.
Aren’t you supposed to talk to water, Neptune?Isn't LA always heavily concerned with water shortages though? I'm sure a water park is logistically feasible, but I think might not play well from a PR perspective.
Isn't LA always heavily concerned with water
Remember the pre-recession "Boutique WDW Park" rumors? Good times, good times.Actually it will never make sense to build a traditional “fifth gate” in Orlando. It’s not a matter of time, age or “saturation”…it’s society.
Two important concepts:
1. Park Cannibalism
2. The “Seven Day Wall”
You know where they know this?
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRckIehhdIMFjffthNfiKR9vIJfSPimfD91nNHM9bGxGw&s
It’s not economically viable
Yeah…those kicked around for decadesRemember the pre-recession "Boutique WDW Park" rumors? Good times, good times.
Discovery Cove is pretty awesome...what's wrong with Discovery Cove?Yeah…those kicked around for decades
Two words: discovery cove
If anything…now that they’ve kinda abandoned water parks…that’s what you’d see
We’ve scene hints of it over time. Notably the backstage safaris at DAK
and…of course…the galactic dumpster.
Which was a disaster on multiple planes.
Discovery Cove is awesome.Discovery Cove is pretty awesome...what's wrong with Discovery Cove?
Discovery Cove is pretty awesome...what's wrong with Discovery Cove?
Discovery Cove is what made ole Mike REALLY want a boutique…but his time (which was my time) had ended.Discovery Cove is awesome.
Disney has yet to find the map or motivation to adapt and scale the boutique model to work for them.
Starcruiser is as close as they've gotten, and we know how that went.Discovery Cove is what made ole Mike REALLY want a boutique…but his time (which was my time) had ended.
For some reason - they’ve never been able to really commit to a concept.
I mean - the parks function/profit off mass consumption - that is a fact…so they never probalcy wanted to take on overhead for something that could not be run that way…
But it’s not something they couldn’t succeed with if they are intelligent about it.
But this management is NOT intelligent about Orlando. It’s why they are stuck with a competitor gaining ground
An Inside Out 4D show is a no-brainer for the Imagination theater. They could even split the costs with DLR and DLPInside Out and Figment should both have a larger presence at WDW in the coming years.
You mean a Partial, budget based commitment to a flawed idea…misreading the IP and market and an embarrassing price point?Starcruiser is as close as they've gotten, and we know how that went.
One and the same.You mean a Partial, budget based commitment to a flawed idea…misreading the IP and market and an embarrassing price point?
I feel they had a choice betweenYou mean a Partial, budget based commitment to a flawed idea…misreading the IP and market and an embarrassing price point?
The original trilogy would not have saved it. The market for a locked-down faux cruise of mono-themed dinner theater and/or LARPing while the world’s premier theme parks sit inaccessible mere yards away is (shocker!) just not that big.I feel they had a choice between
1) Luxury priced SW original trilogy experience
2) More modestly priced SW new trilogy experience
And somehow they took the two more limiting aspects of both and went with that.
inaccessible is dramatic, you spent majority of the second day (of the 2 night experience) at DHSThe original trilogy would not have saved it. The market for a locked-down faux cruise of mono-themed dinner theater and/or LARPing while the world’s premier theme parks sit inaccessible mere yards away is (shocker!) just not that big.
Perhaps I’m somewhat biased against DHS, but for the higher-than-normal price, it doesn’t feel like an effective use of my time in Disney World. I’m not saying there’s not a subset of the population that really enjoys it, just that I think the format is a bigger hurdle for most people than the precise subject matter. There wouldn’t suddenly be significantly more people flocking to it for the OT.inaccessible is dramatic, you spent majority of the second day (of the 2 night experience) at DHS
I understand what you’re saying, but this is also a portion of the issue, people who say “but the parks” have a serious misunderstanding of the experience. It wasn’t a hotel. It was a 46 hour “cruise”.Perhaps I’m somewhat biased against DHS, but for the higher-than-normal price, it doesn’t feel like an effective use of my time in Disney World. I’m not saying there’s not a subset of the population that really enjoys it, just that I think the format is a bigger hurdle for most people than the precise subject matter. There wouldn’t suddenly be significantly more people flocking to it for the OT.
I said faux cruise in my first post. I get it. I just think it’s an idea that didn’t resonate with the general public and, right or wrong, raises questions of “why would I go to Disney World to do that?” because of where it is physically situated.I understand what you’re saying, but this is also a portion of the issue, people who say “but the parks” have a serious misunderstanding of the experience. It wasn’t a hotel. It was a 46 hour “cruise”.
I understand, and apologize that I missed that in your original post. Either way, it's closed and I don't think Disney will replicate it.I said faux cruise in my first post. I get it. I just think it’s an idea that didn’t resonate with the general public and, right or wrong, raises questions of “why would I go to Disney World to do that?” because of where it is physically situated.
I feel they had a choice between
1) Luxury priced SW original trilogy experience
2) More modestly priced SW new trilogy experience
And somehow they took the two more limiting aspects of both and went with that.
It wouldn’t have saved it based on what they builtThe original trilogy would not have saved it. The market for a locked-down faux cruise of mono-themed dinner theater and/or LARPing while the world’s premier theme parks sit inaccessible mere yards away is (shocker!) just not that big.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.