I'm a retired officer, but that's a whole other deal. I have read that in some places, enlisted folks make so little as to eligible for food stamps. Yes, I think they should make more for the risks they can incur, but there is combat or hazard pay to offset that somewhat.I really don't think we should be forcing young enlisted folks to pick between serving their country and starting a family. This attitude about what 'wages are intended' to support seems really problematic to me. In the rest of the economy, wages are set by the market and employees ability to leave and negotiate wages.
Enlisted folks don't have those options. They should be paid at least the living wage as a matter of principle. From what you've shared, that seems to largely be the case, so maybe what is needed are family allowances and child credits rather than 'wage increases'.
I googled "enlisted pay" and an E-1 (lowest enlisted rank-private/airman basic) with greater than 4 months' service makes 1,785 in basic pay.
Then I googled BAH Basic Allowance for Housing, what you get if the base can't provide housing on base. If you have dependents, you get more in the military. Bigger quarters on base or more BAH off base. Very foreign (and against the law) to what we're talking about in this thread.
�
2021 Basic Allowance For Housing In LOS ANGELES, CA | |
---|---|
With Dependents$36,072.00 per year $3,006.00 per month | Without Dependents$27,072.00 per year $2,256.00 per month |
Many military wives end up working. They try to make places for them at the BX, etc.. There is generally a large childcare facility on base. This helps some of them survive until they make a more living wage after a few promotions. Of course, free medical care makes up some value to somewhat offset the low pay.
Heppenheimer made great points that I didn't see til was half done.
Last edited: