News Disney mask policy at Walt Disney World theme parks

Status
Not open for further replies.

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
That's what I'm saying. The people that matter the most to those kids' development are not wearing masks around them.
New people who enter a child's life matter a lot in their development.
Friends, teachers... These are key encounters in a young persons life.
We didn't evolve to just see eyes outside the home.
 

correcaminos

Well-Known Member
There is no achievable condition, even in theory, in which immunocompromised individuals will not be at risk in a theme park environment. That's what it MEANS to be immunocompromised.

The point is not "I don't care," the point is "that's literally impossible."
And the unvaccinated? I was talking generic spread from kids hence immunocompromised. But those are two groups who are at risk from kids.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
My school district just handed out KN95s but they were mass produced in China and fit very poorly. Open your mouth and they are off your nose. Try teaching like that.

Completely useless.
KN95 is the Chinese equivalent of N95, so they're all made in China anyway. Not sure how helpful this is for kids, since they generally need smaller masks, but one way of determining if a KN95 mask is up to scratch or not is to see if the manufacturer received FDA emergency authorisation back when true N95s were difficult to come by.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
We're talking about CHILDREN.

You're right. COVID isn't the flu. It's much LESS LIKELY to put strain on the healthcare system than COVID in CHILDREN.

Why do you people refuse to acknowledge that the risk profile of this virus is vastly different for different age groups? Masking children for COVID is like treating teenage boys for menstrual cramps.
Sure, making sure Little Timmy doesn't get sick and infect and potentially kill his mother is totally stupid, because Little Timmy "will be *fine"


*Little Timmy may, in fact, develop long-term complications from a novel virus that negatively impact his health down the road, and there's simply no way of knowing that yet.


Why do YOU refuse to acknowledge that letting children spread the virus (even if many children have few immediate symptoms) is a bad idea for everybody, including them?
 

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
Sure, making sure Little Timmy doesn't get sick and infect and potentially kill his mother is totally stupid, because Little Timmy "will be *fine"


*Little Timmy may, in fact, develop long-term complications from a novel virus that negatively impact his health down the road, and there's simply no way of knowing that yet.


Why do YOU refuse to acknowledge that letting children spread the virus (even if many children have few immediate symptoms) is a bad idea for everybody, including them?
Timmy's mother has been vaccinated with Pfizer-Pfizer-Moderna and her risk is basically zero too.

And yes, "basically zero," or "practically zero," or "effectively zero" is as good as it's going to get. Risk will never be eliminated entirely.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Timmy's mother has been vaccinated with Pfizer-Pfizer-Moderna and her risk is basically zero too.

And yes, "basically zero," or "practically zero," or "effectively zero" is as good as it's going to get. Risk will never be eliminated entirely.
It literally isn't "basically" or "practically" or "effectively" zero, though, and won't be for as long as we continue to let the virus spread amongst unprotected people (including children) where it can form new variants that the Vaccines don't protect against.

Your point isn't nearly as solid as you think it is and people are dead because of that line of thinking.
 

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
It literally isn't "basically" or "practically" or "effectively" zero, though, and won't be for as long as we continue to let the virus spread amongst unprotected people (including children) where it can form new variants that the Vaccines don't protect against.

Your point isn't nearly as solid as you think it is and people are dead because of that line of thinking.
fdbf3d94e18263bf3eb1a585803f8e2f.jpg


Preventing infection is not humanity's telos.
 

Trauma

Well-Known Member
It literally isn't "basically" or "practically" or "effectively" zero, though, and won't be for as long as we continue to let the virus spread amongst unprotected people (including children) where it can form new variants that the Vaccines don't protect against.

Your point isn't nearly as solid as you think it is and people are dead because of that line of thinking.
Spread is going to continue among people forever.

Covid 0 is not going to happen. That’s what the scientists are saying.

So what’s your point again?
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
You think this ends?

Yes, even if we did nothing it would end, we’d just have a higher death toll before it happened.

Had it not mutated to Delta it probably would have ended 6 months ago, thankfully Omicron happened and cut Deltas death toll short… Omicron has a very good chance of ending this with how infectious it is and it’s antibodies being effective against the other strains, as long as it doesn’t mutate into something that evades omicron antibodies it’s likely over in another month or two.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Spread is going to continue among people forever.

Covid 0 is not going to happen. That’s what the scientists are saying.

So what’s your point again?
The point is that suddenly ditching mitigation efforts, even for "the sake of the kidz", is idiotic and will put more children in harms way than it will remove from it. Some directly from developing illness, and others indirectly from people around them falling ill.

You're the one who brough up Covid 0, not me. I agree that it's important to learn to live with the virus, but that means engaging in long-term strategy, not throwing caution to the wind.
 

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
The point is that suddenly ditching mitigation efforts, even for "the sake of the kidz", is idiotic and will put more children in harms way than it will remove from it. Some directly from developing illness, and others indirectly from people around them falling ill.
Did you advocate for masking children during flu season prior to March 2020? If not, why not?

 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
People need to relax. Children are not being psychologically or socially damaged from having to wear a mask. Children have no problem wearing a mask. Some people need to stop inventing problems to complain about.

By the way, if the people so worried about children wearing masks had worn masks themselves from the beginning then those children wouldn't have to wear a mask now. See how that works?

Some people just like to complain.
Karen Intensifies GIF by MOODMAN
It is the narrative that some are gullible enough to believe and or push.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom