Prince Thomas
Well-Known Member
EPCOT without characters would be boring!!!! Snoozefest!!!! What time is it???? 1980s? Nope it's 2015.....I swear y'all must be old
But it's so cute!!!Does no one care about the god awful ride in Mexico?? That offends me more then this Frozen attraction.
Or, perhaps some just don't need to see characters at every turn. Not sure what declaring everyone to be "old" has to do with anything though....EPCOT without characters would be boring!!!! Snoozefest!!!! What time is it???? 1980s? Nope it's 2015.....I swear y'all must be old
Can't recall anyone here saying they "wanna be" back anywhere. Just that they'd prefer EP not be overwhelmed with characters or character-based attractions....Old people = wanna be back in 1982!....isn't there a back to the future ride at universal? I don't think they have tons of characters walking around every corner there
EPCOT without characters would be boring!!!! Snoozefest!!!! What time is it???? 1980s? Nope it's 2015.....I swear y'all must be old
EPCOT without characters would be boring!!!! Snoozefest!!!! What time is it???? 1980s? Nope it's 2015.....I swear y'all must be old
But it's so cute!!!
I think one of the animatronics escaped from Maelstrom.Old people = wanna be back in 1982!....isn't there a back to the future ride at universal? I don't think they have tons of characters walking around every corner there
Do not engage the troll.Can't recall anyone here saying they "wanna be" back anywhere. Just that they'd prefer EP not be overwhelmed with characters or character-based attractions....
Not really sure what DHS has to do with this discussion....
At least DHS is about entertainment and movies so Frozen does fit better there than it does in Epcot. If Disneys plan was to demo animation courtyard and use some of the Backlot land near there as well as some land behind Sunset Blvd. for a real Frozen land you wouldn't see me complaining at all. To me I think DHS would work great with the same model USF is going with right now: great new rides/lands based on well known and successful IP. Hollywood and Sunset Blvd. would remain to keep that old Hollywood feel and from there you would walk into the worlds of the movies (Star Wars, Pixar, Frozen, etc.)Another park where Frozen is not a thematic fit...
EPCOT without characters would be boring!!!! Snoozefest!!!!
Plenty visited EP before the character infusion. Plenty still visit without participating in character interactions. And that included families as well....Agreed. I wouldn't go to Epcot if not for the characters, personally. And I think a lot of families with kids feel the same way. Adding characters helps get families into the park. Otherwise, Epcot would probably be the least visited of the four. And with the addition of Frozen? They are going to see massive ticket sales at Epcot. Yes, thematically, Frozen would be better at MK. But this is a good business decision as far as getting people to visit Epcot.
While I think avatar land could work if done right how has disney dropped the ball so long with no lion king attraction or even land at the animal kingdom? Build it with pride rock and people would FLIP.
At least DHS is about entertainment and movies so Frozen does fit better there than it does in Epcot. If Disneys plan was to demo animation courtyard and use some of the Backlot land near there as well as some land behind Sunset Blvd. for a real Frozen land you wouldn't see me complaining at all. To me I think DHS would work great with the same model USF is going with right now: great new rides/lands based on well known and successful IP. Hollywood and Sunset Blvd. would remain to keep that old Hollywood feel and from there you would walk into the worlds of the movies (Star Wars, Pixar, Frozen, etc.)
That says a lot about the parenting skills of those families.Agreed. I wouldn't go to Epcot if not for the characters, personally. And I think a lot of families with kids feel the same way.
I think the constantly booked restaurants and the very long lines at Soarin and Test Track would disagree with you. Also, Disneys large demographic of first time visitors have no idea what is in the parks. They just know Epcot has the 'big golf ball'. Characters are much cheaper than adding quality attractions so Disney pacifies guests with them and in return the guests defend the cheapness simply for a lack of not knowing any better.Adding characters helps get families into the park. Otherwise, Epcot would probably be the least visited of the four
"Scientist discovers lost civilization and scores hot chick" goes back a LOT further than Stargate.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.