Difference between a partnership/investment with OLC and doing it on their own. I do think that if they were building the Tokyo and DL Pooh attractions at the same time, they would have built both of them (space permitting) the same way to achieve a cost savings.
They were made at a similar time actually. MK Pooh opened in 1999. Tokyo opened in 2000.
To be fair. there are plenty around here calling anybody who thinks this overlay is anything other than an abomination an idiot. So we're even on that front.
Was referring to DL vs WDW but in any case, let's just call em cheap.
Which is sad. Bummer that people can't love it or hate it without being jerkholes to each other.
Fair enough lol. You did say "Tokyo and DL" in that post though. I assumed you meant MK and not DL.
Agreed!
That would be amazing ! After riding Antartica a few times, I couldn't help but wonder - is a system like that actually less costly, in the long run, than an onmimover or boat-in-canal type ride? If, as I assume, any malfunctioning vehicle can be simply swapped out with one offstage, does that make things easier operationally ? Not that I'm saying that should be the first consideration (gawd forbid) bit I'd be interested on seeing what Disney can do with that ride system.
I'm certain it was the abundance of W and the lack of enough F that got everyone so rowdy
So happy they at least weren't destroyed.
That's exactly what I was wondering too
Same here, knew they had to at least keep the 3-headed troll. My favorite part
