I also wanted to add that Knotts within 3 weeks of their closure, announced that all their pasholders got another year in addition to 2020.
Meanwhile Disneyland gave little to no information on what they were doing. People who held onto their passes were promised an extension and instead almost a year later the whole program was cancelled.
They also haven't even properly managed the refunds despite sitting on people's money (in a high yield bank account) since March.
Now my problem is besides the Chicken Restaraunt and the Log Ride, I don't really care for Knotts Berry Farm. But I can acknowledge that they seem to actually care about their customers and have it together more than Disneyland.
When Cedar Fair and Six Flags are setting an example for Disney, you know there's an issue. 10 years ago I could never imagine it being this way.
But around 20 years ago....
Re: DCA: AN interesting look back at the last 4+ years
Somebody was kind enough to send me an internal PointPoint presentation file from over 5 years ago. I totally trust this person in the fact that this is the real Mc Coy, and not a fake. If I could share my source, I am sure you would agree that it is a true document.
Sorry, guys I will not post the file, nor will I share it. I am sorry, but you are going to have to trust me on this one. I will clearly identify my comments with brackets [like this]. I am also only going to post selected information, mainly related to the infamous comment, and other points discussed over the last few years.
I received a 10 slide presentation, based on the wording, is an internal WDI presentation.
The first slide is the title slide...
THE "OFF THE SHELF" DECISION
Slide 2 is titled "1995 Company Mentality", which had 7 points.
Point 2 is "Can we do a "E" attraction for $70M?"
Point 6 is "With Paul Pressler's arrival our client became the "parks", not MDE."
Slide 3 is
1996 KEY TO A CHEAPER PARK
Facility, Show or Ride - Pick any 2.
Capitalize on an improving ride industry.
Take known technology & theme it with paint color, lighting & graphics.
Take advantage of engineering already spent by others.
"Direct Lifts"
If it's good enough for Six Flags ....
The "Guiding Principles"
As to the second point of Capitalizing, [To me, this is looking at outside companies, such as S&S Power, since the outside vendors have been making better products in the last decade or so]
And the fifth point, "Direct Lifts" [and as described in a later slide, this is taking attractions from other Disney parks, such as Muppets 3-D (the example they used)]
Slides 4 and 5 talks about the Guiding Principles.
The 4th slide is titled "How can Disney's California be realized for less than traditional practice?"
Then we have 11 points for the sub-category "Park Planning/Design/Theming" (the next slide has the other sub-category).
Point 1 is "No berm around the park", other points mention outside visual intrusions are OK, themed facades are faux, show-like, not immersions or period reproductions, that only the entries and front facades are to be themed, and to keep the Monorail as is.
Slide 5 contains 5 "Backstage Philosophy" points, including "First cost before life cycle savings"
Slide 6 is titled "Embracing the Industry... Their way"
5 points, my favorite is "We don't have any lawyers & we don't want to get any."
Slide 7 is titled "Our Experience", with the category of "good" and 11 points
Slide 8 is the category "Lessons Learned" and 6 points.
Slide 9 is just a title slide, "Would we do it again?" and nothing else.
Slide 10 starts with "Yes" in large letters, and then the sentence "The pros far out weigh the cons. But..."
Then we have 5 points, my favorite on this page is, "Have attractions partners sign(underlined) in advance of the buy." [I read this as get the prospective sponsor to pay up before spending the money, or at least be guaranteed that they will pay for it]
[OK, this is the end of the PowerPoint presentation. So what have we learned, that the statement "If it's good enough for Six Flags..." was actually made at a meeting inside the Disney company, and not made up, as some folks wanted us to believe! That Disney had serious cost control issues while designing and building DCA. That Disney made the decision to use "Off the Shelf" rides instead of designing and building their own. That Disney is looking to keep the costs down on new "E" attractions (the $70 million comment, and now the LA Times report of DCA's ToT costing $75 million). That Disney purposely cut back on the theming at DCA.]