Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
All the popular CGI 'animated' movies with talking animals have human-expressing faces. E.g. the latest Puss 'n Boots which got critical acclaim and did well at the Box Office.

For some reason, when Disney does this, it's criticized.

For some reason.
This is a bit silly. I’m right there with you in the so-called Pixie Duster camp and I hate the style they’ve used for Mufasa. Without good evidence, you really shouldn’t accuse people of being disingenuous or agenda-driven just because they express opinions you happen to disagree with.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
What happens if it does not hit a billion?

I mean, technically nothing. The company is bragging about it regardless. It would be a pretty steep drop off to not follow through considering it hit 600 in 10 days.

It probably takes the gas slightly off Moana 3; but that would require horrendous uptake on D+ I think for them to cancel that at this juncture.

I think it’s the live action film that seems more of a poor choice. That likely would never have been approved had they always intended to do a Moana sequel theatrically.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
What happens if it does not hit a billion?

I make myself a dry martini with a twist, toast myself, and say "Not bad for an old guy who hates math..." 🍸 🧐

I mean, technically nothing.

Agreed. Moana 2 already broke even as of this past week. I think we should probably pull those current profit numbers together on Monday or Tuesday once this weekend's numbers come in globally.

I just don't see the momentum for it to get to a Billion on its current trajectory. I could be very wrong, and families will flock back to see it from December 26th to January 5th globally, and it will get there. But my gut tells me that won't happen.

Quite frankly, I'm more worried about the box office prospects for Mufasa. My Pop Culture Radar (Popdar?) after a Target run in town recently left me feeling there's not much cultural buzz for that one. And I'm sure Mufasa cost Burbank much more than the modest $150 Million Made For TV budget that Moana 2 conveniently had.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
I make myself a dry martini with a twist, toast myself, and say "Not bad for an old guy who hates math..." 🍸 🧐



Agreed. Moana 2 already broke even as of this past week. I think we should probably pull those current profit numbers together on Monday or Tuesday once this weekend's numbers come in globally.

I just don't see the momentum for it to get to a Billion on its current trajectory. I could be very wrong, and families will flock back to see it from December 26th to January 5th globally, and it will get there. But my gut tells me that won't happen.

Quite frankly, I'm more worried about the box office prospects for Mufasa. My Pop Culture Radar (Popdar?) after a Target run in town recently left me feeling there's not much cultural buzz for that one. And I'm sure Mufasa cost Burbank much more than the modest $150 Million Made For TV budget that Moana 2 conveniently had.

I don’t disagree with anything except to say the families showing up over Christmas is expected with how these WDAS films typically do. You’ve only really had the pleasure of experiencing two busts out of the gate and weren’t around for all these films last decades.

So more so I’m siding on if the families don’t show that’s actually the more unexpected and disappointing outcome for them. It would infer the film had even worse word of mouth than the CinemaScore would have figured. Particularly since the movie opened so high, that’s really bad legs. The average legs of these holiday films are typically higher than summer (often 5-6X) not that Moana has that potential anymore.

Ps I’m also terribly dubious on Mufasa.
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Almost all CGI offends me in some way. The notable exception is a background, whether it be a cityscape, a forest, etc. Old movies used to just have a painted backdrop. This is really no different.

Otherwise, I find it lazy and subpar. I also find other new tech similarly subpar. Telephone calls were much more reliable on a landline. Streaming services are nowhere near as convenient as a cable TV package. The old Soarin’ didn’t have bent images.

With all that said, you either accept the premise and style of a movie at the beginning or you don’t. If you don’t, you probably shouldn’t see it. You also probably shouldn’t complain about it. You should go about your day and stop fricking whining.

There are pros and cons to hand drawn animation, anime style, computerized animation, stop motion animation, and CGI.

Personally, I prefer the warmth of hand drawn. When I was a kid, I wanted to be a cartoonist.

I also very much enjoy all the Rankin/Bass stop Motion holiday specials. Some people can’t stand them because they don’t like the style.

I have never appreciated the anime style. I have never appreciated the computerized animation style where faces are all oddly squared off, etc.

The Lion King has never held a place of great significance for me. I have seen it once. It was fine. I like it. That’s about it.

I find myself curious about this whole backstory idea. I’d like to see how they fill in the blanks. I’ve seen the previews, and yes, it’s CGI. Therefore I have no expectation of the animation being good. All CGI that you can tell is CGI is bad - just like all plastic surgery you can tell is plastic surgery is bad.

Going into it knowing that, but also knowing I’d like to see the story unfold, means I’m going to see the film, and it’s unlikely I will notice the CGI issues as much after the first 20 minutes. It’s also unlikely I will put it at the top of my list of complaints if I don’t like the movie. It would have to be utterly unwatchable for me to say that, because I’m already expecting it to be irksome. My expectations are realistic.

If my schedule allows, I’d like to see it in a theater. My review would likely be based mostly on the story itself, not if some little CGI detail is off.

I find the complaining about it as bothersome as the CGI itself. Many movies look stupid with CGI, that’s life now. This film would be no better or worse than the others for it. Judge the story.
 
Last edited:

Minnesota disney fan

Well-Known Member
For my 2 cents (and that's what it is worth, lol), I thought the animals in Mufasa in the trailers looked "off", just all wrong for some reason I can't put my finger on. I kept looking at them and wondering what is wrong? They just dont' look "right" to me.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
I think CGI is more of a “look” test than anything. There’s high quality CGI that looks ”off” and bad quality CGI that “works”, and there’s movies like Black Panther that have mostly amazing CGI while also having a CGI car scene that looked horrible. I think the live action Lion King falls into that category also, I loved the animation style but occasionally something would look “off”, overall I really enjoyed it though.

If something looks “right” our brains typically accept it, if it looks “off” our brains typically question it.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Looks like Moana 2 was able to stay #1 with a drop below 50% with $26.6M (48%).

We should probably just round that up to $27 Million. But even then, that's a tad weaker than I had thought it would do this weekend, it's last weekend unopposed by Mufasa or any hedgehogs. On Friday, I said...

Assuming the trend remains the same, at least domestically, it looks like Moana 2 won't break $30 Million this weekend (Friday to Sunday, 12/13-15). Perhaps $28 Million domestically this weekend?

The same trendlines of 50%-ish box office dropoffs week over week are holding overseas too, and that would seem to show that overseas is heading towards a final tally by early January of around $450 Million or so.

Now that it's already broken even, tomorrow or Tuesday when final weekend tallies are in from overseas and the USA, we can do an update on the profit that Moana 2 has already pulled in on its slow late December march towards.... $900 Million globally?

Maybe More Time On The Eliptical Bike Would Help.jpg


 

DisneyWarrior27

Active Member
We should probably just round that up to $27 Million. But even then, that's a tad weaker than I had thought it would do this weekend, it's last weekend unopposed by Mufasa or any hedgehogs. On Friday, I said...



The same trendlines of 50%-ish box office dropoffs week over week are holding overseas too, and that would seem to show that overseas is heading towards a final tally by early January of around $450 Million or so.

Now that it's already broken even, tomorrow or Tuesday when final weekend tallies are in from overseas and the USA, we can do an update on the profit that Moana 2 has already pulled in on its slow late December march towards.... $900 Million globally?

View attachment 830584

Dude, it’ll do more than $450M OS with people around the world off for the holidays starting this weekend.

I’m telling you it’s going to hit a billion worldwide before Dog Man (the next actual animated film for families) comes out.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
For my 2 cents (and that's what it is worth, lol), I thought the animals in Mufasa in the trailers looked "off", just all wrong for some reason I can't put my finger on. I kept looking at them and wondering what is wrong? They just dont' look "right" to me.

I saw my first commercial on YouTube for Mufasa this morning. I agree, it looked off to me. The commercial focused on a warthog, but a few other animals were there too. It all looked just sort of.... weird. And the commercial wasn't very funny. 🤔
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Dude, it’ll do more than $450M OS with people around the world off for the holidays starting this weekend.

I’m telling you it’s going to hit a billion worldwide before Dog Man (the next actual animated film for families) comes out.

Well, maybe it would help Moana 2 in a perverse way if Mufasa bombs? Then you'd only have one Disney family movie in theaters worth paying attention to?

What's the buzz on Sonic The Hedgehog? I didn't see any merchandise or displays at Target for that the other night. Is the Sonic movie highly anticipated by families with young children? Or is it more of a teenage boy movie for the video game crowd?
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
The CGI in The Lion King does not bother me the way it does in other movies… I think it is because the whole movie is CGI… so it feels like another art form to me… what takes me out of a movie is when CGI interacts with live action characters…. It always looks fake to me

I am in the minority here as I really liked The Lion King remake…the original is my favorite Disney movie of all time… as such I am really looking forward to Mufasa… it will expand on The Lion King story and it seams they have some talent inbolved
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom