Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
I don't need to. I watched the film and her age is never mentioned, nor was it ever mentioned by anyone who worked on the film.

Her supposedly being 14 was a myth perpetuated online to tear down the character even further. There are so many pop culture articles out there claiming she's 14 without any evidence or credible sources.
The 14 and 18 ages come from Disney themselves via the art of Disney books, I agree with you though that unless you went out of your way to Google it you’d never know their supposed ages, I always thought mid to late teens and 18-20 based on looks, had I not Googled it I’d continue to think there’s a 3-4 year age gap, nothing nefarious in that.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
The 14 and 18 ages come from Disney themselves via the art of Disney books, I agree with you though that unless you went out of your way to Google it you’d never know their supposed ages, I always thought mid to late teens and 18-20 based on looks, had I not Googled it I’d continue to think there’s a 3-4 year age gap, nothing nefarious in that.
Unfortunately by many modern standards it is considered nefarious at this point with that large of an age gap. So it does give the ick if you think about it for even half a second.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Just out of curiosity, what in the actual film shows him presented as emancipated?
Given that he is a Prince from a neighboring kingdom alone on lands not of his own indicates he is at least of adult age in the eyes of his kingdom, ie emancipated. Not to mention that most kingdoms of the time wouldn't have allowed the heir to a thrown to be alone without at least one guard, so there is that too.
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
I don't need to. I watched the film and her age is never mentioned, nor was it ever mentioned by anyone who worked on the film.

Her supposedly being 14 was a myth perpetuated online to tear down the character even further. There are so many pop culture articles out there claiming she's 14 without any evidence or credible sources.

Then don’t ask the question.

The point was supposed to have been a softball question to @Vegas Disney Fan to establish that some things obviously should be updated when updating a film nearly a century old. This is routine in doing remakes. So why would you recreate a princess who is completely subservient to and at the whim of every man in the world - in 2025?
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
Then don’t ask the question.

The point was supposed to have been a softball question to @Vegas Disney Fan to establish that some things obviously should be updated when updating a film nearly a century old. This is routine in doing remakes. So why would you recreate a princess who is completely subservient to and at the whim of every man in the world - in 2025?
Exactly… I think some are missing the point…. It’s not about if it worked in the film back then…. It’s would it work for todays audience
 

Farerb

Well-Known Member
In that case I hope some character explicitly mentions her age is 21 or older in the remake otherwise it's going to be extremely problematic. If they don't mention her age, people will just assume she's 14 like in the original.
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
In that case I hope some character explicitly mentions her age is 21 or older in the remake otherwise it's going to be extremely problematic. If they don't mention her age, people will just assume she's 14 like in the original.
Maybe the story will start on her 21st birthday.
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
In that case I hope some character explicitly mentions her age is 21 or older in the remake otherwise it's going to be extremely problematic. If they don't mention her age, people will just assume she's 14 like in the original.
There could always be references to things like school, peers, or many other things that would get the point across - for both characters.
 

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
The box office Reddit sickos seem to think Capt. A4 will make less than The Eternals when it’s all said and done. If that happens I think the narrative may shift from “decent but unexceptional” to something like “the attached garage is on fire.”
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
The box office Reddit sickos seem to think Capt. A4 will make less than The Eternals when it’s all said and done. If that happens I think the narrative may shift from “decent but unexceptional” to something like “the attached garage is on fire.”
By this weekend it should either match or surpass what Eternals did domestically during its entire run, ie its already ahead of where Eternals was at this point. So the only thing would be if international falls off the cliff, which I don't see happening. So while I won't say its impossible, I'll say its not likely for that to happen.

At the very least I see it making the same as Eternals, if not surpassing it, based on where things are at this point.
 

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
Then don’t ask the question.

The point was supposed to have been a softball question to @Vegas Disney Fan to establish that some things obviously should be updated when updating a film nearly a century old. This is routine in doing remakes. So why would you recreate a princess who is completely subservient to and at the whim of every man in the world - in 2025?
That was never my takeaway from Snow White. I think it's interesting how different people can watch the same movie and have totally different interpretations of it. And now all this conversation has me itching to watch Snow White again. Sorry, Chi84! 😂
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom