Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

[CinematicFusion]

Disney absolutely deserves contempt, condemnation, and economic pushback for its cowardly capitulation.

Multiple levels of the US government explicitly attacking a corporations right to free speech, employing legislative and legal action to punish and threaten that corporation because it was saying things the government didn’t like, IS new. I cannot think of a historical precedent in American history. And it’s a really big deal.

Here is the other side of the coin:

Disney’s opposition to Florida’s Parental Rights in Education Act, which restricts classroom discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity for children 9 and under, began with public statements that fall under free speech. However, the company went further than expressing an opinion by pausing political donations, advocating for the law’s repeal, and leveraging its significant cultural and economic influence. These actions moved Disney from a neutral business entity to an active participant in a political and cultural conflict. This step into corporate activism may help explain why Florida’s government responded with more than criticism, using legislative action to revoke Disney’s unique self-governance privileges.

The situation is less about Florida attacking Disney “out of the blue” and more about a clash of ideologies. Disney took a political stance by opposing a bill that its proponents framed as protecting young children, and Florida responded by leveraging its governmental authority to counter Disney’s influence. This escalation highlights the unique and controversial nature of the conflict.

From one perspective, Disney exercised its free speech rights; from another, it engaged in political activism and faced political consequences for doing so.

 

[Casper Gutman]

Here is the other side of the coin:

Disney’s opposition to Florida’s Parental Rights in Education Act, which restricts classroom discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity for children 9 and under, began with public statements that fall under free speech. However, the company went further than expressing an opinion by pausing political donations, advocating for the law’s repeal, and leveraging its significant cultural and economic influence. These actions moved Disney from a neutral business entity to an active participant in a political and cultural conflict. This step into corporate activism may help explain why Florida’s government responded with more than criticism, using legislative action to revoke Disney’s unique self-governance privileges.

The situation is less about Florida attacking Disney “out of the blue” and more about a clash of ideologies. Disney took a political stance by opposing a bill that its proponents framed as protecting young children, and Florida responded by leveraging its governmental authority to counter Disney’s influence. This escalation highlights the unique and controversial nature of the conflict.

From one perspective, Disney exercised its free speech rights; from another, it engaged in political activism and faced political consequences for doing so.

I’m sorry, but this isn’t another perspective or side of the coin, it’s a fundamental, unambiguous misunderstanding of foundational American freedoms. Disney pausing political donations and advocating against a law were completely within its free speech rights - they changed absolutely nothing. The government taking action against you because you don’t give them voluntary donations or advocate for changes to laws is as clearly, unambiguously unconstitutional as anything the government can do. I simply cannot stress enough how much it violates the most basic principles of the US.

 

[TalkingHead]

Frozen II, Inside Out II, and Moana II would like to have a word with you...

Keep going: Mufasa, Furiosa, Joker, The Marvels

 

[DKampy]

Keep going: Mufasa, Furiosa, Joker, The Marvels

All of this is cherry picking…. You can find diminishing returns as well as the opposite at any given point in film history.. as we could. Also include Deadpool and Aliens as film franchises that improved it’s grosses over the last this past year

 

[TalkingHead]

All of this is cherry picking…. You can find diminishing returns as well as the opposite at any given point in film history.. as we could. Also include Deadpool and Aliens as film franchises that improved it’s grosses over the last this past year

Obviously there are exceptions like Deadpool, which benefited from several novelty factors (first MCU entry, Wolverine, R-rating, only Marvel release of the year, etc)

But Alien is exactly the kind diminishing return I’m talking about. It was a surprise hit *by today’s standards* and it did about the same as Covenant when adjusted for inflation.

But it made much less worldwide ($350M) than Prometheus ($400M) unadjusted for inflation. It would be closer to $550M for Prometheus in 2024 dollars. It’s also in the horror genre which has remained resilient post-Covid.

But the Alien is franchise isn’t what it was even in the early 2010s.

 

[DKampy]

Obviously there are exceptions like Deadpool, which benefited from several novelty factors (first MCU entry, Wolverine, R-rating, only Marvel release of the year, etc)

That may be the wrong lesson that is learned…. An R rating does not make a film successful…. Just look at Kraven

But Alien is exactly the kind diminishing return I’m talking about. It was a surprise hit *by today’s standards* and it did about the same as Covenant when adjusted for inflation.

But it made much less worldwide ($350M) than Prometheus ($400M) unadjusted for inflation. It would be closer to $550M for Prometheus in 2024 dollars. It’s also in the horror genre which has remained resilient post-Covid.

But the Alien is franchise isn’t what it was even in the early 2010s.

I agree it was not where it was before Covenant…. That film did a lot of damage to the brand….but I think Romulus. Did turn the franchise around for many….even if I am in the minority and did not care for it…. Every franchise is only one good film away from turning it around

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

…down the well here

 

[Dranth]

From one perspective, Disney exercised its free speech rights; from another, it engaged in political activism and faced political consequences for doing so.

This is the problem, there should be no state sponsored political consequences.

It always amazes me how short sighted we are as a spices. People continually mistake now for the future so don't think about how normalizing this kind of action is going to allow it to be turned back on them in the future.

 

[Vegas Disney Fan]

I’m sorry, but this isn’t another perspective or side of the coin, it’s a fundamental, unambiguous misunderstanding of foundational American freedoms. Disney pausing political donations and advocating against a law were completely within its free speech rights - they changed absolutely nothing. The government taking action against you because you don’t give them voluntary donations or advocate for changes to laws is as clearly, unambiguously unconstitutional as anything the government can do. I simply cannot stress enough how much it violates the most basic principles of the US.

More often than not we’re on opposite sides of an argument but I think we’ll always see eye to eye on this one. I thought it was a dumb business decision for Disney to get involved in a highly politicized issue but they had every right to do so, the only retaliation they should have had to worry about was their customers closing their wallets, not the government punishing them.

 

[Disney Analyst]

Can we please not get the box office thread closed…

Luiz see’s Moana 2 hitting 1-1.1 billion.



“
#Moana2 approaches 500M overseas, & 900M mark at Global #BoxOffice despite #Mufasa & #Sonic!

Overseas, #Moana2 grossed STRONG 36.1M on 5th weekend, going actually up +3.7% from last weekend, despite all competition, for a 487.9M intl. cume over 53 markets.

Allied to its 394.6M cume in the US, the #Moana sequel hits a 882.5M Global cume.

900M+ next week already!

Eyeing a 1B-1.1B Global run”

 

[DisneyWarrior27]

Can we please not get the box office thread closed…

Luiz see’s Moana 2 hitting 1-1.1 billion.



“
#Moana2 approaches 500M overseas, & 900M mark at Global #BoxOffice despite #Mufasa & #Sonic!

Overseas, #Moana2 grossed STRONG 36.1M on 5th weekend, going actually up +3.7% from last weekend, despite all competition, for a 487.9M intl. cume over 53 markets.

Allied to its 394.6M cume in the US, the #Moana sequel hits a 882.5M Global cume.

900M+ next week already!

Eyeing a 1B-1.1B Global run”

It’ll probably hit $900M tomorrow on New Year’s Eve and hit $1B WW by Martin Luther King Jr. Day Weekend.

The question is will that win be enough to persuade Disney to turn Tiana’s Paperman-style animated Disney+ series into a fully 2D/hand-drawn animated theatrical film sequel to The Princess and the Frog for a wide Thanksgiving 2029 release?

We’ll just have to wait and see.

I mean they’re doing it with turning Season 4 of The Mandalorian into The Mandalorian & Grogu: A Star Wars Story, turning Marvel Studios’ Armor Wars from a Disney+ series into a movie, and giving Bluey a movie.

So they can’t put a genie back in the bottle when they’re doing things like this.

 

[Disstevefan1]

Everyone knew even though Moana 2 was cobbled together from a D+ series, the movie would be a blockbuster!

I call out Disney when the do stupid things, and I will call out when the do super smart things. This was smart!

 

[Disney Analyst]

So, coming into 2024… did anyone have this on their Bingo card, and if so… what are the winning lottery numbers for next week?

 

[Disstevefan1]

So, coming into 2024… did anyone have this on their Bingo card, and if so… what are the winning lottery numbers for next week?

I thought this would do OK at the box office, but after seeing it I was sure, but did not expect 1.6M - WOW!

Disney please create a big beautiful Inside Out omnimover dark ride in the WoL pavilion in EPCOT... After all, you already fixed the roof!!

 

[LSLS]

So, coming into 2024… did anyone have this on their Bingo card, and if so… what are the winning lottery numbers for next week?

Honestly, I bet more than you think.

 

[CinematicFusion]

I’m sorry, but this isn’t another perspective or side of the coin, it’s a fundamental, unambiguous misunderstanding of foundational American freedoms. Disney pausing political donations and advocating against a law were completely within its free speech rights - they changed absolutely nothing. The government taking action against you because you don’t give them voluntary donations or advocate for changes to laws is as clearly, unambiguously unconstitutional as anything the government can do. I simply cannot stress enough how much it violates the most basic principles of the US.

I agree

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

So, coming into 2024… did anyone have this on their Bingo card, and if so… what are the winning lottery numbers for next week?

Based on a really weak slate? It’s not that far fetched

Honestly, I bet more than you think.

I think you’re right

But the only reason it was so was because it was a fantastic movie…not just a canned sequel a la frozen 2

 

[LSLS]

Based on a really weak slate? It’s not that far fetched

I think you’re right

But the only reason it was so was because it was a fantastic movie…not just a canned sequel a la frozen 2

The first was also popular, and if I remember, there were not a lot of other things released competing against it. A lot going for it (like you said, on top of it being very well done).

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

The first was also popular, and if I remember, there were not a lot of other things released competing against it. A lot going for it (like you said, on top of it being very well done).

In the end…other than perhaps the fast and the furious …the quality is what has been mostly winning out at the box office.

If people get the feelz…that’s how the blockbuster is made.

Those that don’t do it…fail

Even if a certain studios failures get glossed over here as part of a 12 step program

 

[Mr. Sullivan]

Not the same… Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was created for an adult audience, explicitly designed to challenge societal norms and foster meaningful dialogue on racial equality. Comparing it to the recent removal of a transgender storyline from a children’s show like Win or Lose ignores the vastly different audience and purpose.

Disney’s decision was not about removing LGBTQ representation. The company has stood firmly behind inclusivity, as evidenced by Strange World, which features an openly gay lead character—unchanged and fully intact on Disney+.

However, Disney has chosen to respect parental preferences, acknowledging that many families prefer to address complex topics, such as gender identity, on their own timeline.

What’s happening now is not unprecedented nor antithetical to the country’s ideals. It’s a nuanced approach to representation that balances inclusivity with the developmental needs of young audiences. Representation remains a priority, but context and audience matter just as much.

Edit: I said a lot more but I don’t wanna get this thread closed too.

So let me say only this: you can rationalize this all you want, but it’s wrong of them to do.

Queer people have a right to be mad about it. I know there’s many people out there who’ve never had to learn what it feels like to have your very existence and identity challenged and debated, but let me tell you it’s dehumanizing and deeply infuriating.

Especially so when it’s being enabled by an entity that has meant a lot to you your whole life.