Disney Irish
Premium Member
ALF's story (whose real name is Gordon Shumway by the way) is almost exactly like Superman's and would be a refugee since Melmac was destroyed by war.Just so I know, what subset of immigrants is ALF?
![]()
ALF's story (whose real name is Gordon Shumway by the way) is almost exactly like Superman's and would be a refugee since Melmac was destroyed by war.Just so I know, what subset of immigrants is ALF?
![]()
That will soon change when Lilo & Stitch hits that billion.There have been zero billion dollar movies in 2025 not approved by the central committee…in reality
Thanks, Captain O. I think there’s was universal agreement on that around here alreadyThat will soon change when Lilo & Stitch hits that billion.
The very definition of striving for mediocrity.Elio passed $100M after Tuesday.
View attachment 869968
![]()
Elio (2025) - Box Office and Financial Information
Financial analysis of Elio (2025) including production budget, domestic and international box office gross, DVD and Blu-ray sales reports.the-numbers.com
Which is a shame, because it’s a better movie than a good chunk of the movies currently raking it in. It’s just not a safe IP sequel reboot audiences turn out for and has the added issue of being animated sci-fiThe very definition of striving for mediocrity.
That is only .7x its budget.
I didn't think it was very good compared to previous Pixar offerings. Its on the bottom fifth to me.Which is a shame, because it’s a better movie than a good chunk of the movies currently raking it in. It’s just not a safe IP sequel reboot audiences turn out for and has the added issue of being animated sci-fi
I was comparing it to the movies currently in theaters not previous Pixar entries. Also Wall*E is one of the few exceptionsI didn't think it was very good compared to previous Pixar offerings. Its on the bottom fifth to me.
Wall*E was animated sci-fi and it did just fine.
We hear a lot of that latelyWhich is a shame, because it’s a better movie than a good chunk of the movies currently raking it in. It’s just not a safe IP sequel reboot audiences turn out for and has the added issue of being animated sci-fi
Anything is possible professor, but if that was the case then Inside Out 2 wouldn't have soared to ~$1.7B.We hear a lot of that lately
It couldn’t be…gasp…the BRAND that isn’t appealing, could it?
How to Train Your Dragon and F1 were great.I was comparing it to the movies currently in theaters not previous Pixar entries. Also Wall*E is one of the few exceptions
I didn’t care for HTTYD because it was just HTTYD with actual people, other than the score being better it was just a ho-hum shot for shot remake. Certainly entertaining but not greatHow to Train Your Dragon and F1 were great.
However it's kind of a pointless statement because most movies currently in theaters are mediocre at best.
Next year we’ll probably see Hoppers flop, and if Toy Story still has juice in itAnything is possible professor, but if that was the case then Inside Out 2 wouldn't have soared to ~$1.7B.
So unappealing brand issue I doubt is the problem.
Maybe we'll see.Next year we’ll probably see Hoppers flop, and if Toy Story still has juice in it
I think it’s a half truthAnything is possible professor, but if that was the case then Inside Out 2 wouldn't have soared to ~$1.7B.
So unappealing brand issue I doubt is the problem.
We hear a lot from you and some of the other people here that it's not the norm for big successful movies, the industry is shifting... Well I'd say inside out 2 isn't the norm. Just because one film killed it doesn't erase the brand erosion that's happened. Pixar was a must see theater event no matter what. That's just not the case anymore. Sure streaming hasn't helped but Disney and it's quality have been the biggest culprit in my opinion.Anything is possible professor, but if that was the case then Inside Out 2 wouldn't have soared to ~$1.7B.
So unappealing brand issue I doubt is the problem.
Got it… so what is working… live action remakes and sequels…. Prepare for much more of that…. Sounds like the branding is not the issue…. as people are seeing recognizable brandsI think it’s a half truth
Inside out 2 had a ton of heart…and the brand rec…
Stitch - flaws aside - has a ton of heart especially for the last 30 minutes.
That’s the formula
What doesn’t seem to be working is “brand alone”. Like what had once worked for things such as the live actions and lesser quality Pixar flicks.
As always…things vary/change…but we can comment on trendlines
So the "formula" is "known" properties? Because it can't just be about "heart". Because by all reports (including my own personal viewing) Elio has heart too, just like the other two.I think it’s a half truth
Inside out 2 had a ton of heart…and the brand rec…
Stitch - flaws aside - has a ton of heart especially for the last 30 minutes.
That’s the formula
What doesn’t seem to be working is “brand alone”. Like what had once worked for things such as the live actions and lesser quality Pixar flicks.
As always…things vary/change…but we can comment on trendlines
I don't deny that some trust was lost in the "brand" due to some otherwise bad moves such as pushing some direct to streaming. But that doesn't explain why after all the positive reviews why some wouldn't just go and see it which would have built momentum. So that indicates to me that people are still more willing to wait to try an "unknown" property at home rather than risk seeing it at the cost of a ticket.We hear a lot from you and some of the other people here that it's not the norm for big successful movies, the industry is shifting... Well I'd say inside out 2 isn't the norm. Just because one film killed it doesn't erase the brand erosion that's happened. Pixar was a must see theater event no matter what. That's just not the case anymore. Sure streaming hasn't helped but Disney and it's quality have been the biggest culprit in my opinion.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.