• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Just so I know, what subset of immigrants is ALF?

alf_2.jpg
ALF's story (whose real name is Gordon Shumway by the way) is almost exactly like Superman's and would be a refugee since Melmac was destroyed by war.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
Which is a shame, because it’s a better movie than a good chunk of the movies currently raking it in. It’s just not a safe IP sequel reboot audiences turn out for and has the added issue of being animated sci-fi
I didn't think it was very good compared to previous Pixar offerings. Its on the bottom fifth to me.
Wall*E was animated sci-fi and it did just fine.
 

Nevermore525

Well-Known Member
How to Train Your Dragon and F1 were great.
However it's kind of a pointless statement because most movies currently in theaters are mediocre at best.
I didn’t care for HTTYD because it was just HTTYD with actual people, other than the score being better it was just a ho-hum shot for shot remake. Certainly entertaining but not great

Lilo and Stitch mostly shot for shot decent but not great.

Haven’t caught F1 yet.

Jurassic Rebirth is two movies in one with no clue which way it wants to go and is messy, but hey cool dinosaurs!!

Same can be said for 28 Years Later being two movies in one which takes it down a peg for storytelling.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Anything is possible professor, but if that was the case then Inside Out 2 wouldn't have soared to ~$1.7B.

So unappealing brand issue I doubt is the problem.
I think it’s a half truth

Inside out 2 had a ton of heart…and the brand rec…

Stitch - flaws aside - has a ton of heart especially for the last 30 minutes.

That’s the formula

What doesn’t seem to be working is “brand alone”. Like what had once worked for things such as the live actions and lesser quality Pixar flicks.

As always…things vary/change…but we can comment on trendlines
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Anything is possible professor, but if that was the case then Inside Out 2 wouldn't have soared to ~$1.7B.

So unappealing brand issue I doubt is the problem.
We hear a lot from you and some of the other people here that it's not the norm for big successful movies, the industry is shifting... Well I'd say inside out 2 isn't the norm. Just because one film killed it doesn't erase the brand erosion that's happened. Pixar was a must see theater event no matter what. That's just not the case anymore. Sure streaming hasn't helped but Disney and it's quality have been the biggest culprit in my opinion.
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
I think it’s a half truth

Inside out 2 had a ton of heart…and the brand rec…

Stitch - flaws aside - has a ton of heart especially for the last 30 minutes.

That’s the formula

What doesn’t seem to be working is “brand alone”. Like what had once worked for things such as the live actions and lesser quality Pixar flicks.

As always…things vary/change…but we can comment on trendlines
Got it… so what is working… live action remakes and sequels…. Prepare for much more of that…. Sounds like the branding is not the issue…. as people are seeing recognizable brands
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I think it’s a half truth

Inside out 2 had a ton of heart…and the brand rec…

Stitch - flaws aside - has a ton of heart especially for the last 30 minutes.

That’s the formula

What doesn’t seem to be working is “brand alone”. Like what had once worked for things such as the live actions and lesser quality Pixar flicks.

As always…things vary/change…but we can comment on trendlines
So the "formula" is "known" properties? Because it can't just be about "heart". Because by all reports (including my own personal viewing) Elio has heart too, just like the other two.

I think what can be said is that consumers are not immediately going to go to an unknown property no matter the "brand".
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
We hear a lot from you and some of the other people here that it's not the norm for big successful movies, the industry is shifting... Well I'd say inside out 2 isn't the norm. Just because one film killed it doesn't erase the brand erosion that's happened. Pixar was a must see theater event no matter what. That's just not the case anymore. Sure streaming hasn't helped but Disney and it's quality have been the biggest culprit in my opinion.
I don't deny that some trust was lost in the "brand" due to some otherwise bad moves such as pushing some direct to streaming. But that doesn't explain why after all the positive reviews why some wouldn't just go and see it which would have built momentum. So that indicates to me that people are still more willing to wait to try an "unknown" property at home rather than risk seeing it at the cost of a ticket.

So again this get back to the debate on what impact streaming has on the overall box office.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom