BrianLo
Well-Known Member
The Fox purchase from Disney's perspective was always about content. There is value in sky, but 95% of it is the market access and distribution. There is very minimal content in Sky relative to the price. Unlike Star.
I think ultimately both companies got what they want. Comcast is still a distribution company, Disney is doubling down on content instead. There is certain stability in Sky comparatively, which is why its so valuable. Personally the way the industry is heading though I think Disney is looking the right way. The NBC-U purchase for Comcast provided them more long term stability than I think the Sky purchase did.
Apart from Comcast forcing up the price on the way too reasonable deal Disney was getting, in the end Disney has shed itself of a quite a lot of things in the package deal it only sort of wanted and is left with what Iger was really strategically after.
I think ultimately both companies got what they want. Comcast is still a distribution company, Disney is doubling down on content instead. There is certain stability in Sky comparatively, which is why its so valuable. Personally the way the industry is heading though I think Disney is looking the right way. The NBC-U purchase for Comcast provided them more long term stability than I think the Sky purchase did.
Apart from Comcast forcing up the price on the way too reasonable deal Disney was getting, in the end Disney has shed itself of a quite a lot of things in the package deal it only sort of wanted and is left with what Iger was really strategically after.