mikejs78
Well-Known Member
Let's set aside our disagreement about the current state of Star Wars. For SW to have long term legs as a franchise, it *needs* films that only gross in the ~$200M domestic range. Look at the MCU - it has Black Panther/Avengers and it has Ant Man and the Wasp. All three are considered successful, yet AMatW will make less than Solo.I gotcha...
But here’s where I’m at: they had a Star Wars gross $213 domestically in 2018.
Even George couldn’t pull that off...and his “blue period” was downright awful.
At least Picard is back.
The problem is that Ant Man was made to be a fairly low budget film and as a filler movie while Solo was not, and everyone expects all SW films to be huge record breaking blockbusters. That expectation has to go. SW needs a good balance of event films along with smaller films that can take more risks and tell different kinds of stories. Solo did about what I think a non-event SW film should be expected to do. Now Disney just needs to come to the realization that that's what the smaller films will do and budget accordingly. Had Solo cost ~$150M to make, Solo would have been a smashing success. They'll still have their $600M+ blockbusters - but it just won't be every single filler film.