JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
They knew 14 quid per share was the rate on 7/13Maybe Disney were waiting to see what they would be required to pay then before making a bid so they can offer the minimum
They knew 14 quid per share was the rate on 7/13Maybe Disney were waiting to see what they would be required to pay then before making a bid so they can offer the minimum
How long does Disney-Fox really have to make another offer if 8/22 is the Comcast deadline? Do we think they would push it to 8/17? Otherwise, next week could be interesting?
Under UK takeover law they have 28 days from the date Comcast submitted their bid to make a counter bid. That gives them until the end of this Wednesday.
The 22nd applies to Comcast only and that is their deadline to put it to Sky shareholders to vote on. They are probably waiting to see if Fox's deadline elapses without action before doing anything themselves.
Thanks. That is helpful. With Disney earnings on Tuesday, and the deadline Wednesday. Next week could be busy.
Thanks. That is helpful. With Disney earnings on Tuesday, and the deadline Wednesday. Next week could be busy.
That is if they do elect to continue bidding of course. The earnings call on Tuesday may provide information on that either way.
I thought Fox wasn't going to bid themselves again? Maybe they are.
I'm thinking by being forced to sell off the regional sports and getting money back there, they may make a bid.
Personally I dont think 23 million is that exceptional when I think Hulu is hovering just under that for just a US based streaming service
Disney and everyone else wanted BP to break 700 million. Did Disney do something to ensure it would? I think they probably did! So what. There are so many groups they could have worked with but it's strange nothing has come out. On the other hand maybe see another group did it. $50,000 is only 10,000 tickets at $5.00 each. 2 shows a day for 3 days is just 15 theaters is just 111.11 a show. If people cared enough it's easy to see it make it even without a push by Disney.Well the Deadline article says 'expected' so they could be wrong
Have you accidentally posted in the wrong thread here haha?Disney and everyone else wanted BP to break 700 million. Did Disney do something to ensure it would? I think they probably did! So what. There are so many groups they could have worked with but it's strange nothing has come out. On the other hand maybe see another group did it. $50,000 is only 10,000 tickets at $5.00 each. 2 shows a day for 3 days is just 15 theaters is just 111.11 a show. If people cared enough it's easy to see it make it even without a push by Disney.
Disney and everyone else wanted BP to break 700 million. Did Disney do something to ensure it would? I think they probably did! So what. There are so many groups they could have worked with but it's strange nothing has come out. On the other hand maybe see another group did it. $50,000 is only 10,000 tickets at $5.00 each. 2 shows a day for 3 days is just 15 theaters is just 111.11 a show. If people cared enough it's easy to see it make it even without a push by Disney.
There was a big article about this topic a couple of weeks ago, essentially Disney has been goosing these grosses to pass thresholds of 'success' by using dollar theatres and drive-ins and working closely with those speciality houses to keep the movies playing by letting them do interesting double features. I don't think there is anything wrong with it, they are making good business decisions and likely getting movies to back-end participation levels as well. (the best examples are pushing Solo over $200M and A Wrinkle in Time to $100M)
They didn't have to push to get Solo over $200M. Currently Solo sits at $213M domestic.There was a big article about this topic a couple of weeks ago, essentially Disney has been goosing these grosses to pass thresholds of 'success' by using dollar theatres and drive-ins and working closely with those speciality houses to keep the movies playing by letting them do interesting double features. I don't think there is anything wrong with it, they are making good business decisions and likely getting movies to back-end participation levels as well. (the best examples are pushing Solo over $200M and A Wrinkle in Time to $100M)
They didn't have to push to get Solo over $200M. Currently Solo sits at $213M domestic.
They didn't have to push to get Solo over $200M. Currently Solo sits at $213M domestic.
I know it’s only $13M, but when a film stops making money, it can take MONTHS just to earn $1 Million. It took nearly two month for Black Panther to go from $699,000,000 to $700MWow...that’s a huge difference...
That’s less that rian Johnson and Kathy Kennedy spend on sushi when they have one of their “working lunches”
I know it’s only $13M, but when a film stops making money, it can take MONTHS just to earn $1 Million. It took nearly two month for Black Panther to go from $699,000,000 to $700M
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.