• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

News Disney and Fox come to terms -- announcement soon; huge IP acquisition

plutofan15

Well-Known Member
The next generation of Wireless Technology... Supposedly the new technology less latency with more throughput, connection density, spectrum efficiency, traffic capacity, and network efficiency—within the next couple of years.

That is what I thought. But Comcast does not own or operate any cellular networks; the service they bundle and sell is a MVNO from Verizon. There will be no expense to Comcast from upgrading to the 5G technology, all expense will be on Verizon.
 

bartholomr4

Well-Known Member
That is what I thought. But Comcast does not own or operate any cellular networks; the service they bundle and sell is a MVNO from Verizon. There will be no expense to Comcast from upgrading to the 5G technology, all expense will be on Verizon.


I'm not an expert on 5G (or much of anything for that matter), but what I read about 5G is the potential for people to select wireless internet instead of wire-lined internet (via fiber/cable). Comcast is the biggest in wire-lined and will need to defend its wire if the 5G promise shows up. They also could convert from wire to wireless and expand into new markets..... That's the speculation anyway..... If the 5G technology is disruptive, Comcast will end up spending capital to defend its base.... That was my point, and why a big debt load could get in the way of their bread and butter.
 

Next Big Thing

Well-Known Member
T : D W - Thor 2 : The Dark World
Yes, technically AM&tW won't be the least successful MCU sequel, but when you weigh in inflation, it will be by a pretty decent amount. Not that it matters as the film is in the green now and still hasn't opened in some markets like Japan and a few others.

I do think that the chances of an Ant-Man 3 are pretty slim though considering his arc is likely going to be fulfilled in Avengers 4. Plus Ant-Man 2 hasn't done as well worldwide as Ant-Man did. Even though I enjoy the films, if i'm Marvel, i'm probably pushing Ant-Man and Wasp into Hawkeye and Black Widow roles where they appear in other films, but are mainly supporting.

Especially with X-Men in play for Phase 4.
 

plutofan15

Well-Known Member
I'm not an expert on 5G (or much of anything for that matter), but what I read about 5G is the potential for people to select wireless internet instead of wire-lined internet (via fiber/cable). Comcast is the biggest in wire-lined and will need to defend its wire if the 5G promise shows up. They also could convert from wire to wireless and expand into new markets..... That's the speculation anyway..... If the 5G technology is disruptive, Comcast will end up spending capital to defend its base.... That was my point, and why a big debt load could get in the way of their bread and butter.

Gotcha. So you are saying that Comcast's expense would be in upgrading their coax based internet service to compete with 5G cellular service. Could be some expense there but I do not expect Comcast to get back into the cellular wireless business - far too expensive to build out a network. I was laid off in May after nearly 26 years in cellular engineering and actually worked for Comcast when they owned a cellular network in the Philly area. But they sold that off in 1999 to SBC which then eventually became Cingular and now AT&T. I am sure that 5G technology will take some customers away from coax based internet, I currently have my home internet service provided through cellular and I am getting 20 Mbps on 4G LTE. Granted, I am in a rather rural area with relatively few users. Rollout of 5G technology is in its infant stage now and will take some time before it is available everywhere.
 

Next Big Thing

Well-Known Member
AntMan2 is running 30% higher in the same worldwide markets than AntMan1.
I still think Ant-Man's story culminates with Avengers 4... no need for Ant-Man 3. Maybe if they didn't get X-Men they could've milked it, but now there's no need to.

Or maybe they wait 3-4 years and do a team up in Ant Man 3, much like they did with Cap 3 and Thor 3, which drove up box office returns.
 

AnotherDayAnotherDollar

Well-Known Member
Yes, technically AM&tW won't be the least successful MCU sequel, but when you weigh in inflation, it will be by a pretty decent amount. Not that it matters as the film is in the green now and still hasn't opened in some markets like Japan and a few others.

I do think that the chances of an Ant-Man 3 are pretty slim though considering his arc is likely going to be fulfilled in Avengers 4. Plus Ant-Man 2 hasn't done as well worldwide as Ant-Man did. Even though I enjoy the films, if i'm Marvel, i'm probably pushing Ant-Man and Wasp into Hawkeye and Black Widow roles where they appear in other films, but are mainly supporting.

Especially with X-Men in play for Phase 4.

Black Widow is getting her own movie according to very reliable sources.

Inflation adjusted BO means not usually a good comparison. AM 2 will end up about 20-25% over Ant Man 1 domestic and WW. It's good growth for the IP and on a smaller budget.

I still think Ant-Man's story culminates with Avengers 4... no need for Ant-Man 3. Maybe if they didn't get X-Men they could've milked it, but now there's no need to.

Or maybe they wait 3-4 years and do a team up in Ant Man 3, much like they did with Cap 3 and Thor 3, which drove up box office returns.

I feel fairly certain Feige is smart enough to still bring us new properties besides the established X-Men. I feel fairly confident Eternals is still going to happen regardless.
 

Next Big Thing

Well-Known Member
Black Widow is getting her own movie according to very reliable sources.
I know Black Widow is getting her own movie, but for about 8 years now, she's just been a supporting character. I think Ant-Man could easily transition into that role. Or a role like Scarlett Witch may be more comparable given her abilities and Ant Man/Wasp's. Black Widow is more of a spy/martial artist.
 

Rodan75

Well-Known Member
I know Black Widow is getting her own movie, but for about 8 years now, she's just been a supporting character. I think Ant-Man could easily transition into that role. Or a role like Scarlett Witch may be more comparable given her abilities and Ant Man/Wasp's. Black Widow is more of a spy/martial artist.

Random aside- I totally think that BW is going to premier on DisneyFlix. It will be there first $75-$100M movie.
 

AnotherDayAnotherDollar

Well-Known Member
Random aside- I totally think that BW is going to premier on DisneyFlix. It will be there first $75-$100M movie.

That would be great, though I'm not sure they will do that. They are moving to 4 theatrical releases per year after the Fox acquisition IMO. And then when you add the TV shows that seems like there's no room for more content.
 

mikejs78

Well-Known Member
Random aside- I totally think that BW is going to premier on DisneyFlix. It will be there first $75-$100M movie.
Marvel Studios and Marvel TV are two separate divisions after Feige lobbied to get out from reporting to Ike Perlmutter. There would be too much of a turf war for that to ever happen.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Or maybe they wait 3-4 years and do a team up in Ant Man 3, much like they did with Cap 3 and Thor 3, which drove up box office returns.
I've said it before, after a Superheroes first solo movie, all the others should be a team up with an established character. People, myself included, want to see these heroes interact with each other. And besides, its a bit unrealistic that they aren't hanging around each other anyway.
 

Next Big Thing

Well-Known Member
Random aside- I totally think that BW is going to premier on DisneyFlix. It will be there first $75-$100M movie.
I actually think Black Widow would've worked better as a series seeing as she starts out as a Russian Spy before defecting, etc, but she's too interwoven into the MCU at this point, ScarJo would cost too much for a TV series and her character has been through too much. It would need to be an origin story to work.
 

Next Big Thing

Well-Known Member
I've said it before, after a Superheroes first solo movie, all the others should be a team up with an established character. People, myself included, want to see these heroes interact with each other. And besides, its a bit unrealistic that they aren't hanging around each other anyway.
The thing is, they based Cap 3 off Civil War and Thor 3 off Planet Hulk. Is there a comic book story arc that would make sense for an Ant-Man team up - you would think it would be a group of Ant Man, Wasp, BP, Captain Marvel, Spidey, and Doctor Strange.

Or maybe they would use it as a way to introduce some of the X-Men using the Quantum Realm as an excuse for why we haven't seen them.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
The thing is, they based Cap 3 off Civil War and Thor 3 off Planet Hulk. Is there a comic book story arc that would make sense for an Ant-Man team up - you would think it would be a group of Ant Man, Wasp, BP, Captain Marvel, Spidey, and Doctor Strange.

Or maybe they would use it as a way to introduce some of the X-Men using the Quantum Realm as an excuse for why we haven't seen them.
True, but the MCU is a master at taking storys and adapting it to a certain character. Civil war was Peter parker as the main guy but they adapted it for the overall story they were telling, and the characters they had.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom