SamusAranX
Well-Known Member
Does EVERY thread have to devolve into politics now?
At least he's remaking movies that sucked to begin with, rather than remaking movies that were amazing and turning them into movies that suck.He's remaking the Harry Potter movies! Just straight remakes!
Better than Star Bores. Might get an orginal thought with thatDoes EVERY thread have to devolve into politics now?
I do reject Frozen, first of all. Frozen is horrendous and if I had cosmic power over The Walt Disney Company the first person to go would be Jennifer Lee. Know what happens in Frozen? Literally nothing.I thought the writing on She-Hulk was lacking, but the show was a perfect representation of the character. If you have an issue with the character, its one that goes back more then 40 years.
How is Turning Red (or Soul, or Encanto) fundamentally different then Frozen or even PatF?What distinguishes the former group of films other then the fact that they came out AFTER a screeching culture-war industry sprang up to pick out targets for hate campaigns? If PatF or Frozen came out today, I feel very confident you'd reject them.
How are they reducing that deficit ?
Kareem Daniel was well positioned for this, until Iger fired him.It means I hope the next CEO is black.
I think they can bring a voice to the company that is not fully heard.
Is that a problem?
How is remaking Potter any worse than what Iger has done remaking every single animated feature for the last ten years? You really need to stop getting all your thoughts from social media entertainment accounts.Oh, an added note on Zaslav - his first love is reality TV (no pesky creatives) and his favorite franchise, the one he's most eager to continue to build into a powerhouse "universe," is the execrable 90 Day Fiance. Iger is Disney in comparison.
PS: He's remaking the Harry Potter movies! Just straight remakes! His awfulness is bottomless.
Kareem Daniel is like if a Stanford MBA textbook somehow became sentient and learned how to approximate the appearance of a human being.Kareem Daniel was well positioned for this, until Iger fired him.
Well chapek was the most unqualified corporate ceo maybe in history not appointed by his parents…Kareem Daniel was well positioned for this, until Iger fired him.
How are they reducing that deficit ?
So two big pillars there are raising costs and reducing content.
- Raising cost of subscriptions.
- New ad-supported tier (which makes more money per sub than the premium ad-free tier).
- Stop spending on a deluge of new content indiscriminately and focus on content that will bring in and hold onto sub.
- This means a lot of leaning on already popular IP
- This also means layoffs of workers related to the streamers.
- Removing content that isn't bringing in or holding on to subs, or, has legacy licensing costs.
- Some of which will be licensed to other distributors, or put on their TV channels
- Eventually combining Hulu with D+ completely to make both more attractive.
- Relying on tentpole films in the theaters to cover their costs, then goes to D+ as a value for that service
- [I'm guessing here that Disney's analytics found that people get D+ mostly for the big movies and not for all the middling direct-to-streaming series... with a few exceptions such as with Marvel and Star Wars]
- Pulling out of the India market whose average sub rate is 60 cents per month and don't seem interested in D+ if it isn't carrying the expensive Cricket League
Netflix just did it. And the other streamers are following suit.So two big pillars there are raising costs and reducing content.
Are they expecting to be able to do both of these at once without shedding subs?
Netflix has a greater diversity of content. When I think D+ I think the animated movies, Star Wars, Marvel.Netflix just did it. And the other streamers are following suit.
If all 'core' D+ users were paying Netflix fees, it would be profitable. And that's what Disney is aiming for. Those who don't want to pay that high of a premium will drop down to ad-supported at a cheaper price, but, because of ads, brings in more income than the premium subs.
Disney needs a leader tomorrow, Iger has died.Yes, I'm famous as a pixie-dusted Disney "fanboy." Awesome catch.
Making the argument you suggest would be grossly over-simplified and misleading, ignoring or downplaying a huge network of interconnected political, economic, and technological changes. It ALWAYS feels good to try and embody confusing and often negative social changes in the person of one individual we can all hate, but its never productive. Iger is a bad CEO. Zaslav is much worse. Both are manifestations of larger forces.
I honestly did NOT see "you're a fanboy for not wanting someone like Zaslav as the CEO of Disney" coming.
You don’t like Oprah?Are you drunk or something?
I love Oprah. She is not qualified to run a company like TWDC.You don’t like Oprah?
Wow almost down 5% now.
Way to go Bob maybe you will finally get canned and the company can find a real leader, instead of a gutless coward.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.