Disney’s Q1 FY23 Earnings Results Webcast - Wednesday, Feb 8, 2023

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Curious to hear what specifically you didn't like, besides the obvious IP infusion and such.
Here’s what no one should like:

1. Revenues up in parks ONLY because of line fees - something that is becoming universally detested by diehards and regular casuals. So what would it be if they didn’t have paid fastpsss? That’s not “growth” at all and it’s not sustainable
2. More bad sequels that dilute what they peddle.
3. Layoffs across the board. You might get a temp Wall Street bump but it’s not a sign of company strength/growth.
4. Any reduction in capex based on Disneys ledger can only be viewed as a red flag. Amusement assets stagnate/decay. That’s the deal with them if you don’t think one step ahead.
5. The D+ subscriber numbers are worrisome. So how you gonna make trillions? Charge more every month for it. That should work.🫣
 

GhostHost1000

Premium Member
9D5480F8-48F0-421A-BF77-B355BBBF9B17.jpeg

Ran across this today…had to share haha
 

CastAStone

5th gate? Just build a new resort Bob.
what numbers do you like?
+8% revenue
+5% OI
Everything from Parks

Also the non-numbers:
Plans to license studio content to external streamers
The plan to make D+ work financially

Iger has a tough line to walk (as did each CEO since Miller) where he needs to keep the magic up on parks and studios and invest in high quality entertainment, but also stave off private equity lunatics who want to strip the company of everything that makes it different and make it into CBS/Viacom. One call is nothing in the grand scheme of things - and we both know that Iger probably has next to nothing to do with this quarter’s actual results - but those numbers are trending in the right direction.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
+8% revenue
+5% OI
Everything from Parks

Also the non-numbers:
Plans to license studio content to external streamers
The plan to make D+ work financially

Iger has a tough line to walk (as did each CEO since Miller) where he needs to keep the magic up on parks and studios and invest in high quality entertainment, but also stave off private equity lunatics who want to strip the company of everything that makes it different and make it into CBS/Viacom. One call is nothing in the grand scheme of things - and we both know that Iger probably has next to nothing to do with this quarter’s actual results - but those numbers are trending in the right direction.
The problem with the parks is the only growth is in prices. They can try to keep squeezing more out of that vein, but eventually the line is going to clot.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
The problem with the parks is the only growth is in prices. They can try to keep squeezing more out of that vein, but eventually the line is going to clot.
Yep. I believe they admit attendance has flatlined. Of course they say it’s due to Covid but boast about how strong attendance is. Almost all the increased revenue is from new streams (Genie+, ILL), increased ticket prices (variable tickets, less APs), or cuts (more efficient staffing due to reservations, less eating/entertainment options, mothballed WDI, DME).
 

GimpYancIent

Well-Known Member
Yep. I believe they admit attendance has flatlined. Of course they say it’s due to Covid but boast about how strong attendance is. Almost all the increased revenue is from new streams (Genie+, ILL), increased ticket prices (variable tickets, less APs), or cuts (more efficient staffing due to reservations, less eating/entertainment options, mothballed WDI, DME).
Yes. Every move drives monetary resources (I mean guests / customers) away.
 

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
The problem with the parks is the only growth is in prices. They can try to keep squeezing more out of that vein, but eventually the line is going to clot.
That... is not correct.

"Operating income growth at our domestic parks and experiences was due to higher volumes and increased guest spending, partially offset by cost inflation, higher operations support costs and increased costs for new guest offerings. Higher volumes were attributable to increases in passenger cruise days, attendance and occupied room nights. Guest spending growth was due to an increase in average per capita ticket revenue driven by Genie+ and Lightning Lane, which were introduced in the prior-year quarter."

Variance explanations are listed in decreasing order of magnitude, meaning the fact that "volumes" are listed before "increased guest spending" means that values increased by a greater percentage than prices.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
The problem with the parks is the only growth is in prices. They can try to keep squeezing more out of that vein, but eventually the line is going to clot.

Yep. I believe they admit attendance has flatlined. Of course they say it’s due to Covid but boast about how strong attendance is. Almost all the increased revenue is from new streams (Genie+, ILL), increased ticket prices (variable tickets, less APs), or cuts (more efficient staffing due to reservations, less eating/entertainment options, mothballed WDI, DME).
They didn’t even try to maneuver/hide it…

What little increase they saw - and it isn’t much - is due to grumpy faced people buying/booking time slots on their phone.

That is NOT growth…or brand strength either…or new potential revenue streams. It doesn’t strengthen the bonds or ties for the consumers.

Did they talk about raw attendance? If so…I missed it
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
+8% revenue
+5% OI
Everything from Parks

Also the non-numbers:
Plans to license studio content to external streamers
The plan to make D+ work financially

Iger has a tough line to walk (as did each CEO since Miller) where he needs to keep the magic up on parks and studios and invest in high quality entertainment, but also stave off private equity lunatics who want to strip the company of everything that makes it different and make it into CBS/Viacom. One call is nothing in the grand scheme of things - and we both know that Iger probably has next to nothing to do with this quarter’s actual results - but those numbers are trending in the right direction.
Where did the revenue come from?

If it was from Attendance increases or merch sales…it ain’t good.


That it? That’s why Bob should get another 5 year contract a couple more shills on the board?

Excessive consumption of koolaid can cause serious health risks🥤
 

GimpYancIent

Well-Known Member
That... is not correct.

"Operating income growth at our domestic parks and experiences was due to higher volumes and increased guest spending, partially offset by cost inflation, higher operations support costs and increased costs for new guest offerings. Higher volumes were attributable to increases in passenger cruise days, attendance and occupied room nights. Guest spending growth was due to an increase in average per capita ticket revenue driven by Genie+ and Lightning Lane, which were introduced in the prior-year quarter."

Variance explanations are listed in decreasing order of magnitude, meaning the fact that "volumes" are listed before "increased guest spending" means that values increased by a greater percentage than prices.
Volume nothing. Increased guest spending yes, hell, keep increasing prices and fees of course there will be more guest spending. Does not mean more guests, just more spending (not because the guests want to spend more either).
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom