Disney’s Q1 FY23 Earnings Results Webcast - Wednesday, Feb 8, 2023

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
This isn’t Disney War. Totally different circumstances. Iger will not be forced to resign even if Peltz wins his seats.
Eisner lost 40% and resigned…
The percentage doesn’t actually matter…it is taken like a vote of no confidence and investors run

Iger is done one way or another. That is set…it’s just timing and semantics now

I’m gonna Tell you two things that will be evident over time:
1. Iger stayed around too long
2. He was never that good in the first place…he did ok with really favorable conditions overall.

Watch it play
 

SteamboatJoe

Well-Known Member
Studios is poorly executed…and fantastic is a dinosaur…

Don’t see how that’s a “strong” park at all?
I wouldn't say it is strong either but Railway is a relatively new ride featuring the company's flagship character. Star Wars is Star Wars. Toy Story is the marquee Pixar franchise. I agree that execution has been lackluster in areas but the brands alone are probably a big draw to the casual. Fantasmic! was just updated. Yes, some people on this board may think its old news, even with the update, but it still has fans and is still new to any first time visitor. Epcot has 3 rides covering an area that is probably close to the entire on-stage size of DHS.
 

CastAStone

5th gate? Just build a new resort Bob.
Premium Member
Eisner lost 40% and resigned…
The percentage doesn’t actually matter…it is taken like a vote of no confidence and investors run

Iger is done one way or another. That is set…it’s just timing and semantics now

I’m gonna Tell you two things that will be evident over time:
1. Iger stayed around too long
2. He was never that good in the first place…he did ok with really favorable conditions overall.

Watch it play
But this situation isn’t anything like Eisner. Like, at all. It just involves the same company.

CEOs who lose a single board seat rarely resign. They just keep going.
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
I just don't see why Iger would be at risk when he's only been back on the job for two months. There's no way he could possibly turn things around in two months. Maybe a year or two, but two months is absurd.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
But this situation isn’t anything like Eisner. Like, at all. It just involves the same company.

CEOs who lose a single board seat rarely resign. They just keep going.
Eisner lost ZERO board seats…Roy and gold resigned and he gained two 😂

You’re getting too caught up on the Disney war thing…the history is anecdotal here

Iger is done because he ran pand left chapek and the things Iger promised prior to leaving are not enriching investors. That’s the nitty gritty here.

My analysis is in real time.

I Might be totally wrong…but I’m not gonna fold my hand in this poker game
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
but sirwalter knows everything
Ohhhh…bless your heart.

I’m wrong all the time…but unfortunately not enough for even my own desires when it comes to Disney predications. You can’t hate me more than I hate myself.

I always hope I’m wrong. It’s just not happening enough right now.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Hmmmmmmm......"Disney Chief Financial Officer Christine McCarthy announced that capital expenditures, which include the costs for building and maintaining physical properties, will be reduced by $700 million across Disney Parks within the United States."
Can you translate what that means?

Are we getting that merry poppins spinner or no?

How about zootopialand?
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
I just don't see why Iger would be at risk when he's only been back on the job for two months. There's no way he could possibly turn things around in two months. Maybe a year or two, but two months is absurd.
More importantly they beat estimates today and the stock responded positively so why would anyone think Iger would be at risk. Ostensibly he has the company heading in a favorable direction
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
Hmmmmmmm......"Disney Chief Financial Officer Christine McCarthy announced that capital expenditures, which include the costs for building and maintaining physical properties, will be reduced by $700 million across Disney Parks within the United States."
There’s a separate thread on the topic but yes Park CapEx is being reduced to $6B instead of $6.7B. Still a lot of money though.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
More importantly they beat estimates today and the stock responded positively so why would anyone think Iger would be at risk. Ostensibly he has the company heading in a favorable direction
$0.15???

Where did the growth come from? What are you seeing in that I’m missing?

And as far as Iger goes…he already has an end date…
Peltz is likely to ensure it holds. No cute extension this time.

Respectfully, I think a few here are missing what’s already happened.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
Hmmmmmmm......"Disney Chief Financial Officer Christine McCarthy announced that capital expenditures, which include the costs for building and maintaining physical properties, will be reduced by $700 million across Disney Parks within the United States."
“We also continue to invest in our parks and experiences globally and in other capital ticks across the enterprise and expect that fiscal 2023 capital expenditures will total approximately $6 billion. This is lower than our prior guide of $6.7 billion primarily due to decreases in CapEx on our domestic parks, reflecting, in part, some timing shifts.”

Obviously, there won’t be major projects breaking ground this year at domestic parks. Doesn’t mean the shovels won’t be in the ground next year though as it definitely sounds like there are some big domestic parks projects in the near future.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
I really don’t think Peltz has a chance. And I think he knows that. Disney’s response was very strong. Doesn’t mean they didn’t make mistakes. I think the Chapek contract was bonkers levels of idiotic. But Peltz mainly focused on the Fox acquisition because he claimed it ruined Disney’s balance sheet and “took away the dividend.” But that simply wasn’t true. Disney’s balance sheet was perfectly fine (and still isn’t bad by any stretch of the imagination) after the Fox acquisition. It was COVID that significantly increased their debt, not Fox.

The Peltz camp never responded to Disney’s response. Not a word. They know they’re not going anywhere.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom