DarkMetroid567
Well-Known Member
I always wanted a brothaa
If I put on my imaginary Studio Exec hat for a moment, taking away any personal attachment I have to Disney or the franchise....
A sequel/prequel that pulls in less than half the original is not a good look. TLK pulled in $1.6B in 2019, 6 years later Mufasa will have pulled in likely ~$560ish (maybe). That is what, ~33% of the original... Not a good return on investment, its WAY underperformed. This is what Execs look at, is it going to be worth it long term to greenlight another one based on the performance of the previous ones. The bigger the percentage from one installment to the next keeps the franchise going. For example the reason they kept greenlighting all the Fast movies is because they keep making money at the box office, though its had diminishing returns the later it went on, and why they are stopping after the next one.
But I'm not telling you something you don't already know. Just pointing it out as its not apparent from the numbers they would automatically just say yes to another one unlike other franchises.
From a creative standpoint, sure, it would be interesting to see where they could take the story. Have it go further down the Lion King family tree. See how much better the technology can get on the CGI, etc.
I hated TLK 2019
Theater closures around the US really starting to show up on the dailies for all films Friday. A lot of big markets closed bc of the wildfires and snow storms.
But, also hearing it was the slowest Friday in months. We’ll see how the films hold out this weekend.
There is no flopping. They win either way at this point. So many of you get so hung up on the box office, and so many films have proved that metric irrelevant over the last century.Looks like Disney has their new excuse when the movie flops.
It cost at least 200 to make it and 100 million in marketing. So by those probably fudged estimates it would have to make 600 million to just breakeven.
Not making money is a “fail”…not a “flop”…There is no flopping. They win either way at this point. So many of you get so hung up on the box office, and so many films have proved that metric irrelevant over the last century.
But if we go like 7…750 (not saying it will)
But if this is the best case scenario to date for a Disney live-action remake sequel, then I don't think they'll try for a third Lion King or some other title unless as you say it does big numbers on streaming.
100%. It is very well known that prequels aren't as strong at the box office. Even David A. Cross, who runs the movie consulting firm Franchise Entertainment Research made a statement on Mufasa's opening. “Audiences like the movie, and family animation has shown excellent holding strength this year,” says Gross. “This story is not finished yet. This a prequel story, and prequels start slower.” And what do ya know? It legged out. For goodness sake, you're talking about a prequel about characters that died 30 years ago. The fact that this has the potential to cross 700 is solid. The comparisons, once again, to 2019 are useless. That year was an anomaly for how many films just exploded and became $1B hits, entirely different theatrical climate.I do think there's a big difference between a sequel that would advance the timeline into new territory and a prequel like this, where the story details may not be known, but the general outcome is already in the can because, well, you've seen The Lion King.
$540M. Yeah, looking like it'll leg out and sniff $700M.
100%. It is very well known that prequels aren't as strong at the box office. Even David A. Cross, who runs the movie consulting firm Franchise Entertainment Research made a statement on Mufasa's opening. “Audiences like the movie, and family animation has shown excellent holding strength this year,” says Gross. “This story is not finished yet. This a prequel story, and prequels start slower.” And what do ya know? It legged out. For goodness sake, you're talking about a prequel about characters that died 30 years ago. The fact that this has the potential to cross 700 is solid. The comparisons, once again, to 2019 are useless. That year was an anomaly for how many films just exploded and became $1B hits, entirely different theatrical climate.
No matter how many people want to try and spin it, there is literally no film ever that can cross $700M and be considered a disappointment. There is no flop here. It did what it needed to do. At that point you're just salty that a film succeeded.
Unless you're Avatar. That'd be a disappointment. That's about it.
What happened to Sonic 3? I thought international was going to save it and make it more successful than Mufasa? At this point its barely going to even make the same as the 2nd one while Mufasa is making way more, maybe even $200-300M WW more by the end of its run.Looks like Disney has their new excuse when the movie flops.
It cost at least 200 to make it and 100 million in marketing. So by those probably fudged estimates it would have to make 600 million to just breakeven.
Thank you for the insightful addition to the conversation.Favreau’s movie sucked.
Even tougher for knee-jerk Disney haters...Favreau’s movie sucked.
The next few months are going to be rough for Disney.
I let you know the day I pay attention to whoever the hell Luis Fernandez is?But wait, I was assured by @Sirwalterraleigh that it had flatlined, had no legs, and was done. Seems the real definition of legs has shown up to teach some here the real meaning.
I'll admit I thought this movie wouldn't do well, stuck to that stance even up to this week. But now I'm willing to eat crow say it'll end up being a solid run, may not be exactly what Disney had expected but will still be solid.
Had to get it off my chest. As blatant a cash grab as I’ve ever seen.
Crossing $500 ensures $700?
Ok…let’s see it play
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.