Disney’s Mufasa - the lion king

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Scraping to make your costs back is some new definition of “succeeding”, eh Junior?
A majority of movies out there strive to just make their costs back and only hope to earn a small profit, and most would consider that "succeeding".

We've unfortunately been trained over the last decade or so to expect huge returns at the box office, but that is not the reality for most movies.

I don’t want to bring it up (really I don’t)…but this looks to land almost exactly where a 2023 “failure/non-failure” did…
So then don't, I think you actual revel in such discussions its why you keep bringing it up.

It’s interesting to watch…so by early next week…post holidays…should be pretty definitive?
It has most of January clear without any major release, so should still have a few weeks of good box office.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Have we reached the part where we now throw big budget Disney productions in the same basket as every other studio hack job?

I’ve missed this one too.

The reason we are all here is the history and reputation for Disney NOT to do that…

Now if the want to say that times are changing and they’ll just grind for diminishing returns? Ok…that fine

And then we agree they new management

And captain obvious fan sleep easy tonight

Now give me a “the stream is gonna make TRILLIONS!!” So we can check that off abs all go to bed
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Now if the want to say that times are changing and they’ll just grind for diminishing returns? Ok…that fine

Absolutely not, but 1 modest success and three large ones (with a couple moderate-budget successes) is actually quite a good year. Studios having all their movies break even is pretty rare, even in the Disney glory days. This year they have three notable success stories. We’re not experiencing the 2023 redux.

Mufasa somehow seems to be on track to actually make money, not just break even.


I’ll go ahead and say it; Mermaid is a great comp. It’s looking to overshoot that one by maybe 100M if this keeps up and spent 80% of the budget… so it’s a pretty clear call this time.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Absolutely not, but 1 modest success and three large ones (with a couple moderate-budget successes) is actually quite a good year. Studios having all their movies break even is pretty rare, even in the Disney glory days. This year they have three notable success stories. We’re not experiencing the 2023 redux.

Mufasa somehow seems to be on track to actually make money, not just break even.


I’ll go ahead and say it; Mermaid is a great comp. It’s looking to overshoot that one by maybe 100M if this keeps up and spent 80% of the budget… so it’s a pretty clear call this time.
They had a good year…I’m on record

This was misguided…and the world seems to want less of that.

Keep getting back to center
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Mufasa somehow seems to be on track to actually make money, not just break even.

Rough sledding. It’s possible but I think it fails on the international
I’ll go ahead and say it; Mermaid is a great comp. It’s looking to overshoot that one by maybe 100M if this keeps up and spent 80% of the budget… so it’s a pretty clear call this time.
I didn’t say anything…you can’t prove anything 🤐

But two questions:
1. Does this mean no crossover?
2. How is Jay-Z’s family gonna afford food now?

…the legal bills (too soon? 🤔)
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Saw this one today. I rather liked it, actually. A good step up from the original and similarly I could have done with like 1/3rd of Timon and Pumba, though not Kiara or Rafiki.

I’m not surprised word of mouth is proving better than expected. Nor that its relatively terrible opening aligned with my own lack of eagerness for this film.

It’s at least worth a watch on streaming, but it was pretty in IMAX.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Saw this one today. I rather liked it, actually. A good step up from the original
That's why I have said from the start, the 2019 film was probably going to hurt this one. If they did mufasa instead of the remake, I think it's doing A LOT better. As I've said, telling new stories in these universes would have been a much smarter approach than remakes.
 

Frankenstein79

Well-Known Member
I don't understand why so many movies by Disney lately look so flat and blurry. Like a broken or unset television. Lion King, Wish and Snow White for some reason have a blurry look to them. No other company has that problem.
 

Frankenstein79

Well-Known Member
Disney seems to have forced theaters to put Mufasa on the big Imax screens. So it seems to have an unfair advantage over it's competition. Put with that that it Globally opened up on the 18th in some countries (Sonic mostly debut on the 25th or later in a majority of countries). It really gave it a headstart. Sonic should have debut on a different date.
 

MickeyMouse10

Well-Known Member
Disney seems to have forced theaters to put Mufasa on the big Imax screens. So it seems to have an unfair advantage over it's competition. Put with that that it Globally opened up on the 18th in some countries (Sonic mostly debut on the 25th or later in a majority of countries). It really gave it a headstart. Sonic should have debut on a different date.

Yeah, most people on this thread don't want to mention those things. Because it doesn't support their arguments.
 

Frankenstein79

Well-Known Member

 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
When 3 articles use the same phrase "gobbling up IMAX screens," it's obvious they're just all repeating some original source. So, posting the same article 3 times in a row doesn't give it extra weight.

Anyhoo you said: Disney seems to have forced theaters to put Mufasa on the big Imax screens.

You know that not one article you quoted mentioned anything about *forcing* Mufasa on IMAX, right? Your source(s) do not back up your claim.

And you know that theaters have a vested interested in betting on what they hope would be the biggest tentpole so as to maximize their own profits, right? Theaters have a reason to willingly put a Disney film in their highest-earning theaters.

You're the one making up things to support your agenda.

Good day.
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
Disney seems to have forced theaters to put Mufasa on the big Imax screens. So it seems to have an unfair advantage over it's competition.
Forced???…. Lion King was a billion dollar film…. Sonic movies have yet to even come close to a billion…It’s not tough to imagine theaters would give Mufasa the priority… The Ultrascreen( our local chain’s version of the IMAX) split it’s showtimes between Mufasa and Sonic….this week they took away Sonic’s times in favor of more Mufasa screenings…. That tells me Mufasa is selling more there…. As theaters are in the business of turning profit

Mufasa has an 88% on rotten Tomatoes audience score….so plenty of people disagree with your opinion on Mufasa
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
Source???

lol…all to defend the ceo with no clothes

It’s amazing how long this has gone on as the business slides
If this was towards me… I am not defending anything… just stating clear facts from what I have seen… sorry if I don’t take what some of the haters say all in the name of narrative… especially when their reasoning is because there is no way anyone likes this movie…. Because their opinion must be fact

But what do I know… I must be a shill…. My check just did not clear for Wish, Haunted Mansion, Quantumania, Lightyear…. Which is why I did not care for those

And I am no Sonic hater… as someone who goes to the theater weekly….I want all films succeed….I am just dispelling some of the conspiracy thereories going on here
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom