A 20% price increase with a loss of 10% of the subscribers is a 10% revenue increase.So they hope the price increase will benefit them in Q2- so they assume consumers will just tolerate them?
That's seems fairly substantial without any obvious big project to pin it on.CapEx will grow from $5B to $6.7B. (If I remember those numbers as they flew by.)
The price hikes are a big deal. In addition, the end of the 3 year initial rollout deal that many of us took advantage of is a hidden price increase. Even with a substantial loss of subscribers when the price increase comes in, revenue should increase significantly.
…because everyone is being overcharged for everything.Net profit went form $2B to $3B, but because it wasn't as big as Wall Street predicted... SELL!!!
So gamble you won’t be dumped for overpricing? Sound strategyFrom Barkely's: About guidance on streamers... churn? sub growth? Can you make it more profitable? (as if Disney hates profits /smh)
Bob: Yeah, we're working on making it profitable. History is when we raise cost, we aren't hit by significant sub losses.
So Espn is dying…nothing breaking there.From Stephen, Wells Fargo: ESPN stuff moving from linear to streamer as cord cutting is happening? Why is CapEx is so much more?
Bob: ESPN is a premier brand. But... linear is declining. So, we're moving to digital. There's synergy with it being part of Disney/Bundle. We're using linear and streaming both to full capacity.
Christine: Some of this upcoming year's CapEx is slippage from the previous years' unspent. Some is consumer facing, some is structural.
A hostile takeover of a company trading at 57 times earnings? That would be something.Not if someone attempts a hostile takeover of the company with the price they're trading at.
Yep, it is gross how much every last shred of any public company need to be optimized to squeeze the customer dry. Gone are the days of making "enough" money and having a well run, reasonably profitable company. Now it's all growth, growth and more growth or "The Street" wets their pants and goes running to the next big thing.…because everyone is being overcharged for everything.
We have to read between the lines. Wall Street is demanding price gouging…those that don’t do it enough are penalized.
Uh oh.
All day - however - isn’t being given some mystical term…as if it’s a “force of nature”
I laugh at how Robert Reich spends all day on Twitter pointing out that global price gouging is the main problem of the dayYep, it is gross how much every last shred of any public company need to be optimized to squeeze the customer dry. Gone are the days of making "enough" money and having a well run, reasonably profitable company. Now it's all growth, growth and more growth or "The Street" wets their pants and goes running to the next big thing.
If it's 3 million at that deep discount, the price increase for that group is from about $3.92/month to $6.67 (if they lock in November 13 for a year before the price hike). That's an increase of $2.75 per month (or about 70%), or $8.250,000 in total per month, or $100,000,000 per year. Not bad. Clearly not enough to make up the deficit on its own.The number of people who did 3 year deals for D+ is a very small percentage. I think it was on D23 members who were eligible right? Think about how much Disney+ subs increased in the first year compared to what it was at launch - everyone with the 3 year deal would have been at launch. I think it was only ~10 million subs at launch.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.