Rock n Rollercoaster is much more intense but E:E has the potential for being way more interesting if it weren't broken and half a$$3d.That's the standard answer to Bama fans...
LOL j/k
Never been on Everest...too chicken to do it...is it worst than the Rock n' Rollercoaster?
I agree, he is very impressive and exceeds the standards of other parks, but he's just not 'Disney' impressive. Disney has set high standards for themselves in the past and in my opinion Disco Yeti doesn't quite live up to those. Nonetheless he's one amazing animatronic.Actually the Yeti looked impressive last weekend when I was there. I know I will get blasted for this, but it is what I thought.
I agree, he is very impressive and exceeds the standards of other parks, but he's just not 'Disney' impressive. Disney has set high standards for themselves in the past and in my opinion Disco Yeti doesn't quite live up to those. Nonetheless he's one amazinganimatronicstatue
he's still an animatronic, just a broken one.FTFY! Animatronics actually move, Statues do not!
Future press release from TDO:he's still an animatronic, just a broken one.
this is exactly why the yeti will never be fixed. 99 percent of the people who go to the park dont even notice him not moving.Actually the Yeti looked impressive last weekend when I was there. I know I will get blasted for this, but it is what I thought.
this is exactly why the yeti will never be fixed. 99 percent of the people who go to the park dont even notice him not moving.
This is true but it points back to unrealized satisfaction. Expedition Everest is a perfectly acceptable ride with a non-functioning Yeti, much like DCA's version of Tower of Terror is also a solid attraction despite never leaving the elevator shaft. To me the difference between Everest with a working Yeti and without is the same as the difference between DCA's and DHS's Tower of Terror attractions.this is exactly why the yeti will never be fixed. 99 percent of the people who go to the park dont even notice him not moving.
This is true but it points back to unrealized satisfaction. Expedition Everest is a perfectly acceptable ride with a non-functioning Yeti, much like DCA's version of Tower of Terror is also a solid attraction despite never leaving the elevator shaft. To me the difference between Everest with a working Yeti and without is the same as the difference between DCA's and DHS's Tower of Terror attractions.
The point was more that if you only know DCA's version of Tower of Terror you're satisfied coming off that ride and you can say you had an enjoyable experience. It isn't until you've had the better experience that you know what you were missing. If the same person only knew DHS' version of Tower of Terror they would be more satisfied but again, not know why.Interesting way of looking at it. The difference being that EE was never supposed to have a Yeti statue instead of a working AA. ToT in DCA added an effect and lost the forward movement that makes WDW ToT so impressive. This was there intention. ToT in DCA is operating as intended, while EE is not operating a intended.
The pathetic part comes because they don't care about fixing EE even though it is not operating as planned.
This is largely true of the WDW experience as a whole. If you never visited before 2000, it's hard to explain exactly what is different as there have been so many small (and some not so small) changes. The place is still pretty darn amazing even if it used to be even more amazing!The point was more that if you only know DCA's version of Tower of Terror you're satisfied coming off that ride and you can say you had an enjoyable experience. It isn't until you've had the better experience that you know what you were missing. If the same person only knew DHS' version of Tower of Terror they would be more satisfied but again, not know why.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.