Dining Plan Hate it or Love it?

brucie

Active Member
I love the dining plan!! You do have to have your trip revolve around your meals but who cares!! I will be using the dining plan for the second time in May.( i will never go without it now) It gives you the freedom to try lots of different wonderful sit down places you may never have tried before. and when we were on the dining plan last Sept we had no problem getting reservations for Chef DE France(i think it's called) same day just a few hours ahead of time. All of the restaurants hold a number of tables for people not on the dining plan that are coming in for the day. It's WONDERFUL!!!!
 

Aurora23

Member
LOVE it! Used it in Dec 05 with friends and it can't be beat. We are all big planners and we all understand that planning is a MUST if you want to get in any where. Just DH and I will be using it in Sept 07 and I can't wait for DH to experience it! He will no longer have to ask me "how much tip on $____"! We have tried many things on the DDP that we would never had tried before. It works well for us.
 

Dwarful

Well-Known Member
We used it on our last trip for the first time (dec. 22- Dec31) and had a great time. Love the fact that with a big group it saves you a ton of money on the tips alone..even if you leave extra $$.
We did have a few issues...but that was mostly with the snacks. Some places would let us have any snack item that was $4 before tax, others said it was after tax.
 

minnie2000

Well-Known Member
We did it last year, with 2 children, and thought it was good. We were sick of the CS food, so it was great to have TS - the food is MUCH better - and it was very good value. We had a character meal nearly every day! There was too much food for us though.

We will not be doing it this year, as my DD will be 10 and we will have to pay the adult price. She is a very picky eater, and seems to live on chicken strips and popcorn while at WDW. It would be a real waste of money to pay for adult meals for her. I wish they would change the age when children become 'adults' or perhaps introduce a 'teen' price. If we pay for a buffet, we will have to pay adult price for her, and she eats so little, its not worth it. Last year we went to the Crystal Palace for breakfast. My 6 yr old tried a full breakfast, and lots of fruit, while the 9 year old ate one Mickey choc chip pancake!

The only way it might be worthwhile, is that my 6 year old loves to try everything. We could order child meals for the 9 yr old and adult meals for the 6 yr old! I will have to study the menus!
 

bradkay

New Member
We loved the plan and used it last year.
We tend to eat breakfast at the resort, snack or lite lunch and a sit down dinner.
We calculated saving a large chunk of cash on meals and used up all of our meal points and most of our snack points.
 

mouselvrmom

Well-Known Member
I really loved it! If I can pay for my food in advance so that I don't have to worry about it on vacation and still get all the character meals my kids want, I'm happy! It really was too much food, but that is why I diet after I get home.:) I mean it's only a week or two of pigging out.
 

dreamscometrue

Well-Known Member
We love the DDP. It does seem to be gaining in popularity too. When I spoke with our travel agent 2 weeks ago, she said that every single WDW trip she has booked the past 6 months has included the DDP. Many of these people tried it last year and asked her to add it to their MYW tickets for their future trips.
 

wdwmomof3

Well-Known Member
You are so right. We also love the plan. My husband is normally tight with money and one place he likes to cut back is on the meals. With the DDP we could get what ever we wanted and everyone was happy. We all ate so much but with all of the walking that we did, none of us gained any weight. When we use to go we would have to pick and choose our meals carefully, now we go everywhere we want to go and have so much more fun. My sister and her family are going to use the DDP on her next trip down and I can't wait to see what she thinks about it. Even my husband thought it was a great deal.
 

Pumbas Nakasak

Heading for the great escape.
The people who like the dinning plan seem to be keen for monetary reasons, and that the reduced cost has meant that they are having table service meals they wouldn't normally.
Those against it seem to be those who would normally dine at sit down restaurants, who now find that long term plans and reassure required, menus are limited and less adventurous and venues are crowded with harassed CMs.

Free dining bugs me because I feel it erodes the benefits of the DVC, is it a wise move by Disney to ______ of some of their most loyal customers, and the busy restaurants can be infested by unruly kids with parents who have no desire to control them, as long as they can get a beer.

Yes I am taking the dinning plan for the second visit on the trot, but its with trepidation, and the hope that things are not as disappointing as last year. If it were free yes Id be less likely to complain, but whyshould I accept poorer standards if Im paying.
 

Dwarful

Well-Known Member
and the busy restaurants can be infested by unruly kids with parents who have no desire to control them, as long as they can get a beer.


Not to mention the unruly parents who have had too many beers. We had our last visit to Chef Mickeys ruined by some out of control moms. These women were downing mixed drinks faster than the bartender could fix them before their meal. They were seated after we were and they were the most obnoxious group we have ever encountered..give us a group of Brazilian tourists over this family! One mom kept coming to our table to try to pose in the photos with the characters..the husbands just sat there, finally the grandfather ( I guess the woman's dad) grabbed her and said he was sorry. We asked to be moved, but we were a party of 13 and it wasn't possible to just up and move us.


I am bringing a big group of kids in August and we have play acted various situations including our dining. Most of our choices are kid friendly / character meals. But by kindergarten every child should be able to behave during a sitdown meal regardless of where they are. My group knows if they can't behave they will sit on a bench outside and miss the meal.

ok sorry for the rant!
 

KevinYee

Well-Known Member
I think the dining plan is a lot like FastPass: there are good reasons to "like" it on a personal level. You know it, you use it, you get good benefit out of it. But there are reasons to "dislike" it on a systematic level: it has downsides for the park, it changes the way you visit rides, it makes the vacation more structured and far less spontaneous, and it annoys people who aren't "in the know."

The same is true of the Dining Plan, on pretty much every point. Plus I'd add another downside: it encourages the company to homogenize the menus. If everyone is just on the dining plan, why innovate? Why have good food at all, in fact?

So I come down on the side of not liking it. Especially if we're talking about on a systematic level, not my personal-use level.
 

meatloafsfan

New Member
I like it.

And I don't buy the "You MUST book 180 days in advance for meals." I have not had any trouble making changes when I was at disney (Dec 05, May 06 and Oct 06). Yes, I had to be flexible with restaurants and times, but I was still able to book a good restaurant within the area I wanted (i.e. resort, MK, Epcot, DTD) at a reasonable time (within 30 minutes of the time I wanted).

I like having everything prepaid and not having to be concerned that the steak my dad wants to order is $27.99 or the soup I want for an appetizer is $6.99 (7 bucks for soup! never in real life). Basically, we get to look at the menus, not the prices.

And as much as I like table service restaurants, there are also some great counter service places which we get to try as well (sorry, if I was paying cash, there is no way I would spend $6.79 on a cheeseburger for each of us - when we went in Feb 05 with no DDP, we always got two meals and one large drink and no dessert to split between the three of us).
 

Dwarful

Well-Known Member
I think the problem is that the more 'popular' the dining plan becomes the more difficult it is to get the places you want. This is especially true if you are looking for a large group/grand gathrering.
 

DBV

New Member
Yeah, I like it.

I think the above post equating it to FastPass is a good anology, but I don't think WDW stops innovating. After all, without innovation and poor food, then I wouldn't do it

For me, a sit down meal does force us to take a much needed break. And I order things i otherwise never would, like dessert.

Sit down is only one aspect of course. It is nice not to have to reach for the wallet every time you get a burger or the kids want an ice cream bar.

I don't like having to plan everything out, but if you have 2 sit down in a day, or do a show, then you can have a "free day" later.

I would imagine that over time this "great deal" will see a climb in price as its popularity grows, making it less of a deal.
 

KeithVH

Well-Known Member
Question for those of you in the "like" category. What happens if you want to do more than one TS per day? Or at least one TS per day and one or more them involves double credits? To achieve your goal you would need to spend more above the initial cost of the DP. Where is the monetary savings at that point?

Maybe a challenge to see if anyone can take a family of 4 or 5, NOT do the DP, still do at least one day of multiple TS meals, go for multiple days and see if you can beat the total cost of DP (versus what was actually spent)? Backed up by receipts of course.

And I'd really like to see the larger groups (4+) who get an appetizer, entree, and dessert each and everyone eats everything. That's a LOT of food for every TS. Shoot - unless much has changed in the last year, most of us could easily make a meal of the average appetizer and dessert. I get the impression from past threads that there is a lot of food being left on the tables with the DP. While I am by no means a Socialist, just on a personal level it seems inefficient. And I have to agree about the quality/menu choice issues - anyone who has gone year over year for the last few years can definitely see a degradation in those areas. More of something does not make up for the lack of quality of said thing.

Put me squarely in the "no like" category.
 

bayoutinkbelle

Active Member
Question for those of you in the "like" category. What happens if you want to do more than one TS per day? Or at least one TS per day and one or more them involves double credits? To achieve your goal you would need to spend more above the initial cost of the DP. Where is the monetary savings at that point?

Just because I'm using the DP doesn't mean I wouldn't be above doling out extra cash to do something like this, if I wanted. If anything, I'd have the extra money to do so because the rest of my meals already are paid for. That's just me though.
 

DBV

New Member
^^
Agree with that. I would be having these sit down meals anyway. Now they are just cheaper.

Aned to be honest, I wouldn't be ordering all these desserts, so the savings there is limited in my mind. For me, the biggest savings comes from the counter service meal, which for a family of 4 is typically $50 (over half the cost of the daily plan).
 

Kerby626

Active Member
So far I like the dining plan. I don't do sit down table service, except maybe Ohana. The wife wants to try some new places. I prefer counter service. That's me though. I will use it though when we do the Spirit of Aloha luau. It's a good thing so far, but it has the possibility to be more, or less. I'm not big on planning, neither is the wife. We dont like to plan our days around meals. My cousin and mom do that, gets annoying. I agree you have to plan somethings though. You can't go in completely blind. We'll see though, maybe it will work out.
 

meatloafsfan

New Member
Question for those of you in the "like" category. What happens if you want to do more than one TS per day? Or at least one TS per day and one or more them involves double credits? To achieve your goal you would need to spend more above the initial cost of the DP. Where is the monetary savings at that point?

If I am staying for 6 nights and want to do 7 table service meals then I will just pay cash for the least expensive one. The cost is no different if I was not on the dining plan - the more table service meals you have during your vacation, the higher your food budget needs to be.

Maybe a challenge to see if anyone can take a family of 4 or 5, NOT do the DP, still do at least one day of multiple TS meals, go for multiple days and see if you can beat the total cost of DP (versus what was actually spent)? Backed up by receipts of course.

For last May, I costed out the trip for my mother and I, budgeting only what I thought we would order in a couple of TS restaurants (i.e. a light lunch, no desserts, sharing, etc). We did the DDP for the 6 days at OKW but not for the 3 nights we were at the BWI - we spent more than I had budgeted during the cash portion of our dining and had worse service. When we switched to the dining plan it was a relief.

And I'd really like to see the larger groups (4+) who get an appetizer, entree, and dessert each and everyone eats everything. That's a LOT of food for every TS. Shoot - unless much has changed in the last year, most of us could easily make a meal of the average appetizer and dessert. I get the impression from past threads that there is a lot of food being left on the tables with the DP. While I am by no means a Socialist, just on a personal level it seems inefficient.

Why does everyone have to get their own appetizer, entree and dessert? If you don't want to waste food, in most cases (combined with a reasonable counter service meal and snack) your break even point on the table service meal is your entree and drink with tax and tip. No one is holding a gun to your head to order everything, nor do you need to do so to break even on the plan. And at some restaurants, for instance, Coral Reef, our group of 4 adults easily enjoyed our appetizers, entrees and desserts, leaving behind only a few bites. It depends on where you eat and what you order.

And I have to agree about the quality/menu choice issues - anyone who has gone year over year for the last few years can definitely see a degradation in those areas. More of something does not make up for the lack of quality of said thing.

While some choice has been lost (i.e. at each individual restaurant there are now only 6-7 choices of entree) I have not found a great down turn in quality. In we have eaten at Le Cellier each trip - Feb 05, Dec 05, May 06 (twice) and Oct 06. I have not seen a decline in quality. I did not book the Coral Reef for our first few trips because the reviews were mostly horrible with reviewers stating that the food was not worth the price (this was pre DDP popularity when CR was still 2 credits). I have seen a great increase in the number of positive reviews of this restaurant - mine included. The crab claws were great, the Ahi Tuna out of this world and of course, the chocolate wave.

And I have to say, I think a great many Disney vacationers are thankful that Disney has aligned their menus so that the "average" person can go into any restaurant and find something they like.
 

Dwarful

Well-Known Member
The one place we noticed a significant decline was the dinner options at Norway. I believe this is because they have made this a "Princess" meal and are now trying to please the "princess" crowd and families. Mind you we are a "Princess" crowd with multiple little girls in our group. However, we always enjoyed Norways dinner and the kids enjoyed decorating the cookies after dinner etc. but that is all gone.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom