I'll help get this topic back on track Brer...
I am currently writing my first ever trip report regarding my trip from 8/30 thru 9/6 so I'll go in more detail there, but I was planning on mentioning this issue. We were not on the dining plan and I have to agree that there has been a slight decrease in service/food quality/portion size/variety. I don't think it is that great a change for the worse, but the poster above who mentioned that Chefs De France said the changes were seasonal might be on to something.
Table service wise, we ate at Flying Fish, California Grill, Ohanas, Restaurant Marrakesh and Concourse Steakhouse. First off, all the meals were good to excellent, but not as good as in years past. I initally thought the changes to the Ohanas menu were no big deal, but other than the change with the shrimp (which makes sense as grilled shrimp is rather dry), all of the side changes are a definite change for the worse and the turkey sausage to be blunt sucked. Yes, I liked the potatoes, but not compared to the past sides, e.g. the fried rice. Also, service just wasn't what it once was; it felt incredibly rushed and our main waiter came back only two to three times (the drink order and the check), leaving it up to the other folks who served the meat and brought the shrimp to attend to us. Honestly, I didn't mind as they were much more friendlier than he was and a bit more relaxed. Oddly enough, he asked us at the end of our meal if we were on the dining plan, which made us think that he thought we were on the dining plan, which was the reason for his poor service.
As for the California Grill and Marrkesh, service is still outstanding if not greatly improved at both. The food was also still excellent, but the choices weren't as varied. Both myself and my best friend, who I was traveling with, recall a much larger menu in years past in both places, this being about our 4th or 5th time dining in each. I can remember at least 5 different flat bread choices at Cali and other combo platters at Marrakesh.
As for the Flying Fish and Concourse, it was my first time dining in both establishments. But I did find the menu choices at both rather limited, although our meals at both places were good, with Flying Fish being much much better. However, the quality of service was markedly different at both, with the Flying Fish having outstanding service comparable to the service at the California Grill. While the Concourse service was just ok.
But the biggest different was at the counterservice restaurants, although i have noticed greater choices especially at MK than in years past, the quality wasn't what it was a few years ago. Best example of this was the Columbia Harbour House. I've been eating there since the 70s. I go each and every trip to MK. Well it was gross. I have always ordered the fried fish and this year the fried fish was sopping in oil and what was once a nice filet is now a fish stick. Actually three fish sticks. It was gross and nasty.
Although Disney probably makes money off the increased reservations due to the free dining plan, it also has to place a great stress on their dining facilities, which inevitably has to lead to cost cutting and time saving at the various restaurants. Thats great that many of you enjoyed your plan and get to eat in these restaurants. But the dining has been a big selling point for my return trips to disney with friends and family. I think next time I plan a trip, i'm going during a time of year when the free dining plan is not in effect.