This was not mentioned in any of the news articles that I've seen. I'm not doubting you, but can you provide a reference, so I can read it?Disney has promised 24 hour access, 7 days a week access to the ENTIRE property other than pier for all. The private secluded enclave that people seem to want is not happening.
Yeah I haven’t seen them make that promise anywhere.This was not mentioned in any of the news articles that I've seen. I'm not doubting you, but can you provide a reference, so I can read it?
They currently have been piping raw sewage to a low lying undeveloped part of the island because Disney’s septic system can’t handle the traffic. But hey, as long as it isn’t in our own backyard, right?
It was mentioned in several places, here’s one: http://www.tribune242.com/news/2018/sep/27/disney-400m-spend-to-better-top-location/. In that article it refers to access in a couple of areas, one of them it says “Besides giving Bahamians full, continued access to the 700-acre site, the duo also said Disney would replicate "the significant amount of business" .................” .This was not mentioned in any of the news articles that I've seen. I'm not doubting you, but can you provide a reference, so I can read it?
My source is a man who worked at Castaway Cay. I happen to “run into him” on Facebook after Disney was asking Bahamians to trust them based on their record at Castaway Cay. This opened up a whole big discussion on FB about Castaway, and I saw some comments by a guy that talked about the employment record of Disney there at the Cay. He seemed to have first hand information, so I messaged him. Yes, stuff that he knows came from the fact that he and a friend worked there for 10 years and 2 years respectively. The 10 year employee just left there in September of this year.Do you have a source on this?
So your source is second hand information through someone you met on facebook. I’ll take it with a pile of salt.My source is a man who worked at Castaway Cay. I happen to “run into him” on Facebook after Disney was asking Bahamians to trust them based on their record at Castaway Cay. This opened up a whole big discussion on FB about Castaway, and I saw some comments by a guy that talked about the employment record of Disney there at the Cay. He seemed to have first hand information, so I messaged him. Yes, stuff that he knows came from the fact that he and a friend worked there for 10 years and 2 years respectively. The 10 year employee just left there in September of this year.
Sorry, I miss your meaning. The man worked there. 10 years. How much more first hand do you need? If it appeared in a paper, most writers will not have been present (first hand) in much of what they write. They use sources as the basis of their information.So your source is second hand information through someone you met on facebook. I’ll take it with a pile of salt.
The complications of what you are claiming they are doing would be huge and nearly immediately apparent.
It’s second hand because you are relaying his information not your own.Sorry, I miss your meaning. The man worked there. 10 years. How much more first hand do you need? If it appeared in a paper, most writers will not have been present (first hand) in much of what they write. They use sources as the basis of their information.
There is a certain irony to our topic on a forum whose main goal it is to seek opinions and experiences from other people. Once relayed from the person who experiences it, it is all second hand information. So by your narrow definition of the validity of information, if the gentlemen who witnessed the actual pipes at Castaway posted the comment, then it’s ok. But by me being the intermediary, then it’s invalid. Ok. A husband who relays his wife’s impression of the DCL cruise lines lavatory on this forum. No good then? I’m baffled, but amused.It’s second hand because you are relaying his information not your own. So is a reporter, and any and all journalists most of the time.
I know it’s common to believe things that you want to believe Or not believe what you don’t want to believe, I suppose
but you have to also question if they make sense. This doesn’t pass the sniff test (pun intended) in any way.
Sure it does. Sewage is not necessarily environmentally impactful. A lot of the world still uses septic or other natural systems to deal with it, rather than treatment plants.It’s second hand because you are relaying his information not your own.
I know it’s common to believe things that you want to believe but you have to also question if they make sense. This doesn’t pass the sniff test (pun intended) in any way.
Reporters should verify the accuracy of the information they receive them from their sources. Sometimes this is done by interviewing multiple sources, sometimes by assessing the validity of the source themselves.There is a certain irony to our topic on a forum whose main goal it is to seek opinions and experiences from other people. Once relayed from the person who experiences it, it is all second hand information. So by your narrow definition of the validity of information, if the gentlemen who witnessed the actual pipes at Castaway posted the comment, then it’s ok. But by me being the intermediary, then it’s invalid. Ok. A husband who relays his wife’s impression of the DCL cruise lines lavatory on this forum. No good then? I’m baffled, but amused.
All correct statements. However castaway cay while large, is not huge. While guests only have direct access to a small portion of the island, via trails and excursions guests are in close proximity to a large amount of the island. If any significant dumping of raw sewage had been going on for years it’s unliely this wouldn’t have been noticed.Sure it does. Sewage is not necessarily environmentally impactful. A lot of the world still uses septic or other natural systems to deal with it, rather than treatment plants.
I'd need to be shown it's doing some sort of harm before making a stink about it.
Sure it does. Sewage is not necessarily environmentally impactful. A lot of the world still uses septic or other natural systems to deal with it, rather than treatment plants.
I'd need to be shown it's doing some sort of harm before making a stink about it.
Reporters should verify the accuracy of the information they receive them from their sources. I did Sometimes this is done by interviewing multiple sources, I did that as well sometimes by assessing the validity of the source themselves. I compared the two stories. One from a man named Shawn Neely, the other from Sterling Thompson.
In this case you (A nameless faceless person with an agenda) is relaying information (That supports your agenda I think an open dialogue is a sign of a healthy democracy, and not necessarily an agenda based event). Your source for this information His name is Shawn Neely, is someone (who clearly shared your agenda Awww, bro, don’t go there. Talking slag about me, that’s fine. I’m first hand. But impugning his character because you make a judgement on his motives? I don’t know, that sounds so, I don’t know. So second hand, perhaps? He said he would still be working for them if he thought he had a future. He liked Disney, and some of the people there. However, when he saw what some of his fellow Bahamians were being told about the sweet deal CastawayCay was, he spoke out. Because he knew about it. Because he was there you met on the Internet ( with no way to back up their claims or even there employment). And for countless reasons the information doesn’t pass the sniff test. Surely you don’t think that makes you a reporter and this solid reporting. I don’t think I said I was a reporter. I have however done some digging. The reason was that some of Disney’s claims didn’t pass the same olfactory exam.
The article certainly does say that. But then how can it be called a "private destination", which is how Disney Cruise Blog reported it? I'm now really confused.“Besides giving Bahamians full, continued access to the 700-acre site, the duo also said Disney would replicate "the significant amount of business" .................” .
.
The article certainly does say that. But then how can it be called a "private destination", which is how Disney Cruise Blog reported it? I'm now really confused.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.