Just finished reading a fascinating interview with Joe Rohde about the creation of DAK - it is probably the most insightful piece I have ever read about the development of the park (perhaps even more so than even the Making of DAK book):
The real insight is that:
1) The Tree of Life wasn't the original design for the icon - it was a much smaller tree from a section of the park called Nature's Headquarters. The Tree didn't move into place until the original icon (a giant carousel was moved);
2) The entrance sequence was originally going to be either a series of empty cages (to reinforce the fact that DAK wasn't a zoo) or giant toyboxes full of stuffed animals;
3) Beastly Kingdomme is a mantra rather than a specific concept (there is great concept art of BK in the piece); and
4) Joe loves DinoRama - his justification for this section is actually very compelling.
Overall a great read and a great companion piece to the previous issue which talked about the development of Epcot Center with Marty Sklar.
Anyone else subscribe and take anything else from the article?
The real insight is that:
1) The Tree of Life wasn't the original design for the icon - it was a much smaller tree from a section of the park called Nature's Headquarters. The Tree didn't move into place until the original icon (a giant carousel was moved);
2) The entrance sequence was originally going to be either a series of empty cages (to reinforce the fact that DAK wasn't a zoo) or giant toyboxes full of stuffed animals;
3) Beastly Kingdomme is a mantra rather than a specific concept (there is great concept art of BK in the piece); and
4) Joe loves DinoRama - his justification for this section is actually very compelling.
Overall a great read and a great companion piece to the previous issue which talked about the development of Epcot Center with Marty Sklar.
Anyone else subscribe and take anything else from the article?