21stamps
Well-Known Member
I know that all kids are different. But I loved those rides at 5/6 (the ones that existed then anyway) and my 5 year old loved them as well.Big Thunder MRR, Space Mountain from the old days as well as the Western Expansion ride (or whatever it was called). Exp Everest, Test Track, Tower of Terror, Rock-N-Roller Coaster, California Screamin', and some others more current. These aren't major thrill rides but neither are they addressed at five year olds. Again, the parks gave all members of the family something to do and were aimed all levels. I don't expect Disney to build major thrill rides (although I wouldn't complain). I am just saying that not every ride needs to have the thrill quotient of "It's A Small World".
I agree completely that it is nice for the younger set to be able to do a lot of the rides but they shouldn't have to be able to do every ride. I also agree that IOA is and should be different than Magic Kingdom. I always go to MK but not always to IOA on vacations. However, my point was more that IOA and UNI have both experienced a great deal of crowd growth and it is because of new rides (some of which are more thrilling). I just hear people saying that they take young kids to WDW and then go to IOA as the kids get older.
Bear in mind that I am not trying to generate an argument but just presenting some ideas. I really don't like the fact that people want to use these forums as a bully pulpit where they can behave like jerks or spoiled children without care for what others say.
He still can't ride everything at IoA, so at this age it makes more sense to spend more time at Disney...especially since I don't have to hear him complain about not being able to do something. The "Slingshot" that is at several parks around the country, including Old Town Orlando, was his absolute favorite at age 5. It makes sense for us to spend more time at IoA in a few years..not only bc of rides, but the theme in general. I think both are great, for different reasons.