MagicHappens1971
Well-Known Member
It's not for the faint of heart....
While this ad was quite a sight, it made me remember the cultural chokehold Frozen had when it came out
It's not for the faint of heart....
Oh, there's worse! Disneyland's 30th anniversary tv special opening with the AA's sing about being excited of having *Ahem* "Relations"....Of course with alterations but the chorus...Is still the same..and oh soooooo wrong.Nightmare fuel...
But I'm sure they patted themselves on the back for that ad.
The creepy singing Grizzly Peak is what makes it.Nightmare fuel...
But I'm sure they patted themselves on the back for that ad.
Disneyland's 30th anniversary tv special opening with the AA's sing about being excited of having *Ahem* "Relations"....Of course with alterations but the chorus...Is still the same..and oh soooooo wrong.
I don't disagree with you... And I used to be as passionate as you about these types of things...Yes, I’d rather it be gutted than turned into a Disney singalong. I’d feel the same way if they decided to have the pirates in POTC start singing Let it Go or the ghosts in the HM singing Friends on the Other Side. Yes, these are Disney parks, but there’s already many, many other shows and attractions showcasing Disney movie songs. This is unnecessary and likely won’t move the needle for long on increasing guest count. If you want to change the script, then change the script, but this is not the way to reimagine what was once a unique attraction. At this point, it’ll be Philharmagic with animatronic bears and a twangy accent.
You guys do know that the songs chosen have to make a little bit of sense... Right?Cmon if they don’t have “We don’t talk about Buford, no, no, no” in the new show, every creative on the project should be fired.
I don't think Disney's current purge is in response to "Moms with Torches".Classic Disney was family stuff, but it had an edge - one of the things that let it appeal across eras and across generations. It wasn’t saccharine. That edge was present in Bears, Pirates, Mansion, Cruise - all the great attractions.
In some cases, that edge caused genuine issues in which outdated material clashed with newer social and cultural standards. There were legitimate reasons to change the auction scene in Pirates, for instance - the problems were that the scene had become genuinely iconic and the chosen replacement was deeply stupid.
More often, however, we’re seeing a cowardly management balking in the face of two factors: we are in a neo-puritan age in which what is considered “family friendly” is absurdly narrow and popular memory incorrectly remembers Disney content as far safer and more infantile then it actually was. It’s a broader manifestation of what Muppets faces - Muppets always had a lot of adult-oriented material (they debuted on SNL, after all), but popular memory has forgotten that, so even relatively mild material is met by armies of outraged Moms.
Country Bears, as is, is a masterpiece. It’s very funny. I’m glad the bears are staying, but they’re about to be rendered toothless, just like much of modern Disney. Family content CAN have an edge, whatever cowering execs and Moms With Torches may say.
(And Song of the South was ALWAYS understood to be deeply problematic, that’s not a result of modern sensibilities - lest my point be misapplied)
Directly lift the songs. We can't allow for nuance or creativity to sneak into this! If they do change the songs, it'll probably be to update problematic (or "problematic", as the case may be) lyrics and nothing more.Do you think they'll just directly lift the songs or rework the lyrics with bear puns?
And I'd say that there's a possibility your expectations may be too high.I would be very, very surprised if they didn’t rework the songs substantially to make them humorous parodies.
I know it’s popular in this forum to default to the most pessimistic reading of everything, but it’s just not an approach that I find fruitful or realistic.And I'd say that there's a possibility your expectations may be too high.
Given that they apparently think they can just put the Hatbox Ghost wherever they want in the Haunted Mansion (and explicitly go against the logic of the attraction in the process), it wouldn't be shocking to me if they went with the most facile, toothless renditions of Disney songs any of us have ever heard.
I'm not opposed to optimism where it seems warranted. But how did they do with the last sorts of makey makeovers?I know it’s popular in this forum to default to the most pessimistic reading of everything, but it’s just not an approach that I find fruitful or realistic.
I'm not opposed to optimism where it seems warranted. But how did they do with the last sorts of makey-makeovers?
POTC auction scene?
Pixar Pier?
San Fransokyo Square?
The beautiful Moana water thing that would have fit considerably better elsewhere?
They have not earned the benefit of the doubt.
They’ve made other changes recently that I quite like. But again, I realise that the general trend here is just to assume the worst.I'm not opposed to optimism where it seems warranted. But how did they do with the last sorts of makey-makeovers?
POTC auction scene?
Pixar Pier?
San Fransokyo Square?
The beautiful Moana water thing that would have fit considerably better elsewhere?
They have not earned the benefit of the doubt.
They’ve made other changes recently that I quite like. But again, I realise that the general trend here is just to assume the worst.
The problem I have with that assumption is that the Imagineers demonstrated with the previous CBJ overlays that they didn't understand the essence of the attraction and what made it work.They’ve made other changes recently that I quite like. But again, I realise that the general trend here is just to assume the worst.
Back to CBJ, I remain confident that the songs will be reinterpreted. The original announcement promises just that, though it’s not clear whether the reinterpretation will be lyrical as well as stylistic. My money’s on both.
I’m a big fan of Runaway Railway (which I’ve ridden over at Disneyland) and consider it superior to the Great Movie Ride. I also think the Jungle Cruise modifications (again, I’ve only experienced them at Disneyland) were well done.Just curious, what rethemes have you liked?
Time will tell. I’m choosing to remain optimistic in the interim.The problem I have with that assumption is that the Imagineers demonstrated with the previous CBJ overlays that they didn't understand the essence of the attraction and what made it work.
If they didn't get it then, it seems unreasonable to assume they will get it now.
true, one can hope though the team working on it gets it, or at least with Vaughn back in Imagineering things seem to be getting a little more on track than where they were. But I think this is more of a local Imagineering team effort, so yeah I can understand the angst.The problem I have with that assumption is that the Imagineers demonstrated with the previous CBJ overlays that they didn't understand the essence of the attraction and what made it work.
If they didn't get it then, it seems unreasonable to assume they will get it now.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.