News Cost Cutting Measures Coming Early 2025

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Got it.

I think we agree more than we don't. Where I disagree is that I do think they like the theme parks. Not being great at running them is a whole other issue.

I think there’s pretty good evidence Iger was at best apathetic towards the parks as part of his portfolio. With a few comments out of him that bordered on disdain. He was far more interested in the media side of the business and the hob-nobbing with Hollywood.

He also surrounded himself with a series of parks execs who had absolute disdain of the product, up through Staggs who simply enjoyed them as a means to an end. Numbers to juggle and manipulate. You don’t plunk those type of people around for the product you love.

Now that said, Iger also likes his legacy and I think the constant presence of the parks in his portfolio has led to general softening of his stance. I’d define the last part of his tenure as even a mutual understanding that parks have value, hold serious legacy and synergize with almost all the other facets of the core business. I think his legacy builds (starting around 2016 with Shanghai) have changed his relationship. He’s also been seen in the parks in the last 24 months almost more than the prior 17 years. We also have the first parks exec that inarguably likes the product. Understand is up for ongoing debate.

I think Iger liked the politicking of Shanghai at first way more than the eventual product - and that somehow morphed into legacy as we got towards the end of the SDL build. Mixed with his clear preference for movie creative endeavors… but Pandora and the mix of James Cameron sort of opened a new door for him.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Usually in threads when “stay on topic” mandates from the plebs arrive…

It translates roughly to “I’m not gonna acknowledge this…it’s less magical…please stop before I cry on my churro 🥹

…roughly
That’s not the reason!

This is the reason!
Agree with Brian. In 10 pages of this thread, there have been, like, two messages about speculation or news of the actual cuts, and the rest is the doom schlock that you guys post in every other thread, lol
Doom schlock!
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
That he was someone who had a history of visiting the parks isn’t new information.
Visiting and "liking them a good bit" are two entirely different things. This is the same person who had a "Master Ship Builder" sign created and installed on Castaway Cay by early 2017 because he signed off on building three new cruise ships. He didn't do that because he liked cruise ships.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I think there’s pretty good evidence Iger was at best apathetic towards the parks as part of his portfolio. With a few comments out of him that bordered on disdain. He was far more interested in the media side of the business and the hob-nobbing with Hollywood.

He also surrounded himself with a series of parks execs who had absolute disdain of the product, up through Staggs who simply enjoyed them as a means to an end. Numbers to juggle and manipulate. You don’t plunk those type of people around for the product you love.

Now that said, Iger also likes his legacy and I think the constant presence of the parks in his portfolio has led to general softening of his stance. I’d define the last part of his tenure as even a mutual understanding that parks have value, hold serious legacy and synergize with almost all the other facets of the core business. I think his legacy builds (starting around 2016 with Shanghai) have changed his relationship. He’s also been seen in the parks in the last 24 months almost more than the prior 17 years. We also have the first parks exec that inarguably likes the product. Understand is up for ongoing debate.

I think Iger liked the politicking of Shanghai at first way more than the eventual product - and that somehow morphed into legacy as we got towards the end of the SDL build. Mixed with his clear preference for movie creative endeavors… but Pandora and the mix of James Cameron sort of opened a new door for him.
I think he recognized his legacy but didn’t really understand it. I don’t think he understood why, despite Shanghai Disneyland and Star Wars, he was still seen as being in Eisner’s shadow. His last hurrah was supposed to be the DS+R wonder table, a project that made no fiscal sense but included a starchitect just like Michael used to, something that reeked of blind imitation to try and get out of that shadow.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Visiting and "liking them a good bit" are two entirely different things. This is the same person who had a "Master Ship Builder" sign created and installed on Castaway Cay by early 2017 because he signed off on building three new cruise ships. He didn't do that because he liked cruise ships.
How many recreation activities that you don’t really like do you do multiple times?
 

JD80

Well-Known Member
I think Iger liked the politicking of Shanghai at first way more than the eventual product - and that somehow morphed into legacy as we got towards the end of the SDL build. Mixed with his clear preference for movie creative endeavors… but Pandora and the mix of James Cameron sort of opened a new door for him.

He was thinking about running for president at this point. That heavily influences him in this period.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Usually it is! This time it was just a pointed criticism no one understood the topic from the jump and started speculating about Indy because they are ‘crying over their churro’ for Dinosaur, as you’d say.

I’m not disillusioned things are going to be cut wildly to make the pre Epic numbers look good. I’m wondering what those are instead of a veiled “save Dinosaur” campaign.

I think you’d probably agree with me here.
I actually do…

But it is symptomatic or the same issue: there’s really nothing for customers going on in the swamp.

And it’s gonna intensify over the next few months - unfortunately
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
If you can show verifiable proof that he "at least liked them a good bit", I'll concede the point. Otherwise, you're trying to revise history to fit your view.
The man took annual trips with his family to Disney growing up and he has talked more than once in multiple interviews about how much he loved those trips and how they impacted his life.

Why is it so hard to understand someone could be one of the worst people to run a thing yet still care about it?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom