I hope that this post isn't construed as political. I'm simply citing the text of the constitution in presenting my opinion. If the mods disagree, feel free to remove but my intention is not to discuss politics, it is to discuss law.People can do multiple things at once.
This new amendment means "Hillsborough County cannot mandate churches close their doors, a rule that drew national attention after the arrest of a Tampa megachurch pastor who held two large Sunday services."
The Hillsborough County State Attorney Andrew Warren said it’s now unclear whether churches and synagogues can hold large services with “500 people packed shoulder to shoulder.”
I have been one to question the constitutionality of a lot of the measures that have been put in place. I don't think it can be disputed that it is unconstitutional to ban worship services. Amendment I is pretty explicit.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "
The other actions can be argued because they are restricting business activities, etc. which the constitution doesn't explicitly spell out. With respect to worship services (or political gatherings), the constitution forbids restriction.
Possibly they could force the services to be held outdoors using occupancy and fire code regulations as some kind of legal precedent.