Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
Pre-internet, would you have objected to pay for the newspaper or should have they given away the papers for free?
We haven't been "pre-internet" in many years, so there's no point discussing such a hypothetical.
This is a national health crisis where the Feds have said disinformation has played a key part in the spread of disease.
If the NYT wants to put a paywall in front of its Op-eds, reviews, or thinly veiled advertisements as articles, that's fine, but they'd do more good will by providing some key info for free and possible advertise their paper more as a result.
Paywalls are necessary -- or the newspapers would be out of business, and then we would not have any good sources of information.
How "good" the info is in certain newspapers is debatable to say the least.