Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
I am fascinated at the use of the words “Breakthrough infections.” The vaccine will not stop you from getting infected. The vaccine enables your body to have an immune response when you are infected, to help your body to fight off the infection.

All the other stuff we should be doing like; washing your hands, self awareness of what you touch and not touching your face, frequent use of hand sanitizer, trying to distance, staying home when you are sick, these are things we need to keep doing!

Actually a great perspective to put it in. The vaccine, any vaccine, doesn’t meant you won’t get the virus. We can all still breathe it in, contract it, test positive for it.

The key is how well does it protect you from serious illness. A vaccine isn’t a magical forcefield. We still need to use common sense.
 

DisneyCane

Well-Known Member
I think at this point most people just need to accept that they will get some sort of variant of the virus at some point in their lives. It's not going anywhere. We've had the flu vaccine for decades, and guess what, people still get the flu. But like it has been pointed out multiple times, if you're vaccinated against it, the likelihood of you dying from it is astronomically low. At that point, it's not something you should be worried about anyway.
The flu is somewhat different because there are so many different strains and the dominant strains are different from year to year. The vaccine that protects against one strain doesn't provide good protection against most other strains. The flu shot vaccinates you against the three strains in each year that they predict will be dominant.

While SARS-CoV-2 could mutate enough to make what you say come to fruition, to date the vaccines protect very well against contracting all known variants. Unless variants appear that make the vaccines far less effective, if you are vaccinated and keep up with whatever boosters are determined to be necessary, it is very likely that you will never be infected by SARS-CoV-2 or develop symptoms of COVID-19.
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
I am fascinated at the use of the words “Breakthrough infections.” The vaccine will not stop you from getting infected. The vaccine enables your body to have an immune response when you are infected, to help your body to fight off the infection.

All the other stuff we should be doing like; washing your hands, self awareness of what you touch and not touching your face, frequent use of hand sanitizer, trying to distance, staying home when you are sick, these are things we need to keep doing!

Here is an article that addresses this. This article suggests that it should only be considered a breakthrough if there is a lower respiratory infection.

 

Disney Experience

Well-Known Member
(Additionally, the source, Haaretz is perhaps the most liberal pro-vax news source in Israel... it's their Huffington Post)

At this juncture, there is limited value to any mitigation, apart from policies that encourage (or mandate) vaccination.

I have not followed Israel vaccine rate for months and therefore do not know how successful they have been in younger cohort . Israel is reimplementing other mitigations as the article below points out.. A lot of papers picked up the 40% story,( see below), most seem to highlight the 40%, but reading deeper we can see the caveats ( reason I highlighted the caveats above the link in the original message).

 
Last edited:

Polkadotdress

Well-Known Member
Here’s an insightful article that sheds some light on breakthrough cases, and how contagious delta actually is. Data was pulled from San Francisco, which has a higher-than-national-average vax rate, yet breakthrough cases are 5 per 100K and unvaxxed is 15 per 100K.

 

Disney Experience

Well-Known Member
This is encouraging for the time being, though I expect the trend to reverse now that restrictions have been lifted:

India’s numbers where delta originated, went way up and then quickly went back down. Though they are worried about a third wave.

Delta domination against other variants that are better escaping vaccine is good for us. There is some hope that the changes to the spike that increase the chance of a virus escaping a vaccine also make it less competitive than delta.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Here is an article that addresses this. This article suggests that it should only be considered a breakthrough if there is a lower respiratory infection.

I see, the current vaccines prevent COVID-19, by definition a lower respiratory tract illness. The upper, nasal infection may occur in vaccinated individuals.

This makes sense, and why a lot of folks I know has this upper, nasal infection that folks are thinking it’s a normal cold.

In any event it’s still good to follow all the germaphobic practices to keep from getting infected 👍
 

DisneyCane

Well-Known Member
Here’s an insightful article that sheds some light on breakthrough cases, and how contagious delta actually is. Data was pulled from San Francisco, which has a higher-than-national-average vax rate, yet breakthrough cases are 5 per 100K and unvaxxed is 15 per 100K.

Can you summarize? There's a paywall for me.
 
Last edited:

Polkadotdress

Well-Known Member
So I was thinking a bit more about the effectiveness of the vaccine and what that means to an individual.

Can you summarize? There's a paywall for me.
Quote from one of the article contributors: “What the last month has demonstrated is that even 3/4 of a population vaccinated in the face of a virus that’s twice as infectious is not enough to prevent significant amounts of spread.”

San Fran has high vax rate, but dispute this they are seeing case rate, and hospitalization rate increase more than expected, to #’s posted earlier. One would not expect vaxx’d to hit 5 in 100K, but they are.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member

havoc315

Well-Known Member
Side note, news sites that put COVID-related articles and updates behind a paywall are awful.

You can't complain about disinformation and the need to reach people, and then Nickle and dime them when they want to get that info.

Unless they have changed, NY Times does a few free articles per month. Pre-internet, would you have objected to pay for the newspaper or should have they given away the papers for free?
Paywalls are necessary -- or the newspapers would be out of business, and then we would not have any good sources of information.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom