How about we stop comparing relative groups and if one is worse than the other call one of them good. Let's evaluate them each on their own. Not good in the absolute is still a problem even when it's not as bad as another group.This article, which is not at all designed to panic people, neglected to point out that, in cases per 100k for the week, the under 12 age group (0% vaccinated) is essentially the same as the 60-64 age group (73% vaccinated). It continue to show that very young people have some kind of natural resistance to SARS-CoV-2 or at least a natural resistance to any kind of somewhat severe illness resulting from it.
We also need to stop calling positive tests "cases." Testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 is not the same as having a case of COVID-19. If 5 billion people were asymptomatically infected with SARS-CoV-2, it wouldn't be a health crisis.
Can we also stop pretending that 2%, 1%, or less than 99% is a small number and effectively nothing? Can we realize that the difference between 99.00000% and 99.99999% is enormous. Especially when it's applied to a very large number.
That article said "Nationwide, fewer than 2% of pediatric COVID-19 cases have led to hospitalizations.". Which sounds "small", but it's not. Based on overall vaccination, we can assume that eventually all 28,000,000 kids age 5 to 11 will be infected eventually. Hopefully, they'll be approved for vaccination before that happens, but let's assume for now they will not. If we assume, "fewer than 2%" is really 0.05% because we're being super generous and assuming it's really bad reporting, that's still 14,000 kids that end up in the hospital. That's 14,000 parents that have a really bad experience. Why wouldn't a parent do something to avoid being one of those?